Open Access BASE2019

LAND RESOURCE INVENTORY AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS OF FARM HOUSEHOLDS FOR WATERSHED PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT KYASPANAHALLI (4D5B2L2c) MICROWATERSHED Yadgir Taluk and District, Karnataka ; Not Available

Abstract

Not Available ; The land resource inventory of Kyaspanahalli Microwatershed was conducted using village cadastral maps and IRS satellite imagery on 1:7920 scale. The false colour composites of IRS imagery were interpreted for physiography and the physiographic delineations were used as base for mapping soils. The soils were studied in several transects and a soil map was prepared with phases of soil series as mapping units. Random checks were made all over the area outside the transects to confirm and validate the soil map unit boundaries. The soil map shows the geographic distribution and extent, characteristics, classification, behavior and use potentials of the soils in the microwatershed. The present study covers an area of 473 ha in Yadgir taluk & district, Karnataka. The climate is semiarid and categorized as drought-prone with an average annual rainfall of 866 mm, of which about 652 mm is received during south-west monsoon, 138 mm during north-east and the remaining 76 mm during the rest of the year. An area of 427 ha in the microwatershed is covered by soils, 2 ha by railway line and about 44 ha by others (habitation and water bodies). The salient findings from the land resource inventory are summarized briefly below.  The soils belong to 10 soil series and 15 soil phases (management units) and 5 land management units.  The length of crop growing period is about 120-150 days starting from 1st week of June to 4th week of October.  From the master soil map, several interpretative and thematic maps like land capability, soil depth, surface soil texture, soil gravelliness, available water capacity, soil slope and soil erosion were generated.  Soil fertility status maps for macro and micronutrients were generated based on the surface soil samples collected at every 320 m grid interval.  Land suitability for growing 29 major agricultural and horticultural crops was assessed and maps showing the degree of suitability along with constraints were generated.  Entire area in the microwatershed is suitable for agriculture.  About 44 per cent area of the microwatershed has soils that are moderately deep to very deep (75 - >150 cm) and 46 per cent soils are very shallow to moderately shallow (200 mm/m) in available water capacity, 14 per cent medium (101-150 mm/m), 10 per cent area low (51-100 mm/m) and 37 per cent area very low (0.75%), 80 per cent is medium (0.50-0.75%) and 5 per cent is low ( 57 kg/ha) in available phosphorus.  An area 26 per cent is low (337 kg/ha) in available potassium in the microwatershed.  Available sulphur is low (20 ppm) in 1 per cent of the microwatershed.  Available boron is low (4.5 ppm) in an area of 53 per cent and deficient (0.6 ppm) in 1 per cent area of the microwatershed.  The land suitability for 29 major crops grown in the microwatershed were assessed and the areas that are highly suitable (S1) and moderately suitable (S2) are given below. It is however to be noted that a given soil may be suitable for various crops but what specific crop to be grown may be decided by the farmer looking to his capacity to invest on various inputs, marketing infrastructure, market price and finally the demand and supply position. Land suitability for various crops in the Microwatershed Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Crop Suitability Area in ha (%) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Highly suitable (S1) Moderately suitable (S2) Sorghum 1(<1) 144(30) Guava - 1(<1) Maize 1(<1) 144(30) Sapota - 1(<1) Bajra 1(<1) 144(30) Pomegranate - 1(<1) Groundnut - 46(10) Musambi - 1(<1) Sunflower - 1(<1) Lime - 1(<1) Redgram - 100(21) Amla 1(<1) 45(9) Bengal gram - - Cashew - 1(<1) Cotton - 1(<1) Jackfruit - 1(<1) Chilli 1(<1) 45(9) Jamun - - Tomato 1(<1) 45(9) Custard apple 1(<1) 45(9) Brinjal 1(<1) 45(9) Tamarind - - Onion 1(<1) 45(9) Mulberry - 1(<1) Bhendi 1(<1) 45(9) Marigold 1(<1) 45(9) Drumstick - 1(<1) Chrysanthemum 1(<1) 45(9) Mango - -  Apart from the individual crop suitability, a proposed crop plan has been prepared for the identified LMUs by considering only the highly and moderately suitable lands for different crops and cropping systems with food, fodder, fibre and horticulture crops.  Maintaining soil-health is vital for crop production and conserve soil and land resource base for maintaining ecological balance and to mitigate climate change. For this, several ameliorative measures have been suggested to these problematic soils like saline/alkali, highly eroded, sandy soils etc.,  Soil and water conservation treatment plan has been prepared that would help in identifying the sites to be treated and also the type of structures required.  As part of the greening programme, several tree species have been suggested to be planted in marginal and sub marginal lands, field bunds and also in the hillocks, mounds and ridges. This would help in not only supplementing the farm income but also provide fodder and fuel and generate lot of biomass which would help in maintaining an ecological balance and also contribute to mitigating the climate change. SALIENT FINDINGS OF THE SURVEY  The data indicated that there were 111 (63.43%) men and 64 (36.57%) women among the sampled households.  