Open Access BASE2017
The symbolic politics behind why sane people vote for (seemingly) insane things
Abstract
The 2016 election provided ample evidence that voters often support candidates who put forward policies which will be of little benefit or may even be detrimental to them. But why do voters support such policies? Using Texas as a case study, John Kincaid writes that the Republican Party was able to reframe debates over school finance reform by linking concern over the redistribution of resources from wealthier to poorer districts to threats to dominant forms of economic, cultural, and racial privilege from a "politically correct" liberal elite.
Themen
Sprachen
Englisch
Verlag
The London School of Economics and Political Science
Problem melden