Suchergebnisse

This thesis sheds light on the relationship between subjective wellbeing and political behaviour and attitudes in contemporary European democracies. The profound societal changes of the last half a decade and the unanswered questions about why some citizens engage more politically while others do not, and how persons develop into politically efficacious citizens, as well as why a part of the electorate is attracted to right-wing populist parties and ideas, have paved the way for considering citizen's subjective wellbeing as a powerful, yet so far overlooked, predictor of political attitudes and behaviour. Through four empirical studies, this research links several dimensions of subjective wellbeing, including its evaluative, emotional, eudemonic and social components, to a sense of political efficacy (Study 1), to political participation (Studies 2 and 3) and to a right-wing populist vote choice (Study 4). The empirical studies reveal how subjective wellbeing is a significant driver of citizen's political orientations, their participation patterns, as well as their electoral choices, thereby being highly relevant at all stages of the development of the political citizen. The implications of this relationship are profound, both from a scholarly and a policy-making perspective, in order to better understand persisting political inequality in contemporary democracies, to identify the origins of democratic support or instability, as well as to shed light on the development of illiberal political ideas and threats to liberal democracy. In this way, subjective wellbeing emerges as a crucial research agenda for the future of political science. Cette recherche porte sur le rôle du bien-être subjectif en tant que déterminant du comportement et des attitudes politiques dans l'Europe contemporaine. Les changements profonds de la société durant les dernières décennies et les questions qui demeurent dans les études du comportement politique ouvrent la voie à considérer le bien-être comme un facteur important, pourtant ...

International audience ; Between March 15 and May 11, 2020, a strict national lockdown was implemented in France by the government in order to combat the spread of the coronavirus. Children and adults were under house arrest and were only allowed to go out for one hour a day outside of compelling reasons. This article seeks to understand the (socially differentiated) effects of the health crisis and measures restricting individual freedoms on the level of wellbeing of high school students. Based on an exploratory survey carried out during the lockdown among students enrolled in an establishment in western France (N=507), two important results are underlined. On the one hand, the coronavirus crisis has had uneven effects on the level of wellbeing of adolescents according to their gender and their level of education. On the other hand, the strongest drop in the level of wellbeing hits those who already indicated a lower level of wellbeing before the lockdown, so that lockdown measures not only reproduce inequalities, but also seem to strengthen them, starting in adolescence. ; Entre le 15 mars et le 11 mai 2020, un confinement complet a été mis en place en France par le gouvernement dans le but de lutter contre la propagation du coronavirus. Enfants et adultes étaient assignés à résidence et n'avaient le droit de sortir qu'une heure par jour en dehors de motifs impérieux. Cet article propose de saisir l'effet (socialement différencié) de la crise sanitaire et des mesures de restriction de liberté sur le niveau de bien-être de lycéen·ne·s. À partir d'une enquête exploratoire réalisée, pendant la période de confinement, auprès d'élèves scolarisés dans un établissement de l'Ouest de la France (N = 507), il souligne deux résultats importants. D'une part, la crise sanitaire a eu des effets inégaux sur le niveau de bien être des adolescent·e·s selon leur sexe et leur niveau scolaire. D'autre part, la baisse plus forte du niveau de bien-être frappe celles et ceux qui indiquaient déjà un niveau de bien-être plus faible ...

International audience ; Between March 15 and May 11, 2020, a strict national lockdown was implemented in France by the government in order to combat the spread of the coronavirus. Children and adults were under house arrest and were only allowed to go out for one hour a day outside of compelling reasons. This article seeks to understand the (socially differentiated) effects of the health crisis and measures restricting individual freedoms on the level of wellbeing of high school students. Based on an exploratory survey carried out during the lockdown among students enrolled in an establishment in western France (N=507), two important results are underlined. On the one hand, the coronavirus crisis has had uneven effects on the level of wellbeing of adolescents according to their gender and their level of education. On the other hand, the strongest drop in the level of wellbeing hits those who already indicated a lower level of wellbeing before the lockdown, so that lockdown measures not only reproduce inequalities, but also seem to strengthen them, starting in adolescence. ; Entre le 15 mars et le 11 mai 2020, un confinement complet a été mis en place en France par le gouvernement dans le but de lutter contre la propagation du coronavirus. Enfants et adultes étaient assignés à résidence et n'avaient le droit de sortir qu'une heure par jour en dehors de motifs impérieux. Cet article propose de saisir l'effet (socialement différencié) de la crise sanitaire et des mesures de restriction de liberté sur le niveau de bien-être de lycéen·ne·s. À partir d'une enquête exploratoire réalisée, pendant la période de confinement, auprès d'élèves scolarisés dans un établissement de l'Ouest de la France (N = 507), il souligne deux résultats importants. D'une part, la crise sanitaire a eu des effets inégaux sur le niveau de bien être des adolescent·e·s selon leur sexe et leur niveau scolaire. D'autre part, la baisse plus forte du niveau de bien-être frappe celles et ceux qui indiquaient déjà un niveau de bien-être plus faible ...

