Urban Regeneration in China: Institutional Innovation in Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Shanghai
In: China Perspectives Ser.
Cover -- Half Title -- Series Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Table of Contents -- List of figures -- List of tables -- Foreword I -- Foreword II -- Foreword III -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Chapter 1: Introduction: Urban regeneration in China in the modern era -- 1.1 Urban regeneration as a perennial topic -- 1.2 The rise of China's urban regeneration in the new era of transition -- 1.3 Institutions as crucial challenges and opportunities for urban regeneration in China -- 1.4 Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Shanghai: urban regeneration pioneers and institutional innovators -- 1.4.1 Guangzhou -- 1.4.2 Shenzhen -- 1.4.3 Shanghai -- 1.5 Contents and framework of the comparison of urban regeneration institutions in Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Shanghai -- Notes -- Chapter 2: The institutional innovation of urban regeneration from an Asian perspective -- 2.1 Urban regeneration institutions in Hong Kong -- 2.1.1 Urban renewal management framework in Hong Kong -- 2.1.2 Characteristics of urban renewal institutions in Hong Kong -- 2.2 Urban regeneration institutions in Taipei -- 2.2.1 Urban renewal management framework in Taipei -- 2.2.2 Pros and cons of FAR transfer -- 2.2.3 Taipei URS plan -- 2.3 Urban regeneration policies in Tokyo -- 2.3.1 The urban renewal management framework in the Tokyo Metropolitan Region -- 2.3.2 Urban renewal model innovation 3 -- 2.3.3 A mature system of land rezoning and reorganization -- 2.4 Urban regeneration policies in Singapore -- 2.4.1 The urban renewal management framework in Singapore -- 2.4.2 A renewal model under public land ownership -- 2.5 Characteristics of urban regeneration institutions in four Asian cities -- 2.5.1 Comprehensive policies and laws -- 2.5.2 Broad public participation -- 2.5.3 Active public-private partnerships -- 2.5.4 A combination of incentives and enforcement.