Ambiguity, Diversity and an Ethics of Understanding:: What Nishida's Philosophy Can Contribute To the Pluralism Debate

In: Culture and Dialogue, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 21-44

Abstract

The world in the global age is characterized by a diversity of cultures, philosophies, religious traditions, and by a political landscape that increasingly features a multiplicity of powers or at least sides. Thus, an increasing amount of voices suggests the inevitability of multiculturalism, "intercultural philosophy," religious dialogue, and political multilateralism. At the same time, however, the step from the fact of diversity to pluralism, that is the belief that diversity is a value, is frequently questioned. What is missing in this debate on pluralism, however, is a genuine philosophy of diversity, that is, a philosophy that takes into account the fact of diversity without succumbing to either particularism or universalism. This essay will try to examine the metaphysical conditions for diversity in order to suggest a philosophical position that takes seriously the diversity of cultures, traditions, and positions, without denying their individual particularities and idiosyncracies, on the one hand, and yet allows the theorist to envision a philosophy that does justice to the postmodern predicament, on the other.