The Myth of the Multitude

Abstract

Examines tensions between critical, polemical, & messianic threads in Michael Hardt & Antonio Negri's Empire (2000) in light of prior arguments deviating from orthodox historical materialism. Hardt & Negri's move from a deconstructive-critical to an ethnopolitical methodological approach is addressed before considering the place of Gilles Deleuze & Felix Guattari's work in their postmodernism, highlighting the notion of "deterritorialization." Understanding their polemical divergence from critical or deconstructive approaches when such polemic does little to impel or describe the leftist struggle is difficult; ie, their prophecy is problematized when their metaphysics offers no empirical course or conclusion, & this raises questions for the organization of their notion of multitude. Attention turns to comparing their thought to Georges Sorel's anarchist variation on orthodox Leninism; specifically, multitude is likened to his "General Strike," with the Hardt & Negri's idea constituting what Sorel would call a political myth. The value of such a myth for social movements operating in the context of Empire is questioned. J. Zendejas