Suchergebnisse

Перед Україною та її міжнародними партнерами постало безпрецедентне завдання: рухатися вперед в процесах відновлення та вступу до ЄС, а також забезпечувати критично важливу військову та фінансову підтримку, щоб допомогти Україні захистити свій суверенітет від російської військової агресії. Невизначеність щодо того, коли і як закінчиться війна, ще більше ускладнює планування щодо відновлення та членства в ЄС, проте також підкреслює необхідність їх інтеграції. Беручи до уваги спільну спрямованість на трансформаційну модернізацію, обидва процеси можуть взаємопідсилюватись. Виходячи з цього, ЄС затвердив Ukraine Facility для забезпечення надійного фінансування України до 2027 року з метою підтримки відновлення та ключових інституційних і адміністративних реформ, необхідних для вступу України до ЄС. Основою реалізації обох напрямків є так званий План України українського Уряду. Однак, відновлення і вступ до ЄС не призведуть до автоматичної синергії, в гіршому випадку вони можуть надмірно перенапружити спроможність українського Уряду і приватного сектору, а також підтримку громадськості. Щоб доcягти максимальної синергії між цими процесами, політичним діячам слід взяти до уваги такі рекомендації: ● Встановлення пріоритетів, які відповідаютькороткостроковим вимогам та мають довгостроковіамбіції. Пріоритетними повинні бути заходи звідновлення, які підвищують безпеку, забезпечуютьосновні потреби людей і мають вирішальне значення дляукраїнської економіки. У рамках переговорів про вступ доЄС пріоритетними повинні бути «основні принципи» ірозділи, що стимулюють економічне зростання іконкурентоспроможність, оскільки використання процесувступу для стимулювання економічного зростаннясьогодні може безпосередньо сприяти трансформаційнійперебудові, і навпаки. ● Забезпечення участі суспільства в реалізації ПлануУкраїни. Уряди Німеччини та України, якспіворганізатори Конференції з відновлення України (URC) у червні 2024 року, повинні переконатися, що URC є відправною точкою для інституціоналізації інклюзивного підходу до реалізації Плану України. Цього можна досягти шляхом створення коаліцій різноманітних учасників на багатьох рівнях управління в Україні, орієнтованих на вирішення конкретних проблем поза межами цьогорічної Конференції URC. ● Залучення міжнародних донорів до підтримки Плану України, відновлення та вступу України до ЄС.Німеччина, як держава-член ЄС і G7, може стативажливою ланкою між прихильниками відновленняУкраїни з ЄС та країнами, що не входять в ЄС. Держави-члени ЄС повинні привести свою двосторонню допомогуУкраїні у відповідність з Планом України.● Розробка спеціальної технічної допомоги та розбудова потенціалу. Карта активів, розробленаспільно українськими та міжнародними учасниками, повинна виявляти і систематизувати сильні сторони таневикористаний потенціал (наприклад, щодоінфраструктури, державного фінансування, промисловоїта комерційної діяльності) у конкретних регіонах,муніципалітетах та у приватному секторі, беручи до увагистратегії розвитку, які розроблялися на різних рівнях управляння протягом останніх місяців. Heобхідним єзалучення української діаспори в країнах ЄС до участі в цих процесах, не обумовлюючи це нереалістичнимиочікуваннями щодо швидкого і масштабного повернення. ● Підготовка проміжних кроків на шляху вступуУкраїни до ЄС. Уряду Німеччини слід продовжуватипросувати дискусію між інституціями ЄС і державами-членами про проміжні кроки щодо поступового вступуУкраїни в ЄС перед офіційнім вступом, включаючиінтеграцію України в єдиний ринок ЄС. ● Застосування відкритої та прозорої комунікації.Спираючись на відкритий і прозорий діалог УрядуУкраїни та ЄС, необхідно розробити стратегію комунікаціїз українським народом, щоб заручитися його підтримкоющодо вступу до ЄС. Ефективна комунікація всередині ЄСнеобхідна для обмеження по.

This publication, co-published with Ukrainian platform CANactions, brings together wide-ranging essays on the subject of post-war reconstruction. Produced in the light of the current invasion of Ukraine, it covers a spectrum of historical examples and geographic contexts to navigate the challenges and opportunities that define post-war reconstruction and war-related issues within the field of architecture. Considering urban planning, education, building materials, and innovative spatial relations, it centres around the human experience of the built environment in the aftermath of war. With a preface by editor Bohdan Kryzhanovsky, this reader presents theoretical and practical explorations of an urgently timely topic, offering a basis for wider conversation as well as a handbook of ideas for architects and planners and a pragmatic guide for shaping the future of Ukrainian cities

Збірка документів з архівів України про період «совєтизації» Закарпаття в різних сферах суспільно-політичного життя у 1944–1954 роках, а саме: з Центрального державного архіву вищих органів влади і управління України, Галузевого державного архіву Служби безпеки України, Державного архіву Закарпатської області, архіву Управління Служби безпеки України в Закарпатській області, Центрального державного кінофотофоноархіву України імені Г. С. Пшеничного, а також приватних колекцій Володимира Бірчака, Тараса Сегляника, Наталії Тирпак, Георгія Рогача та ін.

