Open Access BASE2021

Costs and effects of comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care for older adults with high risk for hospitalisation

Abstract

BackgroundThe healthcare system needs effective strategies to identify the most vulnerable group of older patients, assess their needs and plan their care proactively. To evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of older adults with a high risk of hospitalisation we conducted a prospective, pragmatic, matched-control multicentre trial at 19 primary care practices in Sweden.MethodsWe identified 1604 individuals aged 75years and older using a new, validated algorithm that calculates a risk score for hospitalisation from electronic medical records. After a nine-month run-in period for CGA in the intervention group, 74% of the available 646 participants had accepted and received CGA, and 662 participants remained in the control group. Participants at intervention practices were invited to CGA performed by a nurse together with a physician. The CGA was adapted to the primary care context. The participants thereafter received actions according to individual needs during a two-year follow-up period. Participants at control practices received care as usual. The primary outcome was hospital care days. Secondary outcomes were number of hospital care episodes, number of outpatient visits, health care costs and mortality. Outcomes were analysed according to intention to treat and adjusted for age, gender and risk score. We used generalised linear mixed models to compare the intervention group and control group regarding all outcomes.ResultsMean age was 83.2years, 51% of the 1308 participants were female. Relative risk reduction for hospital care days was -22% (-35% to -4%, p=0.02) during the two-year follow-up. Relative risk reduction for hospital care episodes was -17% (-30% to -2%, p=0.03). There were no significant differences in outpatient visits or mortality.Health care costs were significantly lower in the intervention group, adjusted mean difference was Euro - 4324 (Euro - 7962 to -686, p=0.02).Conclusions and relevanceOur findings indicate that CGA in primary care can reduce the need ...

Sprachen

Englisch

Verlag

Linköpings universitet, Avdelningen för prevention, rehabilitering och nära vård; Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten; Region Östergötland, Vårdcentralen Valla; Linköpings universitet, Avdelningen för samhälle och hälsa; Region Östergötland, Medicinska och geriatriska akutkliniken; BMC

DOI

10.1186/s12877-021-02166-1

Problem melden

Wenn Sie Probleme mit dem Zugriff auf einen gefundenen Titel haben, können Sie sich über dieses Formular gern an uns wenden. Schreiben Sie uns hierüber auch gern, wenn Ihnen Fehler in der Titelanzeige aufgefallen sind.