International audience ; Between March 15 and May 11, 2020, a strict national lockdown was implemented in France by the government in order to combat the spread of the coronavirus. Children and adults were under house arrest and were only allowed to go out for one hour a day outside of compelling reasons. This article seeks to understand the (socially differentiated) effects of the health crisis and measures restricting individual freedoms on the level of wellbeing of high school students. Based on an exploratory survey carried out during the lockdown among students enrolled in an establishment in western France (N=507), two important results are underlined. On the one hand, the coronavirus crisis has had uneven effects on the level of wellbeing of adolescents according to their gender and their level of education. On the other hand, the strongest drop in the level of wellbeing hits those who already indicated a lower level of wellbeing before the lockdown, so that lockdown measures not only reproduce inequalities, but also seem to strengthen them, starting in adolescence. ; Entre le 15 mars et le 11 mai 2020, un confinement complet a été mis en place en France par le gouvernement dans le but de lutter contre la propagation du coronavirus. Enfants et adultes étaient assignés à résidence et n'avaient le droit de sortir qu'une heure par jour en dehors de motifs impérieux. Cet article propose de saisir l'effet (socialement différencié) de la crise sanitaire et des mesures de restriction de liberté sur le niveau de bien-être de lycéen·ne·s. À partir d'une enquête exploratoire réalisée, pendant la période de confinement, auprès d'élèves scolarisés dans un établissement de l'Ouest de la France (N = 507), il souligne deux résultats importants. D'une part, la crise sanitaire a eu des effets inégaux sur le niveau de bien être des adolescent·e·s selon leur sexe et leur niveau scolaire. D'autre part, la baisse plus forte du niveau de bien-être frappe celles et ceux qui indiquaient déjà un niveau de bien-être plus faible ...

International audience Between March 15 and May 11, 2020, a strict national lockdown was implemented in France by the government in order to combat the spread of the coronavirus. Children and adults were under house arrest and were only allowed to go out for one hour a day outside of compelling reasons. This article seeks to understand the (socially differentiated) effects of the health crisis and measures restricting individual freedoms on the level of wellbeing of high school students. Based on an exploratory survey carried out during the lockdown among students enrolled in an establishment in western France (N=507), two important results are underlined. On the one hand, the coronavirus crisis has had uneven effects on the level of wellbeing of adolescents according to their gender and their level of education. On the other hand, the strongest drop in the level of wellbeing hits those who already indicated a lower level of wellbeing before the lockdown, so that lockdown measures not only reproduce inequalities, but also seem to strengthen them, starting in adolescence. ; Entre le 15 mars et le 11 mai 2020, un confinement complet a été mis en place en France par le gouvernement dans le but de lutter contre la propagation du coronavirus. Enfants et adultes étaient assignés à résidence et n'avaient le droit de sortir qu'une heure par jour en dehors de motifs impérieux. Cet article propose de saisir l'effet (socialement différencié) de la crise sanitaire et des mesures de restriction de liberté sur le niveau de bien-être de lycéen·ne·s. À partir d'une enquête exploratoire réalisée, pendant la période de confinement, auprès d'élèves scolarisés dans un établissement de l'Ouest de la France (N = 507), il souligne deux résultats importants. D'une part, la crise sanitaire a eu des effets inégaux sur le niveau de bien être des adolescent·e·s selon leur sexe et leur niveau scolaire. D'autre part, la baisse plus forte du niveau de bien-être frappe celles et ceux qui indiquaient déjà un niveau de bien-être plus faible ...

Regardless of our culture or way of life, we have to "live" somewhere, and for more than half of the world's population, their life takes place in a city. Urban areas are attractive for many reasons, but they also concentrate many problems of pollution, poor health conditions and social challenges. Above all, it is clear that people do not benefit equally of good living conditions, and the distribution of urban quality reveals significant disparities. How then could we define what is a good living environment in favor of people's wellbeing? Wellbeing is an ambiguous concept for which no unique and absolute indicator can ever be found, but the question of its assessment remains. Urban planning that designs and shapes the places we live in, public health with its definition of health as complete well-being, or philosophy that, since Aristote described what makes a life a "good life", we have access to many ways of considering the concept of wellbeing. For epistemological and ethical reasons, we have chosen to study urban wellbeing starting from the people in their living environment. Our work focuses on the French designated "priority" neighborhoods, because of the spatial and social inequalities observed on those territories. This thesis is based on several participatory action-researches conducted with municipalities near Paris and La Rochelle about urban public actions and urban renovation programs. Our work is particularly underpinned by the realization of Health Impact Assessments (HIA) of two urban projects, for which we chose to experiment an open approach with the implication of municipal agents and local actors. The objective was also to research the conditions of collective learning about the links between health, wellbeing and urbanism. This work relies on literature data, but also on people's experience of their living environment that we collected through ethnographical types of field survey. The stories that we gathered draw the attention to the relation between people and their neighborhood, and ...

