Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Band 97, Heft 3, S. 79-83
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Band 86, Heft 1, S. 26-29
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: American journal of political science, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 283
ISSN: 1540-5907
In: in Innovative Governance Models for Emerging Technologies (edited by Gary E. Marchant, Kenneth Abbott, and Braden Allenby, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014)
SSRN
In: Women, gender, and technology
"Is there such a thing as a "feminist technology"? If so, what makes a technology feminist? Is it in the design process, in the thing itself, in the way it is marketed, or in the way it is used by women (or by men)? In this collection, feminist scholars trained in diverse fields consider these questions by examining a range of products, tools, and technologies that were specifically designed for and marketed to women. Evaluating the claims that such products are liberating for women, the contributors focus on case studies of menstrual-suppressing birth control pills, home pregnancy tests, tampons, breast pumps, Norplant, anti-fertility vaccines, and microbicides. In examining these various products, this volume explores ways of actively intervening to develop better tools for designing, promoting, and evaluating feminist technologies. Recognizing the different needs and desires of women and acknowledging the multiplicity of feminist approaches, Feminist Technology offers a sustained debate on existing and emergent technologies that share the goal of improving women's lives." -- Back cover
In: Journal of development economics, Band 55, Heft 2, S. 369-398
ISSN: 0304-3878
Latest issue consulted: May 1994. ; Description based on: July 1979; title from caption. ; None published, 1992. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Vols for 19 -19 issued by: the Environmental Protection Agency; 19 - by: the Agency's Office of Technology Transfer; -19 by: the Agency's Environmental Research Information Center; -Sept. 1989 by: the Agency's Center for Environmental Research Information; June 1990-Sept. 1991, by: Office of Research and Development, Office of Technology Transfer & Regulatory Support; Apr. 1993-1996 by: Office of Research and Development, Office of Science, Planning, and Regulatory Evaluation.
BASE
In: KDI Journal of Economic Policy 2023, 45(2):21–50
SSRN
SSRN
In: Sustainability ; Volume 10 ; Issue 12
This paper aims to propose a methodological lens to the assessment of technological innovations in healthcare based on the principles of social, economic, and political sustainability. Starting from the consideration of a lack of a unified interpretative framework of health technology assessment, using a content analysis of the relevant literature on the topic, we identified both the scientific perspectives adopted by the scholars and the most widely discussed topics. Consequently, the less explored scientific areas were framed, and, therefore, those more susceptible to further investigation came to light. The result is an overall picture which highlights the absence of unified and generally accepted approaches to evaluation, together with the lack of awareness on the fact that the multiplicity of methods adopted is essentially connected to the multiplicity of innovations, for each of which a method (or a set of methods) of preferable evaluation can be prefigured. Based on these observations, we propose a general reference framework for evaluation, based on the Viable Systems Approach (vSa), and a schematic outline of the connections between the complexity of innovations and the evaluation methodologies.
BASE
Cover -- Half-Title Page -- Dedication -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Foreword -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. Care and Technology: An Anthropological Question -- 1.1. From mastery to care -- 1.1.1. Making good use of technology, anticipating its potential risks: two possible examples of care in technology? -- 1.1.2. Do we need to learn to master our technological mastery? -- 1.1.3. The limits of the externalist approach to technological regulation -- 1.2. In what sense can technologies be "inherently" caregiving? -- 1.2.1. Can there be an intrinsic morality of technology? -- 1.2.2. Technology and care: a difficult articulation -- 1.3. Taking care of living beings -- 1.3.1. Care and technology: from ethics to anthropology -- 1.3.2. Caring about valuating living beings -- 1.3.3. The difficulty of thinking technology from life -- 1.4. Transition -- Chapter 2: Technology and Life: Analysis of a Divorce -- 2.1. Body, gestures, technology, production -- 2.1.1. Work without skill -- 2.1.2. Control and discipline of technology -- 2.1.3. A rupture in the conception of technology: the divorce of technology and life -- 2.2. The intellectualist conception of technology: the Kantian turning point -- 2.2.1. Difficulty in thinking of the artisan's activity -- 2.2.2. Technology excluded from the field of aesthetics -- 2.2.3. Technology, a synthetic activity without representation and without rule -- 2.3. Transition -- Chapter 3: The Conditions of Care in Technology -- 3.1. Vitalist approaches to technology -- 3.1.1. The concept of technological evolution: contributions and limits with regard to care -- 3.1.2. Technology as an "organ projection": contributions and limits with regard to care -- 3.1.3. The utopia of Erewhon: analysis of an aporia. First condition of care in technology.
In: The journal of developing areas, Band 46, Heft 2, S. 371-396
ISSN: 1548-2278
The transfer of technology from developed to the developing countries plays an important role in meeting the technological needs of the latter. A strict patent regime adopted by a developing country encourages the transfer of the latest technology from the developed world. At the same time however, such a regime impedes the spread of the technology within the developing country through spillovers. This paper examines the welfare effects of technology policy of a developing country, which depends on both the technology transferred as well as the spillover of knowledge from such transfers. Situating the model in a welfare maximizing framework, we show that there are gains as well as losses from a stricter patent regime, which underlines the case for an optimal technology policy that may involve a semi strong patent regime.