Suchergebnisse

The article points out that the process of introducing market relations in Ukraine and the growing role and importance of joint-stock companies in the economic development of the country and well-being of its citizens have created the need of corporate governance that emerged due to changing ownership structures and transition to market relations.The study shows that the corporate form of business organization is a new and complex phenomenon in Ukraine. Corporations (joint-stock companies) are the most widespread and significant form of business organization in the current conditions. It is emphasized that the defining feature of a corporation is that it is owned by shareholders who bought stock. This requires a completely different approach to management and control. The nature, role and principles of corporate governance framework are described. It is reasoned that since management and ownership are separated, there is a need to balance interests of shareholders and management.It is stressed that corporate governance is an important factor in the company's activity and development, the primary purpose of which is to provide owners with the opportunity to organize and exercise effective control over management. The essence of corporate governance is to achieve a balance of interests for participants of corporate governance, namely: shareholders, managers, supervisory board and other groups and individuals (suppliers, consumers, creditors, government authorities, etc). The role and place of management in corporate governance, their interests and powers are highlighted.The following responsibilities are associated with executive bodies, or management: solving currents problems related to the corporation's activities, ensuring decision-making by general meeting of shareholders and supervisory board, planning, organizing, motivating, coordinating, and monitoring.It is substantiated that management and corporate governance are different concepts. The key difference is that corporate governance is a wider concept, and management is an integral part of it. The effectiveness of corporate governance rests on the organization of the work of management.

The article examines the possibility of correction of the activity of the political system defined in the framework of the concept of good governance. It is emphasized that for many transformational states of the contemporary world the need for self-restraint of political actors is urgent. The focus is directed on improving the effectiveness of political management through the concept of «good governance». It is noted that in the conditions of democratization the requirements for the transparency of the authorities of its responsibility and adequacy of the decisions made increased. It is argued that in a democratic political process, public experts are beginning to play an increasingly important role. The importance of informatization of the process of civil self-directness is established. The representation of political preferences in political management is analyzed. The role of denationalization and deformation of the processes of political management in the processes of appearance of subjects of political management is explained.Also argued, that the content of the identification of the actors` function of the political management in the countries of political transformations is proved. The incomplete institutional capacity of political players is revealed. The significance of the transformation of modern political management subjects into collective participants in the adoption of strategic decisions is considered.The goal of the article is to identify the actors of political management, which are in the field of influence of the concept and relations «good governance». The task of the article is to identify those functional sectors of political management that are suitable for modernization through the means of «good governance» in transformational democracies.It is proved that an exhaustive interpretation according to which actors of political management must meet the normative requirements framework of good governance as a certain doctrine does not exist. In this case, actors must adhere to certain rules of standards and indicators that are changing in the contemporary world. Therefore, such subjects of political management as party and civic associations may manipulate the governance categories to ensure their reporting on election programs.The opinion presented, that «good governance» in a society of sustainable democracy is a dynamic structure of the assessment of the effectiveness of political management, which is based on current issues in the society main agenda.Revealed, that there is a situation in which institutions of political management should distinguish between the leadership institutions that provide an effective way for modernization and complex reforms. At the present stage, the situation seems to be that the principles of good governance require their communication substantiation and dissemination.A prerequisite for establishing the need for good governance reforms is the relative stability of democratic institutions. In the article established that the criteria for good governance for assessing political institutions are largely based on a certain managerial reality and the achievement of the primary standards of sustainability of democratic governance. They are: the frequency of elections, the legitimacy of the change of government, the availability of rules for political competition, free access of citizens to the decisions of the authorities, developed an independent law-enforcement and media systems. ; В статье исследована возможность коррекции деятельности политической системы, что определяется в рамках концепции надлежащего управления – «good governance». Подчеркивается, что для многих трансформационных государств современного мира насущной потребностью являются самоограничения политических акторов. Сконцентрировано внимание на усовершенствовании эффективности политического управления с помощью концепции «good governance». Отмечается, что в условиях демократизации ужесточились требования к прозрачности власти ее ответственности и адекватности принимаемых решений. Утверждается, что в демократическом политическом процессе все большую роль начинают играть общественные эксперты. Установлено значение информатизации процесса гражданского самовыражения. Проанализировано представительство политических предпочтений в политическом менеджменте. Выяснена роль разгосударствления и деформализации процессов политического управления в процессах появления субъектов политического менеджмента.Доказано содержание функции идентификации субъектов политического менеджмента в странах политических трансформаций. Обоснована неполная институциональная состоятельность политических субъектов. Рассмотрено значение преобразования современных субъектов политического менеджмента в коллективных участников принятия стратегических решений. ; У статті досліджено можливість корекції діяльності політичної системи, що визначається в рамках концепції належного врядування – «good governance». Підкреслюється, що для багатьох трансформаційних держав сучасного світу нагальною є потреба самообмеження політичних акторів. Сконцентровано увагу на удосконаленні ефективності політичного управління за допомогою концепції «good governance». Наголошується, що в умовах демократизації посилилися вимоги до прозорості влади, її відповідальності та адекватності прийнятих рішень. Стверджується, що у демократичному політичному процесі дедалі більшу роль починають відігравати громадські експерти. Встановлено значення інформатизації процесу громадянського самовиразу. Проаналізовано представництво політичних уподобань у політичному менеджменті. З'ясовано роль роздержавлення й деформалізації процесів політичного управління у процесах появи суб'єктів політичного менеджменту.Доведено зміст ідентифікації функції суб'єктів політичного менеджменту у країнах політичних трансформацій. З'ясовано неповну інституційну спроможність політичних гравців. Розглянуто значення перетворення сучасних суб'єктів політичного менеджменту на колективних учасників ухвалення стратегічних рішень.

