Open Access BASE2020

Comparison of forecasting models to predict concrete bridge decks performance

Abstract

The accuracy of forecasting models for the prediction of an infrastructure's deterioration process plays a significant role in the estimation of optimal maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement strategies. Numerous approaches have been developed to overcome the limitations of existing forecasting models. In this article, a direct comparison is made between different models using the same input data to derive conclusions of their distinct performance. The models selected for the comparison were Markov, semi-Markov, and hidden Markov models together with artificial neural networks (ANNs), which have been reported in literature as reliable deterioration prediction models. A quality of fit was performed to measure how well the observed data corresponded to the predicted values, and therefore objectively compare the performance of each model. The results demonstrated that the most accurate prediction was accomplished by the ANN model. Nevertheless, all models presented differences with respect to typical values of concrete decks life expectancy, which is attributed to the inherent difficulties of the database. Additionally, the problem of the visual inspection subjectivity was also regarded as one of the potential causes for the found deviations. Therefore, this article also discusses the shortcomings of current condition assessment practices and encourages future bridge management systems to replace the classical methods by more sophisticated and objective tools. ; The first, third and fourth authors also acknowledge that, this work was partly 574 financed by FEDER funds through the Competitivity Factors Operational 575 Programme - COMPETE and by national funds through FCT Foundation for 576 Science and Technology within the scope of the project POCI-01-0145-FEDER- 577 007633. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 578 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 769255. This 579 document reflects only the views of the author(s). Neither the Innovation and 580 ...

Problem melden

Wenn Sie Probleme mit dem Zugriff auf einen gefundenen Titel haben, können Sie sich über dieses Formular gern an uns wenden. Schreiben Sie uns hierüber auch gern, wenn Ihnen Fehler in der Titelanzeige aufgefallen sind.