Tradition and literature are not held back by borders. Transnationality is, for example, geographic, symbolic, or linguistic movement and action. Different kinds of cultural transitions and migrant traditions are connected with transnationality. Studying the multilingualism of literary texts or diverse cultural identities, transnationality is a prolific angle. In the 102nd Yearbook of the Kalevala Society Foundation, the topics cover for example migration and return migration, material things crossing borders, and places of music culture. At a more theoretical level we are asking how studying transnationality enriches the disciplines with roots in the national sciences.

Tourism must be planned and developed differently from what is customary today, as growth in rigid economic terms is still prioritised over the cultural and socioecological sustainability of lived-in cultural and natural environments. The global ecological crisis can no longer be ignored by tourism developers and investors – or by tourists.
The seventeen authors of this book are from a variety of disciplines and fields of expertise. Through research-driven and profession based knowledge on different aspects of tourism planning in Finland and elsewhere, they offer transformative perspectives and practical applications for responsible tourism planners, investors and political decision-makers to utilise.
Through the book's overarching themes – learnings from the history of tourism planning, wellbeing, participation, building and architecture, people and infrastructure – it addresses a general audience, professional communities, and academic communities. The book's urgent quest is to prevent tourism from remaining one of the causes for the greatest problem of all time, the worsening baseline of living conditions on Earth.

The nineteenth century has been called an age of monuments. In some places even one piece made a difference. This book is a study of the intellectual background and physical making of Finland's first public sculpture, the statue of Professor Henrik Gabriel Porthan by Carl Eneas Sjöstrand. The idealised but sombre Porthan was born under the influence of German neoclassicism. Development on the project was slow but sure. The Swedish artist had to be supported over three years while he was putting together his first monumental piece in Munich and Rome, after which came another three years wait before the cast arrived to Finland. The bronze sculpture, commissioned by the Finnish Literary Society and raised by public subscriptions from people of all classes, was unveiled in the city of Turku in September 1864. Finns took some pride in the fact that, unlike other nations that had raised monuments to kings and generals, here the first place was given to a scholar. In this study Sjöstrand's pioneering bronze is placed in a wider context and compared with works by his precursors and contemporaries in the international sculptor colony of Rome.

This volume looks at the Finnish-German military alliance (1941–1944) as a translation zone – a multilingual network of military, administrative and civilian encounters that was held together by linguistically versed soldiers and civilians acting as interpreters and translators. It focuses on interpreters and liaison officers of the Finnish Liaison Staff in Rovaniemi, who were assigned to the staffs of the German army units with the task of maintaining communication between the two armies and assisting German troops in their daily matters. Furthermore, attention is paid to Finnish civilians, especially women whose language skills made them candidates for a range of mediation tasks in the German units. The reconstruction of military interpreters' and liaison officers' tasks and mediation agency between the two military cultures is based on their war-time weekly reports, whereas the civilian interpreters' experiences are drawn from a variety of autobiographical accounts, including interviews.

Finland was an autonomous Grand Duchy in the Russian Empire during the years 1808–1917. At this time nationalism as well as other ideologies reached Finland from Europe, which strengthened the willingness to change both in society and on a governmental level. The Fennoman movement, which was a movement focusing both on language and on nationalism, became the core of the Finnish self-perception. The goal was to define Finland as a coherent and separate country in relation to its neighbouring countries. Collecting folk poems and learning to know one's home country became essential. People saw the Kalevala poems as a way to understand and define the Finnish identity and the history of the Finnish people. Especially young people with a background in academia were intrigued by these ideas. University students collected poems all over the Grand Duchy of Finland as well as in the Russian part of Carelia, in Sweden, Norway and in Ingria. Students who collected these folk poems also wrote travelogues about their travels and all this material was handed over to The Finnish Literature Society. These documents are unique and there has not been much research done on them, especially with the focus on how the young academic generation during the age of autonomy defined their home country, their national self-perception, themselves and the commoners living in the rural parts of the country. This book reviews travelogues written by one hundred university students who travelled in the country collecting folk poems during 1836–1917. The book offers insight into how the students described Finland and what it meant to be Finnish. Travelogues can be defined as a sort of hybrid of texts. They consist of a mixture of letters, journals, biographical texts and travel books. Consequently, the image that the students depict of Finland is in this study based upon research perspectives and methods used in textual research, oral history and travel literature. The travelogues written by students previously evoked the interest of researchers who mainly studied certain traits of poem collectors, tradition bearers or poems. However, the travelogues contain plenty of information about the lives of the people who lived in the areas where the poems were collected. The descriptions of Finland in the travelogues do not represent the "real" 19th century Finland, but instead it is a story written and created by university students. The characteristics that are presented in The Land of Hope are based on how the intelligentsia perceived "real" Finnishness as opposed to the uneducated commoners living in the rural parts of the country. The most notable themes in the travelogues are the state and the future of the society and of being Finnish. Another theme is the otherization of those who were uneducated commoners. These themes describe the fears and hopes that university students had about Finland. They also show us that the travelogues were ideological texts about Finland and Finnishness that united the collectors of folk poetry. This book studies the collection of folk poetry in the context of the ideologies during the age of autonomy and it explains what the collection of poems meant and who were involved in it. Furthermore, the book gives an insight into the possibilities to pursue academic studies and it also presents the most essential sources of students' knowledge about Finland at that point of time.