Purpose. The current socio-economic situation actualizes the need to study and optimize the communication process of public administration. The subject of the research are theoretical and applied aspects of the organization, regulation and control of public communication in terms of good governance. The aim is to determine the content, objectives, principles of communication in public administration as an effective means of forming and reproducing power-administrative relations and institutions of a democratic society. Research limitations/implications. Using the methods of philosophical and general scientific levels in their complementarity it was analyzed the significance of modern information and communication technologies to provide innovation in the activities of public administration authorities. Originality/value. The scientific importance of the work consists in describing the challenges associated with the implementation of the tasks to provide permanent channels of communication between government and society; in verifying the role of the media as both a communication channel and an active participant in the process of public administration reforming; in substantiating the principles of the interaction between public sector and the media. As a conclusion it was affirmed the necessity to develop the state strategic communications program on the basis of an integrated approach, taking into account the importance of communications for optimal public administration providing. The problems of the implementation and practical recommendations regarding the communication between state and society were identified ; Современная социально-экономическая ситуация актуализирует необходимость исследования и оптимизации коммуникационного процесса публичного управления. Предметом исследования являются теоретические и прикладные аспекты организации, регулирования и управления публичными коммуникациями в условиях «хорошего управления» («good governance»). Цель – определить содержание, задачи, принципы коммуникационного взаимодействия в публичном управлении как эффективного средства формирования и воспроизводства властно-управленческих отношений и институтов демократического общества. С помощью методов философского и общенаучного уровней в их взаимодополняемости проанализирована значимость современных информационно-коммуникационных технологий по обеспечению инновационности в деятельности органов публичного управления, охарактеризованы вызовы, связанные с реализацией задачи обеспечения постоянных каналов коммуникации между государством и обществом; уточнена роль средств массовой информации как канала связи, так и активного участника процесса реформирования публичного управления; обоснованы принципы взаимодействия представителей публичного сектора со средствами массовой информации. Как вывод доказывается необходимость развития государственной стратегической программы коммуникаций на основе комплексного подхода, с учетом значимости коммуникаций для оптимальной организации управления общественной жизнью. Определены проблемы имплементации и практические рекомендации относительно коммуникационного взаимодействия между государством и обществом ; Сучасна соціально-економічна ситуація актуалізує необхідність дослідження та оптимізації комунікаційного процесу публічного управління. Предметом дослідження є теоретичні та прикладні аспекти організації, регулювання та управління публічними комунікаціями в умовах «доброго врядування». Мета – визначити зміст, завдання, принципи комунікаційної взаємодії в публічному управлінні як ефективного засобу формування і відтворення владно-управлінських відносин та інститутів демократичного суспільства. За допомогою методів філософського та загальнонаукового рівнів у їхній взаємодоповнюваності проаналізовано значущість сучасних інформаційно-комунікаційних технологій щодо забезпечення інноваційності в діяльності органів публічного управління, охарактеризовано виклики, що пов'язані із реалізацією завдання встановлення постійних каналів комунікації між державою і суспільством; уточнено роль засобів масової інформації як каналу зв'язку, так і активного учасника процесу реформування публічного управління; обґрунтовано принципи взаємодії представників публічного сектора із засобами масової інформації. Як висновок доводиться необхідність розбудови державної стратегічної програми комунікацій на засадах комплексного підходу, з урахуванням значущості комунікацій для оптимальної організації управління суспільним життям. Визначено проблеми імплементації та практичні рекомендації щодо комунікаційної взаємодії влади і суспільства

Main objective of the study is the analysis of the environmental governance in the Eastern Partnership countries. Methodology of the study includes an analysis of the European Union and the countries of the Eastern Partnership documents devoted to the implementation of the environmental governance principles. The study clarifies the concepts of "governance", "environmental governance", "European environmental governance". The main principles and values of the European environmental governance are determined. The environmental vector of the Eastern Partnership and measures that promote the implementation of environmental governance, in particular the Flagship initiative of the Eastern Partnership on Effective Environmental Governance (2009) and the Ministerial Declaration on Environmental Cooperation and Climate Change (2016) have been analyzed. The results of the study show the role of the European Union in improving governance and conducting effective reforms in the Eastern Partnership countries, including the implementation in the environmental policy such European values as democracy, rule of law, engagement, transparency, impact assessment. It has concluded that during 2009–2017, there was a certain progress in the implementation of environmental governance in Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia, but still there are many problems on this way. Ukraine, the first one among the Eastern Partnership countries, has developed a "soft" instrument for implementing the principles of good environmental governance, which has been put in the "Roadmap for the implementation of the provisions of the Luxembourg Declaration" (2017). This document is currently under development. The significance of the study is in the determining the key role of the European values in the implementation of environmental governance and proposal for their wider inclusion not only in this document, but in practices in Ukraine.

