Open Access BASE2022

Interchangeability of biosimilars : A study of expert views and visions regarding the science and substitution

Abstract

Healthcare systems have reached a critical point regarding the question of whether biosimilar substitution should become common practice. To move the discussion forward, the study objective was to investigate the views of experts from medicines agencies and the pharmaceutical industry on the science underpinning interchangeability of biosimilars. We conducted an empirical qualitative study using semi-structured interviews informed by a cross-disciplinary approach encompassing regulatory science, law, and pharmaceutical policy. In total 25 individuals with experience within biologics participated during September 2018-August 2019. Eight participants were EU national medicines authority regulators, and 17 had pharmaceutical industry background: five from two originator-only companies, four from two companies with both biosimilar and originator products, and eight from seven biosimilar-only companies. Two analysts independently conducted inductive content analysis, resulting in data-driven themes capturing the meaning of the data. The participants reported that interchangeability was more than a scientific question of likeness between biosimilar and reference products: it also pertained to regulatory practices and trust. Participants were overall confident in the science behind exchanging biosimilar products for the reference products via switching, i.e., with physician involvement. However, their opinions differed regarding the scientific risk associated with biosimilar substitution, i.e., without physician involvement. Almost all participants saw no need for additional scientific data to support substitution. Moreover, the participants did not believe that switching studies, as required in the US, were appropriate for obtaining scientific certainty due to their small size. It is unclear why biosimilar switching is viewed as scientifically safer than substitution; therefore, we expect greater policy debate on biosimilar substitution in the near future. We urge European and UK policymakers and regulators to clarify ...

Sprachen

Englisch

Verlag

Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap; Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för farmaci; Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Copenhagen Ctr Regulatory Sci CORS, Dept Pharm, Copenhagen, Denmark.;Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Pharm, Social & Clin Pharm, Copenhagen, Denmark.;Univ Copenhagen, Fac Law, Ctr Adv Studies Biomed Innovat Law CeBIL, Copenhagen, Denmark.; Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Pharm, Social & Clin Pharm, Copenhagen, Denmark.; Univ Copenhagen, Fac Law, Ctr Adv Studies Biomed Innovat Law CeBIL, Copenhagen, Denmark.; LEO Pharma AS, Ballerup, Denmark.; Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Copenhagen Ctr Regulatory Sci CORS, Dept Pharm, Copenhagen, Denmark.;Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands.; Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Pharm, Drug Delivery & Biophys Biopharmaceut, Copenhagen, Denmark.; Public Library of Science (PLoS)

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0262537

Problem melden

Wenn Sie Probleme mit dem Zugriff auf einen gefundenen Titel haben, können Sie sich über dieses Formular gern an uns wenden. Schreiben Sie uns hierüber auch gern, wenn Ihnen Fehler in der Titelanzeige aufgefallen sind.