Alex Matson (1888–1972) is an important Finnish literary critic and essayist, whose literary reviews and collections of essays have made a vital contribution to the development of Finland's postwar literary generation. Born in Finland as the son of a sailor, Matson moved as a young child with his family to Hull in England, where he went to school. In the 1910s, he moved back to Finland, where he at first established himself as painter associated with the expressionist November Group, an important Finnish artistic movement at the time. In the interbellum, he moved from fine arts to literature. In the 1920s and 1930s, he published several novels, but more important was his work as transmitter of international literary ideas to Finland. Together with his first wife, Kersti Bergroth, he edited the literary journal Sininen kirja (""The Blue Book""; 1927–1930), which was inspired by the writings of John Middleton Murry and Katherine Mansfield. Sininen kirja is the most international literary journal in Finnish history to date and introduced Finland to the most significant modernist writers of the first half of the 20th century (Gottfried Benn, Jean Cocteau, Alfred Döblin, T. S. Eliot, Aldous Huxley, James Joyce, D. H. Lawrence, Katherine Mansfield, Paul Valéry, Virginia Woolf).
During the Second World War, Matson worked for the State Communications Agency, which was responsible for disseminating relevant information about Finland to other nations and for informing Finns of relevant developments abroad. It was also tasked with studying the prevailing mood among the population in Finland. In Matson's unpublished wartime diaries, one can see the first symptoms of a shift in Finnish culture away from Germany and towards Anglo-Saxon culture.
From the 1940s onwards, Matson recommended new English and American novels as a part of his work as reader for Finnish publishing houses, and he also translated works by Joyce, Hemingway and Steinbeck. With the help of a network of international literary critics, Matson became acquainted with New Criticism, which he introduced to Finland before it became established among academic researchers. He was often critical of academic literary studies, but his seminal essay works Romaanitaide (""On the Prose Novel""; 1947), John Steinbeck (1948), Kaksi mestaria (""Two Masters"", on Tolstoy and Dostoevsky; 1950) as well as his impressive conversational skills were instrumental in introducing knowledge about the principles of the prose novel to several authors (including Väinö Linna, Lauri Viita, and Hannu Salama), and contributed to their views of literature. Matson emphasized the importance of reading and understanding high-quality literature for the wellbeing of society.

The Centre Party of Finland was represented in almost all cabinets for decades, and it often held the post of prime minister during the reign of President Urho Kekkonen. When Kekkonen's deteriorating health forced him to resign in 1981, the Centre Party, formerly the Agrarian Union, was in front of the crisis. The party was deeply divided along the lines of who would be the best candidate to succeed Kekkonen. The schism had prevailed for years, and contemporaries suspected the party would split up or at least lose its dominant position in Finnish politics. Besides, the numbers of core supporters making up the party, agrarians, were constantly diminishing. In addition, the Finnish party system was in a state of flux. The Finnish People's Democratic League was in a deep downward spiral, while the Conservative Party's support was ascendant. The power struggle between the three 'big' parties, the Centre Party, the Social Democratic Party and the Conservative Party, was fierce. The study describes and analyses how the Center Party survived the challenges it faced. How was the cohesion of the party rebuilt and maintained? How did the Centre Party manage to survive the inter-party contests and end up being the strongest party in the elections of 1991? The study is firmly based on source material from the party organization of the Centre Party and other relevant political actors, such as President Mauno Koivisto. The book provides new information on both Finnish domestic and foreign politics and the power struggles among the parties and leading political figures.

In recent decades, the focus of Folklore Studies has shifted from analysing the products of oral traditions as texts to examining the ways in which people use and produce these items, and the areas of study have broadened to include vernacular cultures and genres in diverse verbal and material forms. As evident from the introduction and twelve chapters of this collection, these interests are today shared by several disciplines that cooperate in the area of cultural studies. This book provides insights into current questions about the "nature" of words: it discusses both the inherent essence of vernacular expression and how that essence is tied to various genre-ecological, performative, and material environments. The chapters include studies on the poetics, form, function, performance, and composition of traditional and new vernacular forms, including explorations of hybridity, materiality, and change, as well as critical examinations of archival practices and publication processes.