The average family size of landless farmers' was 3.8, marginal farmers' was 4.86, small farmers' was 5.09, semi medium farmers' was 5.90 and medium farmers' was 3.50.  The data indicated that, 31 (17.71%) people were in 0-15 years of age, 83 (47.43%) were in 16-35 years of age, 55 (31.43%) were in 36-60 years of age and 6 (3.43%) were above 61 years of age.  The results indicated that Kyaspanahalli had 57.14 per cent illiterates, 0.57 per cent functional literate, 13.71 per cent of them had primary school education, 2.29 per cent of them had middle school education, 10.86 per cent of them had high school education, 6.86 per cent of them had PUC education, 2.29 per cent of them did ITI and 3.43 per cent of them had degree education.  The results indicate that, 74.29 per cent of households were practicing agriculture, 22.86 per cent of the households were agricultural labourers and 2.86 per cent of them were general labour.  The results indicate that agriculture was the major occupation for 48.57 per cent of the household members, 9.71 per cent were agricultural laborers, 2.29 per cent were general labourers, 1.71 per cent were in private service, 26.86 per cent were students, 8 per cent were housewives and 2.86 per cent were children.  The results show that 100 per cent of the population in the micro watershed has not participated in any local institutions.  The results indicate that 22.86 per cent of the households possess thatched house, 51.43 per cent of the households possess Katcha house and 34.29 per cent of them possess pucca house.  The results show that 77.14 per cent of the households possess TV, 31.43 per cent of the households possess Mixer grinder, 2.86 per cent of the households possess refrigerator, 34.29 per cent of the households possess motor cycle, 5.71 per cent of the households possess auto and 97.14 per cent of the households possess mobile phones.  The results show that the average value of television was Rs.9000, mixer grinder was Rs.2000, refrigerator was Rs.8000, motor cycle was Rs.47333, auto was Rs.85000 and mobile phone was Rs.2259.  About 11.43 per cent of the households possess plough, 2.86 per cent of them possess sprayer and 60 per cent of them possess weeder.  The results show that the average value of plough was Rs.1500, the average value of sprayer was Rs.1000 and the average value of weeder was Rs.50.  The results indicate that, 28.57 per cent of the households possess bullocks and 17.14 per cent of the households possess local cow. 2  The results indicate that, average own labour men available in the micro watershed was 2.26, average own labour (women) available was 1.42, average hired labour (men) available was 11.35 and average hired labour (women) available was 10.35.  The results indicate that, 88.57 per cent of the households opined that the hired labour was adequate.  The results indicate that, households of the Kyaspanahalli micro-watershed possess 16.55 ha (44.48%) of dry land and 20.66 ha (55.52%) of irrigated land. Marginal farmers possess 2.66 ha (97.05%) of dry land and 0.08 ha (2.95%) of irrigated land. Small farmers possess 11.87 ha (81.74%) of dry land and 2.65 ha (18.26%) of irrigated land. Semi medium farmers possess 2.02 ha (12.81%) of dry land and 13.77 ha (87.19%) of irrigated land. Medium farmers possess 4.16 ha (100%) of irrigated land.  The results indicate that, the average value of dry land was Rs. 428,777.50 and average value of irrigated land was Rs. 566,092.06. In case of marginal famers, the average land value was Rs. 1,015,068.49 for dry land and Rs. 6,174,999.91. In case of small famers, the average land value was Rs. 328,435.05 for dry land and the average land value was Rs. 867,328.25. In case of semi medium famers, the average land value was Rs. 247,000 for dry land and Rs. 493,709.58 for irrigated land. In case of medium farmers it was Rs. 504,571.97 for irrigated land.  The results indicate that, there were 15 functioning bore wells in the micro watershed.  The results indicate that, bore well was the major irrigation source in the micro water shed for 42.86 per cent of the farmers.  The results indicate that, the depth of bore well was found to be 42.24 meters.  The results indicate that, marginal, small, semi medium and medium farmers had an irrigated area of 0.08 ha, 2.65 ha, 13.77 ha and 4.16 ha.  The results indicate that, farmers have grown cotton (12.9 ha), green gram (10.95 ha), red gram (7.86 ha), groundnut (4.16 ha) and paddy (1.36 ha). Marginal farmers have grown cotton, green gram, red gram and paddy. Small farmers have grown cotton, green gram and red gram. Semi medium farmers have grown cotton Green gram, red gram and paddy. Medium farmers have grown groundnut.  The results indicate that, the cropping intensity in Kyaspanahalli micro-watershed was found to be 100 per cent.  The results indicate that, 2.86 per cent of the households have bank account in the micro watershed.  The results indicate that, 2.86 per cent of the households have availed credit from different sources.  The results indicate that, 100 per cent of the households availed loan from grameena bank.  The results indicate that, average credit availed in the micro watershed was Rs. 80000. 3  The results indicate that, 100 per cent of the households have borrowed loan from institutional sources for the purpose of agricultural production.  The results indicated that 100 per cent of the households did not repay their loan borrowed from institutional sources.  The results indicate that, around 100 per cent opined that the rate of interest was higher in institutional sources of credit.  