Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
SSRN
Why Xenophobia?
In: Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2021-05
SSRN
Working paper
Governing Xenophobia
In: Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2018 Forthcoming)
SSRN
SSRN
In the wake of xenophobia
In: UN Chronicle, Band 44, Heft 3, S. 22-23
ISSN: 1564-3913
Immigration and Xenophobia
In: Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe, S. 69-106
Xenophobia and Left Voting
In: Politics & society, Band 38, Heft 4, S. 490-516
ISSN: 1552-7514
In this article, the authors set out to evaluate two competing mechanisms that may account for the negative relationship between xenophobia and left voting. Xenophobia may reduce left voting because parties of the right are more conservative on issues relating to immigration and ethnic relations (the policy-bundling effect), or it may reduce left voting because many potential left voters lack sympathy with the groups to whom redistribution is thought to be directed (the anti-solidarity effect). These two mechanisms imply radically different scenarios for political competition. Using a multilevel modeling approach, the authors analyze the data compiled in fifteen different surveys carried out in ten Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries between 1990 and 2000. This study is the first to draw out the implications of these mechanisms for left voting and to subject them to empirical scrutiny in a large-scale comparative study. The results are consistent with the existence of a relatively strong policy-bundling effect; by contrast, the anti-solidarity effect is trivial in most of the surveys analyzed.
Xenophobia as a Catch-22
Western democratic nation-states are governing (im)migrations through systemic indifference (a new form of systemic xenophobia and systemic racism). Majority self-aware ethnic groups (led by elites, i.e., the nation, the executive, the government) apply formal social control with total indifference to (and in contradiction with) social order and the rule of law. Social order and the rule of law are not honored (refusal of entry in humanitarian crisis, border outsourcing, and permanent state of exception in borders) or, in other cases, they are (dubiously) honored (approval of deportations) but not enforced. This systemic indifference has led to a Catch-22 in which immigrants are trapped (necropolitics, permanent state of exception in EU and US outside borders, border outsourcing, and hopeless free wandering in which immigrants may challenge, unintentionally and inadvertently, the internal social order). Western democratic nation-states show their deep internal contradictions in times of mass migrations, aged (and fast-aging) societies, populisms, authoritarianism, extremism and the reinforcement of whiteness. In XXI century, Western democratic nation-states´ weakness is an important challenge in front of other political systems (China with its Chinese Marxism, authoritarian regimes like Russia, Turkey…) which are gaining momentum. The EU and the US confront a catharsis of their traditional social and political paradigms: from national to post-national and multicultural societies. Majority self-aware ethnic groups oppose this paradigm change with systemic indifference, systemic xenophobia and systemic racism. ; Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech.
BASE
New Xenophobia in Europe
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 471
ISSN: 1036-1146
'New Xenophobia in Europe' edited by Bernd Baumgartl and Adrian Favell is reviewed.
An Australian Sense of Xenophobia
In: Development: journal of the Society for International Development (SID), Band 52, Heft 4, S. 479-482
ISSN: 1461-7072
SSRN
Working paper
Xenophobia as a Basis of Solidarity
In: Russian social science review: a journal of translations, Band 56, Heft 4, S. 37
ISSN: 1061-1428