У статті розглянуто специфіку корпоративного управління в Україні як результат процесу формування корпоративного сектору вітчизняної економіки. Проведено дослідження щодо наявності певних проблем корпоративного управління та проведена їх систематизація на зовнішні та внутрішні. Серед зовнішніх проблем увагу приділено: особливості процесу формування структури власності товариств в Україні, яка зумовила формування закритого для зовнішніх інвесторів капіталу вітчизняних корпорацій; проблемі взаємодії держави з корпораціями та необхідність перетворення держави в ефективного акціонера; недосконалості законодавчої бази з корпоративного управління та нерозвиненості фондового ринку. В статті також приділено увагу внутрішнім проблемам: відсутності на підприємствах розвиненої корпоративної культури, непорозуміння у відносинах між акціонерами (власниками) та управляючими (менеджерами), нерозуміння ролі корпоративного секретаря та важливості запровадження принципів корпоративного управління вітчизняними акціонерними товариствами. Зроблена в статті систематизація та розподіл проблем корпоративного управління на дві групи дозволила більш детально дослідити їх та обґрунтовано підійти до розробки заходів для подальшого їх вирішення. ; The article considers the specifics of corporate governance in Ukraine as a result of the process of forming the corporate sector of the domestic economy. The research on the presence of certain problems of corporate governance was conducted and their systematization was carried out. All existing corporate governance issues are divided into external and internal ones.Among the external problems, attention is paid to: the peculiarities of the process of formation of the ownership structure of the companies in Ukraine, since the ownership structure that has developed in the country does not contribute to the growth of the performance indicators of corporations, and on the contrary - led to the formation of the capital closed to foreign investors of domestic corporations; the problem of interaction between the state and corporations, which is connected with the necessity of transforming the state, as the shareholder of some joint-stock enterprises, into an effective shareholder; the imperfection of the legislative framework for corporate governance and the underdevelopment of the stock market. It is noted that the Ukrainian model of corporate governance is at the stage of its formation and combines elements of outsider and insider's models.The article also focuses on internal problems: lack of corporate culture in enterprises, misunderstanding in the relations between shareholders (owners) and managers (managers), misunderstanding of the role of corporate secretary and the importance of introducing corporate governance principles for domestic joint-stock companies.Such a systematization and division of corporate governance issues into two groups allowed them to investigate more closely and reasonably approach the development of measures for their further resolution.The article concludes that solving existing problems of corporate governance in the country, taking into account the world experience of management, its adaptation to national economic conditions are the necessary directions for improving corporate governance in Ukraine.

Управління кредитним ризиком банку направлене на запобігання ймовірності настання негативного впливу на діяльність банківської системи в цілому та розробку шляхів та заходів вчасного реагування у випадку настання ризику.Актуальність даної теми обумовлюється нестабільністю банківської системи, широким спектром існування ризикорієнтованих факторів, що стримують фінансово-економічну незалежність банків. З метою передбачення та вчасного виявлення, розробкою реальних заходів щодо запобігання кредитного ризику, грамотним його управлінням та розв'язком, дана стаття направлена на характеристику основних ризик орієнтованих моментів в управлінні різних сфер банківської діяльності.Ціль даної статті направлена на дослідження та втілення ризикорієнтованого управління у банківській діяльності, використання найдоцільніших важелів впливу щодо покращення управлінських рішень у вирішенні проблемних питань з настанням кредитних ризиків у сфері банківського менеджменту. ; Management of the bank's credit risk is directed at preventing the possibility of an adverse impact on the activities of banking system im general and the development of ways and measures for timely response in the event of a risk.The urgency of this issue is conditioned by the instability of banking system, the wide spectrum of existence of risk-oriental factors that restrain the anancial and economic independence of banks. For the purpose of pre-emptive and timely detection, developing effective measures to prevent credit risk, competent management and resolution. This article is devoted to the characterization of the main risk of oriented moments in the management of various spheres of banking activity.The purpose of this article is to focus on the research and implementation of risk-oriented management in banking activities, use of the most suitable levers of influence for improve managerial solutions in solving problems with onset of credit risks in the spheres of banking management.Crisis phenomena of the financial system lead to significant problems in the banking segment of our state, which are related with abrupt reduction in the amount of banks, increase in level of riskiness of banks. That's why there is a necessity for risk-oriented management in the banking management system to form a system of guaranteeing the prevention of similar problems in the future. Thus, the modern banking system is still underdeveloped, does not obey its functions properly and lags behind other European countries. This situation extends the risks for the further stable functioning of the banking system, reduces its ability to allocate constantly increasing money supply and implement effective redistribution of temporarily free funds across the country's economy.Efficient risk management consists of several stages, from the identification of potential, possible causes to constant control of the level of risk. The regularity of risk monitoring, continuity and constant research of its level has been becoming great valuable. Domestic economists haven't defined optimum methods of credit risks management in the bank activity. However, recent international researches of scientists on risk issues denote us the necessity of the formation risk-oriented management in experts and heads of enterprises in our state.It should be noticed that the bank credit risk is traditionally related with certain factors of the services and operations: commercial bank credit operations, investment (formation of portfolio securities), guarantee services, derivative operations, loan services (leasing, factoring, etc.)Consequently, each of these services and operations has a common factor that can be identified as a risk. But we think the another type of risk, such as risk-oriented management, which is needed to achieve the efficiency of the management system, must be added to these factors. Such risk management provides a set of measures and methods of management the numerous hazards and opportunities, that affect its ability to achieve the intended goals and its control, implemented by the financial institution. Although risk is not a loss for the bank, its understanding and management can increase the efficiency of any business. The problem for any bank is losses. The threat of emergence of losses, the concept of their causes compels to manage risk and develops the necessary measures to reduce the risk of financial losses. We can assume that risk is a measure of danger, which is determined by the probability of realization of a hazard in a dangerous event and the degree of gravity of financial losses.There is a necessity of approval risk-oriented management and thinking in the sphere of quality management, finance, banking, ecology, energy conservation, etc., at the legislative level in our state nowadays in terms of implementation of the requirements of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU.

