Governance in deutschen Grenzregionen
In: Vivre et penser la coopération transfrontalière, Vol. 2
In: Studien zur Geschichte der europäischen Integration, Nr. 12
In: Vivre et penser la coopération transfrontalière, Vol. 2
In: Studien zur Geschichte der europäischen Integration, Nr. 12
World Affairs Online
International audience ; Three cities are studed in order to understand their governance of city-branding. The human organisation, the feasibility and the objectives are compared. The difficulties of branding are about the leadership, the restriction in the field of discourse and the capacity to be in conflict. ; A travers trois terrains, la gouvernance de la fabrication de l'image de marque de la ville est questionnée en matière d'organisation, de faisabilité et d'objectifs à atteindre. Les dynamiques territoriales basées sur des organisations politiques permettent de comparer trois démarches qui peinent à aboutir, que ce soit en coopérations intra-territoriales qu'extra-erritoriales
BASE
International audience ; Three cities are studed in order to understand their governance of city-branding. The human organisation, the feasibility and the objectives are compared. The difficulties of branding are about the leadership, the restriction in the field of discourse and the capacity to be in conflict. ; A travers trois terrains, la gouvernance de la fabrication de l'image de marque de la ville est questionnée en matière d'organisation, de faisabilité et d'objectifs à atteindre. Les dynamiques territoriales basées sur des organisations politiques permettent de comparer trois démarches qui peinent à aboutir, que ce soit en coopérations intra-territoriales qu'extra-erritoriales
BASE
International audience ; Three cities are studed in order to understand their governance of city-branding. The human organisation, the feasibility and the objectives are compared. The difficulties of branding are about the leadership, the restriction in the field of discourse and the capacity to be in conflict. ; A travers trois terrains, la gouvernance de la fabrication de l'image de marque de la ville est questionnée en matière d'organisation, de faisabilité et d'objectifs à atteindre. Les dynamiques territoriales basées sur des organisations politiques permettent de comparer trois démarches qui peinent à aboutir, que ce soit en coopérations intra-territoriales qu'extra-erritoriales
BASE
International audience ; Three cities are studed in order to understand their governance of city-branding. The human organisation, the feasibility and the objectives are compared. The difficulties of branding are about the leadership, the restriction in the field of discourse and the capacity to be in conflict. ; A travers trois terrains, la gouvernance de la fabrication de l'image de marque de la ville est questionnée en matière d'organisation, de faisabilité et d'objectifs à atteindre. Les dynamiques territoriales basées sur des organisations politiques permettent de comparer trois démarches qui peinent à aboutir, que ce soit en coopérations intra-territoriales qu'extra-erritoriales
BASE
International audience ; Three cities are studed in order to understand their governance of city-branding. The human organisation, the feasibility and the objectives are compared. The difficulties of branding are about the leadership, the restriction in the field of discourse and the capacity to be in conflict. ; A travers trois terrains, la gouvernance de la fabrication de l'image de marque de la ville est questionnée en matière d'organisation, de faisabilité et d'objectifs à atteindre. Les dynamiques territoriales basées sur des organisations politiques permettent de comparer trois démarches qui peinent à aboutir, que ce soit en coopérations intra-territoriales qu'extra-erritoriales
BASE
In: L' Europe en formation: revue d'études sur la construction européenne et le fédéralisme = journal of studies on European integration and federalism, Band 353 - 354, Heft 3, S. 197-205
ISSN: 2410-9231
Approaches to the definition of the concept of "communication", its essence and approaches of both foreign and domestic scientists are considered and analyzed. The role of communication in society and public policy in particular, its importance in public administration, their relationship is studied. Considerable attention is paid to the role of communication in public policy, as it shapes the publicity of any policy, makes it transparent, open and puts socially significant issues on the agenda for further discussion by the whole society with the participation of public authorities and local governments and public organizations and activists, trade unions, business, political movements and parties, etc. According to the author, public policy is inseparable from communication and communication mechanisms, which, in fact, make public policy public, it is important to consider communication and its role in public policy. In the process of communication in the field of public administration, a special place is occupied by the exchange of information between leaders and those they govern (or between the political system and the environment, the top and citizens). Its goal is to obtain the consent of the latter and decision-making, legitimation and public support, which is needed by all political systems, even totalitarian ones. There are different positions of the rulers and rulers in the political sphere, but common is the presence of communicative processes, because without them the existence of communication is impossible, especially in modern conditions and in countries where democracy, publicity and civil society. At the same time, further research is needed on the communicative component of public policy, in particular – from the standpoint of citizens and the media, civil society institutions. The development of communication issues in the plane of "power – society" is conditioned by the need to develop communicative processes in modern Ukraine on the basis of world experience and the peculiarities of the ...
