Evolutions, dispersions et déterminants du revenu en élevage bovin allaitant charolais. Etude sur 15 ans (1989-2003) à partir d'un échantillon constant de 69 exploitations

In: Productions Animales 4 (18), 265-275. (2005)

Abstract

Malgré une forte restructuration et les réformes successives de la politique agricole commune, le revenu des exploitations professionnelles spécialisées en bovins viande est, en moyenne, toujours l'un des plus faibles de l'ensemble des exploitations françaises. Le suivi d'un groupe constant de 69 exploitations d'élevage bovin allaitant charolais du nord Massif Central sur 15 ans (de 1989 à 2003) montre une forte progression de la taille de ces exploitations et du cheptel à main-d'oeuvre constante. Cette augmentation de la productivité du travail, réponse à la baisse constante du prix de la viande seulement en partie compensée par des aides, s'est accompagnée d'une évolution des systèmes de production (régression de l'engraissement des mâles et raccourcissement des cycles de production). La variabilité de ; Despite the successive reforms of the common agricultural policy and a strong reorganisation, the farm income of the professional suckler cattle farms remains, on average, always one of the lowest of all French farms. The monitoring of a constant group of 69 suckler cattle Charolais farms from the north Massif Central over 15 years (from 1989 to 2003) showed a high increase of the farm area and herd size with a constant workforce. This increase in the labour productivity, a response to the constant drop in the meat sale price only partly compensated by subsidies, was accompanied by an evolution of the farming systems (a decrease in the rate of fattened males and shortening of the production cycles). The variability of our sample is expressed by the size (area and herd), also by the specialisation rate (livestock or mixed crop-livestock farming) and by the choice of the production system (animals fattened or not). Overall, the average farm income per worker remained stable, with an increased dependence of the latter facing the subsidies. The average of the incomes is almost the same whatever the production system, but the scatter of the intra-system incomes is relatively significant. The income per worker always remains correlated with size criteria (herd and/or area) but with the following distinction: before the first CAP reform, the size of the livestock was important because of the outputs that it generated; after 1992, the size has an effect on the farm income by the subsidies that it makes it possible to perceive.