Practices of activity of bodies of judicial self-government of foreign countriesare analyzed. It is determined that the place and role of judicial self-governmentin the structure of the judiciary is determined by the national, historical traditionsof a particular country. It has been found that in most foreign countries, judicialself-government bodies act as independent bodies, both in relation to the legislatureand the executive, as well as to the judiciary.The scientific and theoretical study of typical models of judicial self-governmentfor the countries of Europe is carried out. The basic powers of the bodies of judicialself-government are highlighted.It is established that in most constitutions of European states, judicial selfgovernment bodies are designated as institutions of judicial self-government andare included in bodies that are not vested with judicial functions but are partof this branch of government.It is determined that in Western Europe there are two models of the organizationof the Judicial Councils: Northern (Sweden, Denmark, Norway) and Southern(French-Italian, Spanish-Portuguese). The peculiarity of the first model is thatthere is no single body designed to ensure the independence of the courts andthe independence of judges, the powers shared between the various bodies andinstitutions. The second is characterized by a liberal position in the system ofpublic authorities. The states of Central and Eastern Europe, in the creationof the Judicial Councils, modeled the Southern model of the model.It is substantiated that in order to further introduce positive experiencein the legislation of Ukraine, the experience of France is interesting, and among Актуальні проблеми політики. 2018. Вип. 62the countries of the post-socialist camp of Central and Eastern Europe – Poland,which is most actively carrying out the reform of the judiciary. ; Проведено аналіз практики діяльності органів суддівського самоврядування зарубіжних країн. Здійснено науково-теоретичне дослідження типовихмоделей суддівського самоврядування для країн Європи. Виділено основніповноваження органів суддівського самоврядування. ; Проведено аналіз практики діяльності органів суддівського самоврядування зарубіжних країн. Здійснено науково-теоретичне дослідження типовихмоделей суддівського самоврядування для країн Європи. Виділено основніповноваження органів суддівського самоврядування.

Summary. Introduction. Providing of public equilibrium, establishment of mutual relations of collaboration and solidarity envisages the using of principles, that take into account the specific of mutual relations of individual and association, person and religious organization, and realization of that provides the redistribution of plenary powers between local associations and associations of the higher, centralized level. One of such principles there is a principle of subsidiarity. Purpose. The aim of the article is research of maintenance and practical measuring of principle of subsidiarity in Catholic social teaching. Methods. In order to examine the sense of subsidiarity, to trace consistently its conceptual evolution the author used coherent analytical tools. Results. Important for understanding the essence of principle of subsidiarity is a thesis on intercommunication and mutual responsibility of person and society, man and church organization. The realization of principle of subsidiarity envisages establishing the order, at what association of local level get all necessary functions, and the associations of higher level are allotted auxiliary and coordinating plenary powers. In accordance with principle of subsidiarity, central power must execute exactly auxiliary, but not leading role, deciding those tasks that can not be effectively executed at local level only. Originality. The principle of subsidiarity, from the point of view of Catholic social teaching, is based on a grant to the people a possibility to decide the questions, that they are touched and are urgent, without influence from the side of more centralized, social or private, religious or state institutes. Correct use of the principle of subsidiarity creates the counterbalance of omnipotence of external in relation to a man power, to the tendencies of centralization and depersonalization of human personality in the modern world, strengthens a democratic line-up, carrying out the proper distribution of tasks and delegation of plenary powers, and also distribution of power and control above her. Conclusion. The principle of subsidiarity finds his ground in the Catholic social teaching as democratic social principle of organization of free and humane society. As normative principle of governing, subsidiarity called to assist strengthening of dialogue, search of methods of mutual acceptance of decisions in a church.

The article deals with the crucial importance of information and communication technologies in improving the expert support of the activities of state authorities. Within the theories of a socially oriented state, modern state management is focused on customer service, which requires new approaches in the activities of the central administrative offices in providing a wide range of management services. In the context of this, along with the problem of analytical processing of the mass volume of information, there is a need for geopolitical, social and economic monitoring that supports decision-making processes on complex problems in various spheres of society's activity. It is considered for expedient to use the e-government technological services for improving the information-analytical processing of structured data in the field of state administration. It is determined that the use of electronic services of the multi-channel e-government system expands the boundaries of public interactive participation in the process of making managerial decisions and promotes socio-productive use of the results of information-analytical monitoring. Accordingly, the creation and operation of information and analytical systems of government as integrated corporate systems should be based on the proven solutions and information and telecommunication platforms.