BASE
This chapter reviews empirical literature on foreign aid and QoG. The chapter begins with a description of how scholarship on foreign aid and QoG developed in conjunction with prominent debates in the development community. The chapter discusses three major debates: whether or not QoG moderates foreign aid effectiveness, whether or not donors give aid selectively based on QoG, and whether or not foreign aid undermines or can help build QoG. With regard to aid effectiveness, the most recent literature suggests that aid can be effective even under conditions of poor QoG. With regard to selectivity, the existing literature shows an increasing selectivity for overall aid flows since the end of the Cold War and provides evidence of selectivity in terms of type of aid. The evidence that aid undermines QoG is not as strong as has been claimed by some of the initial studies in this literature. The chapter concludes by suggesting ways forward for all three literatures.
BASE
The article points out that the process of introducing market relations in Ukraine and the growing role and importance of joint-stock companies in the economic development of the country and well-being of its citizens have created the need of corporate governance that emerged due to changing ownership structures and transition to market relations.The study shows that the corporate form of business organization is a new and complex phenomenon in Ukraine. Corporations (joint-stock companies) are the most widespread and significant form of business organization in the current conditions. It is emphasized that the defining feature of a corporation is that it is owned by shareholders who bought stock. This requires a completely different approach to management and control. The nature, role and principles of corporate governance framework are described. It is reasoned that since management and ownership are separated, there is a need to balance interests of shareholders and management.It is stressed that corporate governance is an important factor in the company's activity and development, the primary purpose of which is to provide owners with the opportunity to organize and exercise effective control over management. The essence of corporate governance is to achieve a balance of interests for participants of corporate governance, namely: shareholders, managers, supervisory board and other groups and individuals (suppliers, consumers, creditors, government authorities, etc). The role and place of management in corporate governance, their interests and powers are highlighted.The following responsibilities are associated with executive bodies, or management: solving currents problems related to the corporation's activities, ensuring decision-making by general meeting of shareholders and supervisory board, planning, organizing, motivating, coordinating, and monitoring.It is substantiated that management and corporate governance are different concepts. The key difference is that corporate governance is a wider concept, and management is an integral part of it. The effectiveness of corporate governance rests on the organization of the work of management.
BASE
In: Politique étrangère: PE ; revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut Français des Relations Internationales, Band 79, Heft 4, S. 206-207
ISSN: 0032-342X
In: Politique étrangère: PE ; revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut Français des Relations Internationales, Heft 2, S. 199-200
ISSN: 0032-342X
In: Revue d'économie politique, Band 122, Heft 2, S. 197-212
ISSN: 2105-2883
Gouvernance et normes comme déterminants de l'armement Dans cet article, nous explorerons deux facteurs qui limitent l'armement et plus généralement, les coûts de la mise en œuvre intra-et entre les Etats: la gouvernance ou les organisations et institutions formelles contribuant à définir et à mettre en œuvre les droits de propriété, et les normes ainsi que les arrangements informels pour résoudre les litiges potentiels. Nous examinerons les effets de ces deux facteurs dans un modèle de conflit statique simple dans lequel les deux parties choisissent les niveaux d'armement et décident si elles s'engagent dans un conflit réel ou le résolvent sous la menace du conflit. Nous démontrerons que l'armement dépend sévèrement de la gouvernance et des normes, et qu'en conséquence, les sociétés aux relations potentiellement conflictuelles peuvent indifféremment engager des dépenses élevées ou basses dans la sécurité sans qu'il y ait de différence dans les niveaux de sécurité dont elles jouissent. Nous explorerons aussi comment les investissements dans la gouvernance peuvent réduire l'armement.