Distinguishing a minimalist role for grand theorizing

In: International relations: the journal of the David Davies Memorial Institute of International Studies, Band 31, Heft 1, S. 85-89

Abstract

A major theoretical shortcoming in international relations (IR) is the lack of any semblance of a common understanding regarding the role of grand theory. This article argues that explicit theoretical work of this sort is useful, but that a search for a single overarching grand theory to guide inquiry is misguided and that the primary business of IR is to form and evaluate middle-range theories.