In the article the definitions of «corporation», «corporate governance», «efficiency ofcorporate governance» are defined. It was found that the characteristic features of an effective system ofcorporate governance are honesty, transparency, accountability and responsibility. Corporate governancein Ukraine was analyzed and it was found that the weakness that prevents the formation of an effectivesystem of corporate governance is the level of institutions that directly affect on property rights –corruption, the judiciary, professionalism and honesty of managers. The reasons of a low level ofimplementation of corporate governance standards in Ukraine are analyzed. The basic directions offormation of a new model of economic growth in Ukraine in the coming years are determined, namely theshift of much of the financial resources from primary industries to the development of the «new»economy based on innovation and knowledge, to the formation of competitive intangibles and intellectualcapital. The necessity of increasing the role of human capital of innovation type was proved to contributeto the effectiveness of the social component of corporate governance and will provide employment,stimulate the formation segment of skilled labor; develop a system of training and retraining of workers,increase investment and innovation investments in human capital. It was established that the current stateof the national economy requires a rethinking of existing problems and the formation of more adequate tomodern conditions of managing the national system of corporate governance that takes into considerationa number of factors, the main ones are: the mentality of society; a national culture, political and economicsituation, the level of technology and knowledge-intensive activities in foreign markets and theinternationalization of business. ; В статье даны определения таких понятий как «корпорация», «корпоративноеуправление», «эффективность системы корпоративного управления». Выяснено, чтохарактерными чертами эффективной системы корпоративного управления является честность,прозрачность, подотчетность и ответственность. Проанализировано корпоративное управление вУкраине и выяснено, что наиболее слабым местом, что препятствует формированию эффективнойсистемы корпоративного управления, является уровень развития институтов, которыенепосредственно влияют на защиту прав собственности – коррупция, неэффективная судебнаясистема, недостаточно высокий профессионализм и честность менеджеров. Проанализированыпричины низкого уровня внедрения стандартов корпоративного управления в Украине.Определены основные направления формирования новой модели экономического роста в Украинена следующие годы, а именно переориентация значительной части финансовых ресурсов изсырьевых отраслей на развитие «новой» экономики, базирующейся на инновациях, знаниях, наформирование конкурентоспособных нематериальных активов, интеллектуального капитала.Доказана необходимость повышения роли человеческого капитала инновационного типа, чтобудет способствовать повышению уровня социальной составляющей эффективности системыкорпоративного управления и позволит обеспечить занятость, стимулирование становлениясегмента высококвалифицированной рабочей силы; развивать систему профессиональногообучения и переобучение работников, усилить инвестиционные и инновационные вложения вчеловеческий капитал. Установлено, что текущее состояние национальной экономики диктуетнеобходимость переосмысления существующих проблем и формирования более адекватнойсовременным условиям хозяйствования отечественной системы корпоративного управления,которая предполагает учет многих факторов, основными из которых являются: ментальностьобщества; общенациональная культура, политическая и экономическая ситуация, уровеньтехнологичности и наукоемкости, деятельность на внешних рынках и интернационализациябизнеса. ; У статті подано визначення таких понять як «корпорація», «корпоративнеуправління», «ефективність системи корпоративного управління». З'ясовано, що характернимирисами ефективної системи корпоративного управління є чесність, прозорість, підзвітність тавідповідальність. Проаналізовано корпоративне управління в Україні та визначено, що найбільшслабким місцем, яке перешкоджає формуванню ефективної системи корпоративного управління єрівень розвитку інституцій, які безпосередньо впливають на захист прав власності – корупція,неефективна судова система, недостатньо високий професіоналізм та чесність менеджерів.Проаналізовано причини низького рівня впровадження стандартів корпоративного управління вУкраїні. Визначено основні напрями формування нової моделі економічного зростання в Україніна наступні роки, а саме переорієнтація значної частини фінансових ресурсів із сировиннихгалузей на розвиток «нової» економіки, що базується на інноваціях, знаннях, на формуванняконкурентоздатних нематеріальних активів, інтелектуального капіталу. Доведена необхідністьпідвищення ролі людського капіталу інноваційного типу, що сприятиме підвищенню рівнясоціальної складової ефективності системи корпоративного управління та дозволить забезпечитизайнятість, стимулювання становлення сегмента висококваліфікованої робочої сили; розвиватисистему професійного навчання та перенавчання працівників, посилити інвестиційні таінноваційні вкладення в людський капітал. Встановлено, що поточний стан національноїекономіки диктує необхідність переосмислення існуючих проблем і формування більш адекватноїсучасним умовам господарювання вітчизняної системи корпоративного управління, якапередбачає врахування багатьох факторів, основними з яких є: ментальність суспільства;загальнонаціональна культура, політична та економічна ситуація, рівень технологічності танаукоємності, діяльність на зовнішніх ринках та інтернаціоналізація бізнесу.

