Неопостмодерный топос мысли А. Бадью ; Неопостмодерний топос думки А. Бадью ; Topos of neopostmodern thought of A. Badiou's

Abstract

Исследовано предметное поле (топос) неософистической конструкции философии А. Бадью. ; Досліджено предметне поле (топос) неософістичноїконструкції філософії А. Бадью. ; A. Badiou's occurrence became the philosophical certificate,that the epoch of the postmodern culture, announced occurrenceof a new sophism and got philosophy in deadlocks ща relativity,comes to an end.If the project of philosophy, which begins with E. Gusserl'sphenomenology, is possible to name philosophy of consciousness,it is possible to name A. Badiou's doctrine as philosophy ofthought, more precisely, the theory, which explains breaking ofa quiet course of a current of thought.The modern deconstruction is connected with radical changeof a traditional discourse. But as the deconstruction is a workof thought over text (letter) also A. Badiou's conclusion isn'tconsolatory: deconstructional thought has destructive influenceto any project of philosophy and culture.However the philosophy exists only there where trues reveal;but in itself she doesn't create them. A. Badiou's thought becomesclear: the partitioning of philosophy, generated in classicalculture, into ethics, an aesthetics, psychology, epistemology anda political science is illicit.In work «The Manifest of philosophy» A. Badiou comesto a conclusion that is available only four living conditions ofphilosophy, and defect in one of them leads to its dispersion(disappearance), in the same way as their cumulative occurrencecauses its occurrence.The deconstruction has found out methodological conditionsof «a decline (destruction) of philosophy», as all seams orintrinsic beginnings of philosophy were found out.In a sense the philosophy, adhered simultaneously to fourseams (mathematical, scientific, political and love), it agreeA. Badiou 's representations, starts to be formed, but on theother hand if attentively to examine «topos» of philosophy of thefrench thinker, it is possible to understand that the philosophy,actually, isn't independent area of thinking, – It is always sewnto one or several seams. In such aspect absolutely not clearly,whether it is possible on the basis of A. Badiou 's neosophisticalinstallations to rescue philosophy from «decline».If process «manufactures of trues» consider as patrimonialprocedures, in such context the philosophy isn't sewn toknowledge areas, it is sewn to archetypical and historicallyforms of being of human thought. In this case it is importantto understand, that the basic of theory isn't in trues whichA. Badiou tries to reanimate, basic of theory is patrimonialexperts which create effect of influence collective unconsciouson thought and initiate its (thoughts) special topos. In that casethe philosophy has prospects, as the thought is in sphere of beingof «the patrimonial beginnings».If it is radiate from disciplinary requirements of formation oftrue, in this case the philosophy can appear before next discoursepractice of formation of plurality: if preconditions is morethan four, this way leads to numerous sewings of philosophyto disciplinary practices. But in that case it will not be possibleto avoid a sophism. It is a way to uncertainty which A. Badiouwanted to avoid. It differs nothing from other preconditions ofa modern sophism. The philosophy, deprived of a «patrimonial»history, will be destroyed and will disappear at «ocean» ofknowledge.