A Multiple Values Model of Political Tolerance

In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of Western Political Science Association, Pacific Northwest Political Science Association, Southern California Political Science Association, Northern California Political Science Association, Band 54, Heft 2, S. 379-406

Abstract

While students of political tolerance often view tolerance decisions as a trade-off between opposing values (civil liberties vs other values), there have been few explicit attempts to formulate & test such a multiple-values model. With rare exception, researchers typically examine linkages between tolerance judgments & a single value constellation (civil liberties or general norms of democracy) without examining directly the way people rank competing values. In this way, we use data from a national telephone survey to test a model of how various value trade-off measures (eg, value conflict) influence citizens' initial tolerance decisions, as well as their willingness to stick to that judgment in the face of counter-arguments (ie, the pliability of the initial baseline judgment). We find that while value conflict is often associated with greater political forbearance of disliked groups (eg, the Klan, flag burners), greater conflict also makes individuals more susceptible to counter-arguments. We also find that when people are presented with roughly equal counter-arguments, the tolerant are much more willing to abandon their initial judgment than the intolerant. We conclude with a discussion of the broader implications of our findings for the study of political tolerance & political values. 2 Tables, 1 Figure, 1 Appendix, 42 References. Adapted from the source document.