Здійснено обґрунтування інституції громадянського суспільства – громадської організації як необхідного елемента демократичного управління. Запропоновано характеристику означень організаційної сутності громадської організації в змісті перспектив розвитку громадянського суспільства в Україні. Акцентовано увагу на соціальному призначенні громадської організації, що походить від природного потягу громадян до колективної самоорганізації та самоврядування. Підтверджено, що організована інституція виконує функції, які є індикатором демократичного розвитку держави та суспільства. ; Problem setting. The question of state-building of Ukraine as a European democratic state has always been connected with the desire of citizens to directly participate in socio-political processes, have an influence on the state, its internal and foreign policy orientations. The main significance of the functioning of civic organizations today is that they essentially contribute to the social and state integration of Ukrainians and the institutionalization of the interests of citizens of the state through democratic procedures.Recent research and publications analysis. Despite the sufficient and diverse study of the status of a civic organization in Ukrainian and foreign science, the problem of its function as a necessary element of democratic governance has a one-sided comprehension. In fact, researchers in the scientific community have a certain consensus on understanding the institutional role of a public organization in democratic processes. In the context of the contemporary development of a democratic regime in Ukraine, the topic under study in a new way announces an essential view of the meaningful features of civic organizations in the works of many scholars. We were interested in problems of practical improvement of the functional capabilities of a public organization as an essential element of public administration and the place of democracy in modern social and state relations.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The Ukrainian state, though not rapidly, but gradually and dynamically, is embedded in the construction of the interaction of the state and society with the nature of democratic relations, the ultimate goal of which is the formation of a stable system of the rule of law of civil society. In this regard, a special place is given to public organizations, which, of course, should act as a unifying mediator in socio-political processes and must assume the mission of a democratic interagency administrative tool. At the same time, from the point of view of influence on political decisions, articulation of public interests and formation of social interests, a number of practical issues, problems and warnings about their social and legal capacity and place in state creation.Paper main body. The starting point for understanding the role of civic organizations as an essential element of democratic governance is to perceive it as a center for the accumulation of citizens' interests. Such institutions must without hesitation provide citizens with confidence in securing their own interests before the state and in civil society. In this context, an idea of the instrumental representation of people's will is formed. In the context of public administration, it is quite often possible to find a meaningful definition of "democracy", which eventually became too formalized. In our case, this term is the basis of the essential understanding of the activities of a public organization. A public organization is a social representation of the "people", "community", "citizens," and provides especially essential content with the concept of "democracy". In such an organization, citizens receive not only the "right to power", but they can also be involved on a full-fledged basis in the system of public administration and the process of state formation, which is guaranteed by the normative and legal principles of a democratic state.It should also be noted that a clear view of the functions of civic organizations, as well as their institutional status, today does not include specialists. In general, this does not complicate their functioning as a democratic element of civil society, since the statutory and programmatic diversity of structural units specifies their infrastructure value.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Characteristics of various denominations of a public organization and its functional guidelines point to the fact that it is not only a structural unit - an institution of civil society as an institution of democracy, but also one of the most dynamic elements of it. Despite the variety of definitions and the use of various variants of explanation of the concept under study, scientists of various disciplinary directions are generally almost unanimous in the thought of its meaningful, so to speak, classical understanding. This is an important consensus moment that deprives practitioners of manipulations and legal conflicts of pessimistic views on the place and role of civic organizations in the state-public construct of modern democratic development. Public organizations in this context should take their institutional place and play a constructive socio-democratic role.

Здійснено обґрунтування інституції громадянського суспільства – громадської організації як необхідного елемента демократичного управління. Запропоновано характеристику означень організаційної сутності громадської організації в змісті перспектив розвитку громадянського суспільства в Україні. Акцентовано увагу на соціальному призначенні громадської організації, що походить від природного потягу громадян до колективної самоорганізації та самоврядування. Підтверджено, що організована інституція виконує функції, які є індикатором демократичного розвитку держави та суспільства. ; Problem setting. The question of state-building of Ukraine as a European democratic state has always been connected with the desire of citizens to directly participate in socio-political processes, have an influence on the state, its internal and foreign policy orientations. The main significance of the functioning of civic organizations today is that they essentially contribute to the social and state integration of Ukrainians and the institutionalization of the interests of citizens of the state through democratic procedures.Recent research and publications analysis. Despite the sufficient and diverse study of the status of a civic organization in Ukrainian and foreign science, the problem of its function as a necessary element of democratic governance has a one-sided comprehension. In fact, researchers in the scientific community have a certain consensus on understanding the institutional role of a public organization in democratic processes. In the context of the contemporary development of a democratic regime in Ukraine, the topic under study in a new way announces an essential view of the meaningful features of civic organizations in the works of many scholars. We were interested in problems of practical improvement of the functional capabilities of a public organization as an essential element of public administration and the place of democracy in modern social and state relations.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The Ukrainian state, though not rapidly, but gradually and dynamically, is embedded in the construction of the interaction of the state and society with the nature of democratic relations, the ultimate goal of which is the formation of a stable system of the rule of law of civil society. In this regard, a special place is given to public organizations, which, of course, should act as a unifying mediator in socio-political processes and must assume the mission of a democratic interagency administrative tool. At the same time, from the point of view of influence on political decisions, articulation of public interests and formation of social interests, a number of practical issues, problems and warnings about their social and legal capacity and place in state creation.Paper main body. The starting point for understanding the role of civic organizations as an essential element of democratic governance is to perceive it as a center for the accumulation of citizens' interests. Such institutions must without hesitation provide citizens with confidence in securing their own interests before the state and in civil society. In this context, an idea of the instrumental representation of people's will is formed. In the context of public administration, it is quite often possible to find a meaningful definition of "democracy", which eventually became too formalized. In our case, this term is the basis of the essential understanding of the activities of a public organization. A public organization is a social representation of the "people", "community", "citizens," and provides especially essential content with the concept of "democracy". In such an organization, citizens receive not only the "right to power", but they can also be involved on a full-fledged basis in the system of public administration and the process of state formation, which is guaranteed by the normative and legal principles of a democratic state.It should also be noted that a clear view of the functions of civic organizations, as well as their institutional status, today does not include specialists. In general, this does not complicate their functioning as a democratic element of civil society, since the statutory and programmatic diversity of structural units specifies their infrastructure value.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Characteristics of various denominations of a public organization and its functional guidelines point to the fact that it is not only a structural unit - an institution of civil society as an institution of democracy, but also one of the most dynamic elements of it. Despite the variety of definitions and the use of various variants of explanation of the concept under study, scientists of various disciplinary directions are generally almost unanimous in the thought of its meaningful, so to speak, classical understanding. This is an important consensus moment that deprives practitioners of manipulations and legal conflicts of pessimistic views on the place and role of civic organizations in the state-public construct of modern democratic development. Public organizations in this context should take their institutional place and play a constructive socio-democratic role.

