Search results

Borderlands are like a magnifying glass on some of the world's most entrenched security challenges. In unstable regions, border areas attract violent non-state groups, ranging from rebels and paramilitaries to criminal organizations, who exploit central government neglect. These groups compete for territorial control, cooperate in illicit cross-border activities, and provide a substitute for the governance functions usually associated with the state. Drawing on extensive fieldwork with more than 600 interviews in and on the shared borderlands of Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela - where conflict is rife and crime thriving - this text provides exclusive firsthand insights into these war-torn spaces. It reveals how dynamic interactions among violent non-state groups produce a complex security landscape with ramifications for order and governance both locally and beyond.

Borderlands are like a magnifying glass on some of the world's most entrenched security challenges. In unstable regions, border areas attract violent non-state groups, ranging from rebels and paramilitaries to criminal organizations, who exploit central government neglect. These groups compete for territorial control, cooperate in illicit cross-border activities, and provide a substitute for the governance functions usually associated with the state. Drawing on extensive fieldwork with more than 600 interviews in and on the shared borderlands of Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela - where conflict is rife and crime thriving - this text provides exclusive firsthand insights into these war-torn spaces. It reveals how dynamic interactions among violent non-state groups produce a complex security landscape with ramifications for order and governance both locally and beyond.

How can we understand change in armed conflict, both in terms of the phenomenon as a whole, as well as within individual conflicts? This Special Issue sets a new agenda on the theme of change in armed conflict. Studying conflict as a dynamic social phenomenon requires embracing interdisciplinarity and methodological pluralism, which this Special Issue facilitates through a shared conceptual framework on five dimensions of change as a 'lingua franca' across diverse approaches and perspectives. It advances debates through three contributions: by critically assessing pre-existing categories and labels; by accounting for perceptions and experiences; and by scaling analyses across varying units and levels of analysis.

In contemporary armed conflict, the spatiality of violence and the constellation of actors involved in it change frequently, but how these changes affect one another remains poorly understood. What explains the spatial shift of areas affected by violence in multi-actor conflicts? We argue that the emergence of a new dominant conflict actor facilitates a shift in conflict-related violence. We theorize the causal mechanism as 'low-risk/high-opportunity attraction'. It exists in territories where these actors can draw on a local support base and enhance capacities to engage in violence. To demonstrate our theory's validity, we conduct two plausibility probes: on the conflict in Colombia paired with the conflict in the Lake Chad region, and on the conflict in the Afghan–Pakistani borderlands paired with the conflict in Iraq/Syria. We adopt a mixed-methods approach integrating visualizations, spatial analysis, network analysis and process tracing, drawing, inter alia, on interviews from remote regions of war-torn Colombia and Iraq.

Introduction:Fifty years of the War on Drugs: a moment of uncertainty /Annette Idler and Juan Carlos Garzón Vergara --Warriors, victims, and vulnerable regions: a critical perspective on the War on Drugs /Annette Idler --Part one. The changing character of the War on Drugs:Building the global drug regime: origins and impact, 1909-1990s /Paul Gootenberg --The international drug control regime: crisis and fragmentation /Christopher Hallam and David Bewley-Taylor --A forward march halted: the UNGASS process and the War on Drugs /Mónica Serrano --Part two. Between warriors and victims: the War on Drugs across vulnerable regions:South America: from acquiescence to rebellion? /Angélica Durán-Martínez --Mexico and Central America: flexibility and frameworks /Carlos A. Pérez Ricart --West Africa: securitized drugs as an existential threat? /John M. Pokoo and Kwesi Aning --The Crescent Three states: which way to go? /Philip Robins --The golden triangle: regression then reform? /Pierre-Arnaud Chouvy --Russia: beyond the global South-North framework /Ekaterina Stepanova --Part three. Between securitization and people-centered policies: a glocal perspective on the War on Drugs:Drug use and crime in the context of the War on Drugs /Nicolas Trajtenberg, Olga Sánchez de Ribera and Clara Musto --Health and human rights challenges for the international drug control regime /Damon Barrett and Kasia Malinowska-Sempruch --The 2030 sustainable development agenda and the War on Drugs /Javier Sagredo --Rethinking drug policy metrics to move beyond the War on Drugs /Robert Muggah and Katherine Aguirre --Transforming the War on Drugs: a pathway to change the current paradigm /Annette Idler and Juan Carlos Garzón Vergara.

The war on drugs has failed, but consensus in the international drug policy debate on the way forward is missing. Challenging conventional thinking in defence and security sectors, this book constitutes a comprehensive and systematic effort to theoretically, conceptually, and empirically investigate the impacts of the war on drugs.

This article is part of a multi-year study of governance structures in the midst of insecurity and organized crime in fragile sub-state regions, where in the absence of a strong state, non-state actors (like insurgents, traffickers and tribal warlords) engage in political and socioeconomic governance. Building on our prior work on West Africa and the Afghanistan-Pakistan tribal belt, this paper focuses on the Andean borderlands, drawing on recent fieldwork in Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela. We explore patterns of behavior in which competition among violent non-state actors is not the norm. Instead, several instances were found in which violent non-state actors work collaboratively or have tacit non-interference agreements to provide public goods through arrangements we characterize as "complementary governance." We therefore argue that, to understand how illicit authority emerges, it is not sufficient to consider one armed non-state actor in isolation or in a dichotomy to the state. As we contend, we have to take into account the complex connections and interactions among different (violent) non-state structures. Moving beyond state versus non-state governance to governance that is constitutive of various non-state groups, the perspective put forward in this article thus is aimed to enrich the current debate on governance and security.