Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
In: International studies review, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 515-519
ISSN: 1521-9488
The decreasing importance of "legal spatiality," defined as the relationship between law & territoriality, in the present-day world is studied. Although the Westphalian understanding of territoriality persisted through WWII, as evidenced in the US Supreme Court's decision in Ross v. McIntyre (1891), it is asserted that the Supreme Court's decision in Reid v. Covert (1957) substantially weakened legal spatiality within the US legal system. Rather than assert that globalization is solely responsible for the further enervation of legal spatiality, it is asserted that several additional factors have played a considerable role in threatening the connection between the law & territoriality, eg, states presently possess more incentive to protect markets from the extraterritorial activities of citizens & many advanced industrial Western states are willing to assert their laws extraterritorially since economic competition between liberal democratic nations rarely escalates to military conflict. Despite this trend, domains of US law that still prioritize territoriality are acknowledged, eg, laws dedicated to combating drug traffickers & terrorists. J. W. Parker
In: Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2019-22
SSRN
In: U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 329
SSRN
Working paper
In: George Mason Law Review, Vol. 27, 141 (2019)
SSRN
Working paper
In: Critical review of international social and political philosophy: CRISPP, Band 15, Heft 5, S. 631-648
ISSN: 1743-8772
In: Studies in law, politics, and society, Band 28, S. 117-135
ISSN: 1059-4337
This article begins by exploring the development of extraterritoriality in the US. It notes the expansion of extraterritorial provisions in federal criminal legislation & how these provisions permit prosecutors to proceed with criminal actions for conduct occurring outside this country. It also reflects on the use of an "objective territorial principle" by the judiciary that permits criminal prosecutions whenever the conduct of the actor has a substantial effect in the US. As an alternative to using "objective territoriality," this article advocates using a "defensive territoriality" approach. This article stresses the benefits of using a "defensive territoriality" approach to decide whether to prosecute an extraterritorial crime. 69 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: Key Concepts in International Relations, S. 222-225
In: Geopolitics, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 687-706
ISSN: 1557-3028
In: Ethnicity and Identity Ser.
In: In: Stephen Allen, Daniel Costelloe, Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Paul Gragl, and Edward Guntrip (eds.), 'Oxford Handbook on Jurisdiction in International Law', Oxford University Press, 2018, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: Critical review of international social and political philosophy: CRISPP, Band 15, Heft 5, S. 631-649
ISSN: 1369-8230
In: Manifesting America, S. 75-108
In: Jurisdiction in International Law, S. 42-84
In: International studies review, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 515-519
ISSN: 1468-2486