On the basis of the study of contemporary practices of corporations in global financial markets it is proved that corporate information management system for medium and large enterprises is a necessary tool to ensure minimizing costs and increase profitability of the company. The main aim of the article is to determine the characteristics of information technology in corporate governance in order to improve the domestic business practices and corporations improve their performance in terms of globalization. Research global corporate governance practices and features of corporation information systems allow to select three classes of corporate information systems: local, secondary integrated, large integrated systems. The analysis of national practices of information technology in corporations identified differences functioning of corporate information systems in Ukraine by foreign enterprises, foreign enterprises major problem is the issue of excess data and domestic companies the main problem is their lack; foreign companies solve the problem of collecting and analyzing data, domestic companies involved in the data collection. There is highlighted the problem of information technology in domestic corporations, corporate systems do not meet fully the concept of corporate information management system; reliance on information technology systems that help managers carry out current management of different business spheres; significant cost of purchasing software. It is proved that the determinant in deciding the tasks assigned to Ukraine in the field of information is the current state and trends in the information economy of developed countries, the EU experience to create their own information infrastructure and a broad implementation in all areas of life and business information technology. To solve the existing problems of corporate information systems it is offered algorithm of actions improving information and performance of corporations that will solve the current issues of implementation of corporate information systems, taking into account national legislation and peculiarities of corporate governance, increase the efficiency and transparency of business processes and provide centralized support of managerial making at all levels and in all areas of business companies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2017.3.55365 ; На основі проведеного дослідження сучасної практики діяльності корпорацій на світовому фінансовому ринку доведено, що корпоративні інформаційні системи для керівництва середніх і великих підприємств є необхідним інструментом, що дозволяє забезпечити мінімізацію витрат і збільшити прибутковість підприємства. Метою статті є визначення особливостей впровадження інформаційних технологій в систему корпоративного управління з метою вдосконалення вітчизняної практики ведення бізнесу корпораціями та підвищення ефективності їх діяльності в умовах розвитку глобалізаційних процесів. Дослідження світової практики корпоративного управління та особливостей застосування корпораціями інформаційних систем дозволило виділити три класи корпоративних інформаційних систем: локальні, середні інтегровані, великі інтегровані системи. На основі аналізу вітчизняної практики впровадження інформаційних технологій в корпораціях визначено відмінності функціонування корпоративних інформаційних систем в Україні від зарубіжних підприємств: для іноземних підприємств основною проблемою є питання надлишку даних, а для вітчизняних компаній основною проблемою є їх нестача; іноземні компанії вирішують проблему накопичення та аналізу даних, вітчизняні компанії займаються питанням збору даних. Виділено проблеми розвитку інформаційних технологій в вітчизняних корпораціях: системи корпорацій не відповідають повною мірою поняттю корпоративна інформаційна система управління; переважне використання інформаційно-технологічних систем, за допомогою яких менеджери здійснюють поточне керівництво різними сферами бізнесу; значні витрати на придбання програмного забезпечення. Доведено, що визначальними орієнтирами у вирішенні завдань, що поставлені перед Україною у сфері інформатизації є сучасний стан та тенденції розвитку інформаційного сектора економіки розвинених країн, досвід Європейського Союзу зі створення власної інформаційної інфраструктури і широкого впровадження в усі сфери життя і діяльності інформаційних технологій. Для вирішення існуючих проблем розвитку корпоративних інформаційних систем запропоновано алгоритм дій підвищення рівня інформатизації та ефективності діяльності корпорацій, який дозволить вирішити актуальні питання впровадження корпоративних інформаційних систем, враховуючи вітчизняне законодавство та особливості корпоративного управління, підвищити ефективність і прозорість бізнес-процесів і забезпечити централізовану підтримку прийняття управлінських рішень на всіх рівнях і у всіх сферах бізнесу компаній. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2017.3.55365