Regardless of our culture or way of life, we have to "live" somewhere, and for more than half of the world's population, their life takes place in a city. Urban areas are attractive for many reasons, but they also concentrate many problems of pollution, poor health conditions and social challenges. Above all, it is clear that people do not benefit equally of good living conditions, and the distribution of urban quality reveals significant disparities. How then could we define what is a good living environment in favor of people's wellbeing? Wellbeing is an ambiguous concept for which no unique and absolute indicator can ever be found, but the question of its assessment remains. Urban planning that designs and shapes the places we live in, public health with its definition of health as complete well-being, or philosophy that, since Aristote described what makes a life a "good life", we have access to many ways of considering the concept of wellbeing. For epistemological and ethical reasons, we have chosen to study urban wellbeing starting from the people in their living environment. Our work focuses on the French designated "priority" neighborhoods, because of the spatial and social inequalities observed on those territories. This thesis is based on several participatory action-researches conducted with municipalities near Paris and La Rochelle about urban public actions and urban renovation programs. Our work is particularly underpinned by the realization of Health Impact Assessments (HIA) of two urban projects, for which we chose to experiment an open approach with the implication of municipal agents and local actors. The objective was also to research the conditions of collective learning about the links between health, wellbeing and urbanism. This work relies on literature data, but also on people's experience of their living environment that we collected through ethnographical types of field survey. The stories that we gathered draw the attention to the relation between people and their neighborhood, and ...

Regardless of our culture or way of life, we have to "live" somewhere, and for more than half of the world's population, their life takes place in a city. Urban areas are attractive for many reasons, but they also concentrate many problems of pollution, poor health conditions and social challenges. Above all, it is clear that people do not benefit equally of good living conditions, and the distribution of urban quality reveals significant disparities. How then could we define what is a good living environment in favor of people's wellbeing? Wellbeing is an ambiguous concept for which no unique and absolute indicator can ever be found, but the question of its assessment remains. Urban planning that designs and shapes the places we live in, public health with its definition of health as complete well-being, or philosophy that, since Aristote described what makes a life a "good life", we have access to many ways of considering the concept of wellbeing. For epistemological and ethical reasons, we have chosen to study urban wellbeing starting from the people in their living environment. Our work focuses on the French designated "priority" neighborhoods, because of the spatial and social inequalities observed on those territories. This thesis is based on several participatory action-researches conducted with municipalities near Paris and La Rochelle about urban public actions and urban renovation programs. Our work is particularly underpinned by the realization of Health Impact Assessments (HIA) of two urban projects, for which we chose to experiment an open approach with the implication of municipal agents and local actors. The objective was also to research the conditions of collective learning about the links between health, wellbeing and urbanism. This work relies on literature data, but also on people's experience of their living environment that we collected through ethnographical types of field survey. The stories that we gathered draw the attention to the relation between people and their neighborhood, and ...

Regardless of our culture or way of life, we have to "live" somewhere, and for more than half of the world's population, their life takes place in a city. Urban areas are attractive for many reasons, but they also concentrate many problems of pollution, poor health conditions and social challenges. Above all, it is clear that people do not benefit equally of good living conditions, and the distribution of urban quality reveals significant disparities. How then could we define what is a good living environment in favor of people's wellbeing? Wellbeing is an ambiguous concept for which no unique and absolute indicator can ever be found, but the question of its assessment remains. Urban planning that designs and shapes the places we live in, public health with its definition of health as complete well-being, or philosophy that, since Aristote described what makes a life a "good life", we have access to many ways of considering the concept of wellbeing. For epistemological and ethical reasons, we have chosen to study urban wellbeing starting from the people in their living environment. Our work focuses on the French designated "priority" neighborhoods, because of the spatial and social inequalities observed on those territories. This thesis is based on several participatory action-researches conducted with municipalities near Paris and La Rochelle about urban public actions and urban renovation programs. Our work is particularly underpinned by the realization of Health Impact Assessments (HIA) of two urban projects, for which we chose to experiment an open approach with the implication of municipal agents and local actors. The objective was also to research the conditions of collective learning about the links between health, wellbeing and urbanism. This work relies on literature data, but also on people's experience of their living environment that we collected through ethnographical types of field survey. The stories that we gathered draw the attention to the relation between people and their neighborhood, and ...

