Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
94 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2022/37
SSRN
In: Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, Mar 2021, pp 231-243
SSRN
In: International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2013
SSRN
In: Global constitutionalism: human rights, democracy and the rule of law, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 53-90
ISSN: 2045-3825
AbstractThe European Convention on Human Rights is rapidly evolving into a cosmopolitan legal order: a transnational legal system in which all public officials bear the obligation to fulfill the fundamental rights of every person within their jurisdiction. The emergence of the system depended on certain deep, structural transformations of law and politics in Europe, including the consolidation of a zone of peace and economic interdependence, of constitutional pluralism at the national level, and of rights cosmopolitanism at the transnational level. Framed by Kantian ideas, the paper develops a theoretical account of a cosmopolitan legal system, provides an overview of how the ECHR system operates, and establishes criteria for its normative assessment.
In: Journal of European Public Policy, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 92-108
SSRN
In: Journal of Global Constitutionalism, 1 (1) (2012): 53-90.
SSRN
In: OXFORD HANDBOOK OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, Oxford University Press, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
In: Law & ethics of human rights, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 48-76
ISSN: 1938-2545
The arbitral world is at a crucial point in its historical development, poised between two conflicting conceptions of its nature, purpose, and political legitimacy. Formally, the arbitrator is an agent of the contracting parties in dispute, a creature of a discrete contract gone wrong. Yet, increasingly, arbitrators are treated as agents of a larger global community, and arbitration houses concern themselves with the general and prospective impact of important awards. In this paper, I address these questions, first, from the standpoint of delegation theory. In Part I, I introduce the basic "Principal-Agent" framework [P-A] used by social scientists to explain why actors create new institutions, and then briefly discuss how P-A has been applied to the study of courts. Part II uses delegation theory to frame discussion of arbitration as a mode of governance for transnational business and investment. In Part III, I argue that the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) is presently in the throes of judicialization, indicators of which include the enhanced use of precedent-based argumentation and justification, the acceptance of third-party briefs, and a flirtation with proportionality balancing. Part IV focuses on the first wave of awards rendered by ICSID tribunals pursuant to Argentina's response to the crushing economic crisis of 2000-02, wherein proportionality emerged, adapted from the jurisprudence of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization.
In: Revue Trimestrielle des Droits de l'Homme, Band 80, S. 923-944
SSRN
In: Journal of European Public Policy, Band 13, S. 627-46
SSRN
In: Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Band 16, S. 621-45
SSRN
In: Living Reviews in EU Governance, 2010
SSRN
Working paper