Standards for Experimental Research: Encouraging a Better Understanding of Experimental Methods

In: Journal of experimental political science: JEPS, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 192-215

Abstract

AbstractIn this essay, we closely examine three aspects of the Reporting Guidelines for this journal, as described by Gerber et al. (2014,Journal of Experimental Political Science1(1): 81–98) in the inaugural issue of the Journal of Experimental Political Science. These include manipulation checks and when the reporting of response rates is appropriate. The third, most critical, issue concerns the committee's recommendations for detecting errors in randomization. This is an area where there is evidence of widespread confusion about experimental methods throughout our major journals. Given that a goal of the Journal of Experimental Political Science is promoting best practices and a better understanding of experimental methods across the discipline, we recommend changes to the Standards that will allow the journal to play a leading role in correcting these misunderstandings.