Досліджено особливості та сутність інноваційного мислення як чинника розвитку публічного врядування. Обґрунтовано положення про те, що інноваційне мислення є особливим різновидом рефлексії, процесом опосередкування різних граней управління та формування якісно нових результатів діяльності – теоретичних концептів дійсності та практичних моделей її реальних змін. Розкрито низку напрямів і засобів модернізації публічного врядування шляхом запровадження раціональних нововведень. ; Problem setting. An essential feature of Ukrainian nowadays is the process of reforming Ukrainian society, which includes the necessity for conscious planning of the process of modernization and rational substantiation of its irreversibility and civilization. Democratic modernization is characterized by a qualitatively higher level of freedom of all subjects of social-power relations, provides real competition of concepts, programs and projects. Competitive preconditions for development include open discourse and the production of new ideas, extraordinary decisions and approaches. Therefore, the development of public administration and, ultimately, of society as a whole, is largely determined by the possibilities of implementing innovative thinking.Recent research and publications analysis of the mentioned problem has been carried out in the context of consideration of personal qualities of representatives of public governance, where the issue of innovative thinking is a key and determinant for the prospects of the social development. It is widely highlighted in contemporary foreign literature (M. Weber, J. Habermas, B. Gurne) and in the national literature (O. Bahrim, L. Kotyk, V. Oluiko, O. Prodius, I. Romanchuk and others).Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The works of these authors raise important aspects of the development of public governance and the importance for it of innovative thinking. However, there is a need to disclose the essence of the innovative thinking of participants in public governance as an intellectual resource of successful activity and a mean of modernizing society. This general objective of the article corresponds to a number of tasks to be solved, in particular, to demonstrate the specific forms of influence of innovative thinking on the modernization of public governance.Paper main body. The article reveals real prerequisites for the modernization of modern society, in particular, the expansion of the circle of active participants in administrative processes and subjects of innovative attitude to existing realities. Therefore, the management practice of solving issues with the necessity includes an individual approach and a special (every time new) attitude to the situation. Under these conditions, ensuring the effectiveness of managerial decisions and all public governance should be based on a creative approach as an implementation of innovative thinking.The content of innovative thinking is clarified by defining the essence of thinking as an attributive function of a person, which necessarily extends to the specifics of managerial activity. Thinking is defined as a reflection – the logical activity of the correlation of one subject of thought with another, or their mutual mediation. Reflection is multidimensional, it can relate to the discovery of the content of various aspects of the activity, for example, the motive and purpose, purpose and means, results and goals, resources and obstacles, etc.In the structure of public management, innovative thinking plays the role of the driving force of modernization or the main mean for producing a new social reality. As a special kind of reflection, it correlates the general regulatory norms with the practical situation, takes into account the set of other faces and as a result is designed in a specific, synthetic and original solution to a particular task. Innovative thinking performs a number of functions, forms both new theoretical concepts of reality and practical models of its real changes.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Thus, innovative thinking is considered as an effective factor for the development of public governance, since it forms the content of theoretical and practical modernizations, produces new projects and development programs. In public administration, it focuses on the continuous modernization of social-power relations, expansion of the objects of reformation and implementation of the capabilities of its subjects. The prospects for further research are to highlight the peculiarities of the formation of innovative thinking, to specify its connection with other productive opportunities of the subject of social and managerial changes and in detailing the process of implementing innovative projects.

Досліджено особливості та сутність інноваційного мислення як чинника розвитку публічного врядування. Обґрунтовано положення про те, що інноваційне мислення є особливим різновидом рефлексії, процесом опосередкування різних граней управління та формування якісно нових результатів діяльності – теоретичних концептів дійсності та практичних моделей її реальних змін. Розкрито низку напрямів і засобів модернізації публічного врядування шляхом запровадження раціональних нововведень. ; Problem setting. An essential feature of Ukrainian nowadays is the process of reforming Ukrainian society, which includes the necessity for conscious planning of the process of modernization and rational substantiation of its irreversibility and civilization. Democratic modernization is characterized by a qualitatively higher level of freedom of all subjects of social-power relations, provides real competition of concepts, programs and projects. Competitive preconditions for development include open discourse and the production of new ideas, extraordinary decisions and approaches. Therefore, the development of public administration and, ultimately, of society as a whole, is largely determined by the possibilities of implementing innovative thinking.Recent research and publications analysis of the mentioned problem has been carried out in the context of consideration of personal qualities of representatives of public governance, where the issue of innovative thinking is a key and determinant for the prospects of the social development. It is widely highlighted in contemporary foreign literature (M. Weber, J. Habermas, B. Gurne) and in the national literature (O. Bahrim, L. Kotyk, V. Oluiko, O. Prodius, I. Romanchuk and others).Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The works of these authors raise important aspects of the development of public governance and the importance for it of innovative thinking. However, there is a need to disclose the essence of the innovative thinking of participants in public governance as an intellectual resource of successful activity and a mean of modernizing society. This general objective of the article corresponds to a number of tasks to be solved, in particular, to demonstrate the specific forms of influence of innovative thinking on the modernization of public governance.Paper main body. The article reveals real prerequisites for the modernization of modern society, in particular, the expansion of the circle of active participants in administrative processes and subjects of innovative attitude to existing realities. Therefore, the management practice of solving issues with the necessity includes an individual approach and a special (every time new) attitude to the situation. Under these conditions, ensuring the effectiveness of managerial decisions and all public governance should be based on a creative approach as an implementation of innovative thinking.The content of innovative thinking is clarified by defining the essence of thinking as an attributive function of a person, which necessarily extends to the specifics of managerial activity. Thinking is defined as a reflection – the logical activity of the correlation of one subject of thought with another, or their mutual mediation. Reflection is multidimensional, it can relate to the discovery of the content of various aspects of the activity, for example, the motive and purpose, purpose and means, results and goals, resources and obstacles, etc.In the structure of public management, innovative thinking plays the role of the driving force of modernization or the main mean for producing a new social reality. As a special kind of reflection, it correlates the general regulatory norms with the practical situation, takes into account the set of other faces and as a result is designed in a specific, synthetic and original solution to a particular task. Innovative thinking performs a number of functions, forms both new theoretical concepts of reality and practical models of its real changes.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Thus, innovative thinking is considered as an effective factor for the development of public governance, since it forms the content of theoretical and practical modernizations, produces new projects and development programs. In public administration, it focuses on the continuous modernization of social-power relations, expansion of the objects of reformation and implementation of the capabilities of its subjects. The prospects for further research are to highlight the peculiarities of the formation of innovative thinking, to specify its connection with other productive opportunities of the subject of social and managerial changes and in detailing the process of implementing innovative projects.