The operations of urban renewal in France constitute an interesting example to raise the question of the relations between societies, wellbeing and territory. From the presentation of a urbain project, the GPV Malakoff Pré Gauchet, this presentation will be to underline the problems and difficulties which arise for the actors of the project, at the institutions, for the production of the wellbeing and the sustainable development of the territories. ; constituent un cadre intéressant pour poser la question des relations entre société, bien-être et territoire, par les formes de recomposition des ordres sociaux et territoriaux dont elles sont à l'origine et les défis qu'elles posent aux institutions. C'est précisément le cas du grand Projet de Ville Malakoff Pré Gauchet à Nantes, une vaste opération réalisée dans le cadre de la Politique de la Ville visant à requalifier un secteur urbain et qui voit surgir une tension entre des logiques de développement (projet social) et d'aménagement (transformation urbaine), confrontant les acteurs publics et privés aux défis de la production partenariale du bien-être des habitants.

The operations of urban renewal in France constitute an interesting example to raise the question of the relations between societies, wellbeing and territory. From the presentation of a urbain project, the GPV Malakoff Pré Gauchet, this presentation will be to underline the problems and difficulties which arise for the actors of the project, at the institutions, for the production of the wellbeing and the sustainable development of the territories. ; constituent un cadre intéressant pour poser la question des relations entre société, bien-être et territoire, par les formes de recomposition des ordres sociaux et territoriaux dont elles sont à l'origine et les défis qu'elles posent aux institutions. C'est précisément le cas du grand Projet de Ville Malakoff Pré Gauchet à Nantes, une vaste opération réalisée dans le cadre de la Politique de la Ville visant à requalifier un secteur urbain et qui voit surgir une tension entre des logiques de développement (projet social) et d'aménagement (transformation urbaine), confrontant les acteurs publics et privés aux défis de la production partenariale du bien-être des habitants.

The operations of urban renewal in France constitute an interesting example to raise the question of the relations between societies, wellbeing and territory. From the presentation of a urbain project, the GPV Malakoff Pré Gauchet, this presentation will be to underline the problems and difficulties which arise for the actors of the project, at the institutions, for the production of the wellbeing and the sustainable development of the territories. ; constituent un cadre intéressant pour poser la question des relations entre société, bien-être et territoire, par les formes de recomposition des ordres sociaux et territoriaux dont elles sont à l'origine et les défis qu'elles posent aux institutions. C'est précisément le cas du grand Projet de Ville Malakoff Pré Gauchet à Nantes, une vaste opération réalisée dans le cadre de la Politique de la Ville visant à requalifier un secteur urbain et qui voit surgir une tension entre des logiques de développement (projet social) et d'aménagement (transformation urbaine), confrontant les acteurs publics et privés aux défis de la production partenariale du bien-être des habitants.

The operations of urban renewal in France constitute an interesting example to raise the question of the relations between societies, wellbeing and territory. From the presentation of a urbain project, the GPV Malakoff Pré Gauchet, this presentation will be to underline the problems and difficulties which arise for the actors of the project, at the institutions, for the production of the wellbeing and the sustainable development of the territories. ; constituent un cadre intéressant pour poser la question des relations entre société, bien-être et territoire, par les formes de recomposition des ordres sociaux et territoriaux dont elles sont à l'origine et les défis qu'elles posent aux institutions. C'est précisément le cas du grand Projet de Ville Malakoff Pré Gauchet à Nantes, une vaste opération réalisée dans le cadre de la Politique de la Ville visant à requalifier un secteur urbain et qui voit surgir une tension entre des logiques de développement (projet social) et d'aménagement (transformation urbaine), confrontant les acteurs publics et privés aux défis de la production partenariale du bien-être des habitants.

The operations of urban renewal in France constitute an interesting example to raise the question of the relations between societies, wellbeing and territory. From the presentation of a urbain project, the GPV Malakoff Pré Gauchet, this presentation will be to underline the problems and difficulties which arise for the actors of the project, at the institutions, for the production of the wellbeing and the sustainable development of the territories. ; constituent un cadre intéressant pour poser la question des relations entre société, bien-être et territoire, par les formes de recomposition des ordres sociaux et territoriaux dont elles sont à l'origine et les défis qu'elles posent aux institutions. C'est précisément le cas du grand Projet de Ville Malakoff Pré Gauchet à Nantes, une vaste opération réalisée dans le cadre de la Politique de la Ville visant à requalifier un secteur urbain et qui voit surgir une tension entre des logiques de développement (projet social) et d'aménagement (transformation urbaine), confrontant les acteurs publics et privés aux défis de la production partenariale du bien-être des habitants.