The results indicate that, the total cost of cultivation for cotton was Rs. 45812.75. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 118585.38. The net income from Cotton cultivation was Rs. 72772.63, thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:2.59.  The total cost of cultivation for red gram was Rs. 43878.16. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 182303.81. The net income from red gram cultivation was Rs. 138425.64. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:4.15.  The total cost of cultivation for green gram was Rs. 22740.66. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 63118.12. The net income from green gram cultivation was Rs. 40377.46. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:2.78.  The total cost of cultivation for Groundnut was Rs. 35032.01. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 64000.66. The net income from Groundnut cultivation was Rs. 28968.65. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.83.  The total cost of cultivation for paddy was Rs. 395605.32. The gross income realized by the farmers was Rs. 515104.42. The net income from paddy cultivation was Rs. 119499.10. Thus the benefit cost ratio was found to be 1:1.3.  The results indicate that, 28.57 per cent of the households opined that dry fodder was adequate and 28.57 per cent of the households opined that green fodder was adequate.  The results indicate that the annual gross income was Rs. 48,000 for landless farmers, for marginal farmers it was Rs. 118,428.57, for small farmers it was Rs. 152,487.36, for semi medium farmers it was Rs. 210,160 and for medium farmers it was Rs. 252,500.  The results indicate that the average annual expenditure is Rs. 15,496.49. For landless households it was Rs. 6,400, for marginal farmers it was Rs. 11,387.76, for small farmers it was Rs. 11,620.87, for semi medium farmers it was Rs. 13,983.33 and for medium farmers it was Rs. 81,500.  The results indicate that, sampled households have grown 2 coconut trees, 2 lemon trees and 11 mango trees in their fields.  The results indicate that, households have planted 1 teak, 42 neem and 1 banyan tree in their field.  The results indicated that, cotton was sold to the extent of 100 per cent, Greengram to the extent of 84.1 per cent, groundnut to the extent of 66.7 per cent, paddy to the extent of 57.6 per cent and redgram to the extent of 69.6 per cent.  The results indicated that, about 85.71 per cent of the farmers sold their produce to local/village merchants. 4  The results indicated that, 85.71 per cent of the households have used tractor as a mode of transportation for their agricultural produce.  The results indicated that, 60 per cent of the households have experienced soil and water erosion problems in the farm i.e., 85.71 per cent of the marginal farmers, 45.45 per cent of small farmers, 80 per cent of semi medium farmers and 100 per cent of medium farmers have experienced soil and water erosion problems.  The results indicated that, 77.14 per cent have shown interest in soil test which accounts for 100 per cent of marginal farmers, 81.82 per cent of small farmers, 100 per cent of semi medium farmers and 50 per cent of medium farmers.  The results indicated that, 80 per cent of the households used firewood and 20 per cent used LPG as a source of fuel.  The results indicated that, piped supply was the major source of drinking water for 88.57 per cent of the households and bore well was the source of drinking water for 11.43 per cent of the households in the micro watershed.  Electricity was the major source of light for 100 per cent of the households in micro watershed.  The results indicated that, 54.29 per cent of the households possess sanitary toilet.  The results indicated that, 94.29 per cent of the sampled households possessed BPL card and 5.71 per cent of the households possessed APL card.  The results indicated that, 88.57 per cent of the households participated in NREGA programme.  The results indicated that, cereals were adequate for 100 per cent of the households, pulses were adequate for 100 per cent, oilseeds were adequate for 2.86 per cent, vegetables were adequate for 22.86 per cent, fruits were adequate for 20 per cent, milk was adequate for 100 per cent, eggs were adequate for 94.29 per cent and meat was adequate for 54.29 per cent.  The results indicated that, oilseeds were inadequate for 97.14 per cent, vegetables were inadequate for 77.14 per cent, fruits were inadequate for 80 per cent and meat was inadequate for 40 per cent of the households.  The results indicated that, lower fertility status of the soil was the constraint experienced by 85.71 per cent of the households, wild animal menace on farm field (85.71%), frequent incidence of pest and diseases (85.71%), inadequacy of irrigation water (85.71%), high cost of fertilizers and plant protection chemicals (82.86%), low price for the agricultural commodities (85.71%) and lack of marketing facilities in the area (20%). ; Watershed Development Department, Government of Karnataka (World Bank Funded) Sujala –III Project

Sprachen

Englisch

Verlag

ICAR::National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Bengaluru & Watershed Development Department, Government of Karnataka (Sujala-III Project)

Problem melden

Wenn Sie Probleme mit dem Zugriff auf einen gefundenen Titel haben, können Sie sich über dieses Formular gern an uns wenden. Schreiben Sie uns hierüber auch gern, wenn Ihnen Fehler in der Titelanzeige aufgefallen sind.