Suchergebnisse

State territory — Territorial waters — Jurisdiction over — Inter-oceanic waterway — Navigable channel — Beagle Channel between Argentina and Chile — Islands at mouth of channel.Jurisdiction — Territorial — Over national waters — Maritime jurisdiction — Uti possidetis juris doctrineTreaties — In general — Title — Significance of — Preamble — Relevance ofTreaties — Interpretation — Principles and rules of interpretation — Interpretation by principles of Vienna Convention of 1969 on the law of treaties — Bases of negotiationTreaties — Interpretation of — Bilingual treaties — Varying versions — Maps and charts as evidence of contents — Confirmatory or corroborative incidents and material — Relevance of speech by Minister of Foreign AffairsTreaties — Special kinds of — Arbitration treaties — Denunciation of general treaty not affecting pending arbitration proceedingsDisputes — Arbitration — Law applied by arbitral tribunals — Decision in accordance with international law — Other matters to be taken into accountDisputes — Arbitration — Acceptance of arbitrationDisputes — Arbitration — Arbitration treaty — Denunciation of general treaty not affecting pending arbitration proceedingsDisputes — Arbitration — Appointment 'of members of Court of Arbitration — Death of a memberDisputes — Arbitration — Procedure — Visit to locus — Expenses — LanguageDisputes — Arbitration — Evidence — Boundary dispute — Relevance of cartography — The "time frame" — Maps and Admiralty charts — Memorandum by Admiralty hydrographer — Acts of jurisdiction as confirming or corroborative evidenceDisputes — Arbitration — The award — Declaration that decision constitutes the award — dispositif.State territory — Parts of — Water boundaries — Definition of boundary by arbitration — Tracing of boundary — Straight base lines — The Beagle Channel between Argentina and Chile — Islands at mouth of channel

This article tries to analyze Italian government's stance after Albania's de facto withdrawal from the Warsaw Treaty in 1961 and de jure denunciation of this treaty in 1968. The retreat of Soviet troops from Vlora Naval Base had a considerable impact on Italy's foreign relations with Albania in many regards. Concerning internal interests, Italy had a close relationship with Albania and had always demonstrated the willingness to enhance her influence in this respect. On the other hand, for Italy being a NATO member country, Albania's withdrawal from the Warsaw Treaty was an enormous relief. The possibility that the two superpowers clash on the Adriatic Sea was considerably minimized. This led to a genuine interest in Albania. Albanian political immigrants in Italy played a major role in enhancing this attention. Nevertheless, because of the communist regime in Albania, the rapprochement wanted by Italy remained merely a desire which did not exceed bilateral economic relations. Viewed as an opportunity for Albania to open up to the West, this effort constitutes another chance deliberately "missed" by the regime at home. DOI:10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n2p155

International Rivers — Freedom of Navigation on — Rhine Navigation Convention — Denunciation by Germany — Revival of the Treaty.Treaties — Termination of — Unilateral Denunciation of Rhine Navigation Convention by Germany in 1936 — Application of the Convention as between Other Parties — Suspension of Treaty during the Second World War — Restoration of the Treaty

У статті автор детально аналізує сучасну практику денонсації міжнародних договорів між Україною та Росією, звертаючись до міжнародно-правових положень та політичних чинників, що впливають на цю практику, на прикладі денонсації угод щодо розміщення Чорноморського флоту РФ та Договору про дружбу між Україною та РФ. Автор робить висновок про необхідність відповідної реакції на небезпечне політичне розуміння інституту денонсації, яке не повинно ототожнюватися з наявною політичною складовою цього інституту. ; В статье автор детально анализирует современную практику денонсации международных договоров между Украиной и Россией, обращаясь к положениям международного права и политическим факторам, которые влияют на эту практику. На примере денонсации Соглашений о размещении Черноморского флота РФ и Договора о дружбе между Украиной и РФ автор делает вывод о необходимости соответствующей реакции на опасное политическое понимание института денонсации, которое не должно отождествляться с присутствующей политической составляющей этого института. ; In the article the Author analyzes a modern practice of denunciation of international treaties between Ukraine and Russia through consideration of international law and political factors, which affect this practice; the examples of Treaties of disposal of Black Sea Navy Fleet and Treaty of Friendship between Ukraine and Russia are prominent. The Author concludes that the relevant reaction on political interpretation of the denunciation institute, which is dangerous, is necessary, and can not be understood as equal to existing political component of this institute.

У статті автор детально аналізує сучасну практику денонсації міжнародних договорів між Україною та Росією, звертаючись до міжнародно-правових положень та політичних чинників, що впливають на цю практику, на прикладі денонсації угод щодо розміщення Чорноморського флоту РФ та Договору про дружбу між Україною та РФ. Автор робить висновок про необхідність відповідної реакції на небезпечне політичне розуміння інституту денонсації, яке не повинно ототожнюватися з наявною політичною складовою цього інституту. ; В статье автор детально анализирует современную практику денонсации международных договоров между Украиной и Россией, обращаясь к положениям международного права и политическим факторам, которые влияют на эту практику. На примере денонсации Соглашений о размещении Черноморского флота РФ и Договора о дружбе между Украиной и РФ автор делает вывод о необходимости соответствующей реакции на опасное политическое понимание института денонсации, которое не должно отождествляться с присутствующей политической составляющей этого института. ; In the article the Author analyzes a modern practice of denunciation of international treaties between Ukraine and Russia through consideration of international law and political factors, which affect this practice; the examples of Treaties of disposal of Black Sea Navy Fleet and Treaty of Friendship between Ukraine and Russia are prominent. The Author concludes that the relevant reaction on political interpretation of the denunciation institute, which is dangerous, is necessary, and can not be understood as equal to existing political component of this institute.

Aliens — Treatment of — Right of Non-resident Alien to Inherit Property from Resident of State Concerned — Reciprocal Right of Inheritance — Establishment by Treaty — Applicability to Persons Resident in Territory Controlled by Unrecognized Government — Effect of Civil War on Treaties — Effect of Foreign Assets Control on Right of Alien to Inherit Property — The Law of the United States of America.Treaties — Operation and Enforcement of — Treaty Establishing Reciprocal Right of Inheritance — Applicability to Persons Resident in Territory Controlled by Unrecognized Government — Effect of Civil War on Treaties — The Law of the United States of America.Treaties — Termination of — Denunciation by Unrecognized Government.Recognition — Of Governments — Non-Recognition — Effect of — Rights Created by Treaty — Reciprocal Right of Inheritance — Applicability to Persons Resident in Territory Controlled by Unrecognized Government — Effect of Civil War on Treaties — Denunciation by Unrecognized Government — Effect of Foreign Assets Control on Right of Alien to Inherit Property — The Law of the United States of America.

AbstractThis article examines the legality of the options that may be open to a State that is unwilling to accept a legal obligation created by a human rights treaty it has already ratified. It briefly addresses the subject of 'derogation' from human rights treaties before looking in detail at denunciation of the same. It proceeds to examine the legality of strategies such as entering a late reservation to a human rights treaty and of denouncing the treaty with the sole purpose of entering a new reservation to it.

International Law — Relation to Municipal Law — Subordination of Jurisdiction of Municipal Courts to Treaty Obligations — Revised Convention of Mannheim, 1868.164International Rivers — Freedom of Navigation — Rhine Navigation Convention — Jurisdiction of Courts of Riparian States — Refusal of Jurisdiction — Denunciation of Rhine Navigation Convention by Germany — Restoration of Regime after the Second World War.