Modes of government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from Council negotiation positions

In: Wratil, Christopher orcid:0000-0002-7339-9628 (2018). Modes of government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from Council negotiation positions. Eur. Union Polit., 19 (1). S. 52 - 75. LONDON: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD. ISSN 1741-2757

Abstract

Are national governments responsive to citizens' opinions when negotiating policies in the Council of the European Union? Conceiving of the Council's policy-making space as encompassing left-right and pro-anti integration issues, I argue that governments apply different modes of responsiveness' on these issues. As left-right issues are more reliably and intensely salient in domestic elections than pro-anti integration issues, governments' responsiveness to left-right public opinion should be more systematic than to pro-anti integration opinion. Statistical analyses of 3700 policy positions of governments in the Council demonstrate that governments highly structure their responsiveness on left-right issues according to electoral cycles and systems (systematic mode'). However, they only sporadically respond to public opinion on pro-anti integration issues, when parties and events trigger the public salience of integration (sporadic mode').