Domestic Law Enforcement's Use of Sensory-Enhancing Technology in Terrorist Situations

Abstract

Discusses the potential of various sensory-enhancing technologies in terrorist situations & the legal & constitutional questions raised by their use. The utility & efficiency of ambient light magnification, audio amplification, infrared lighting, & radar are compared. The potential for abuse of Fourth Amendment privacy rights, as seen in the 1967 Katz v. US case, & the legal implications of specific applications of these technologies in "classic" (drug interdiction) & "nonclassic" (counterterrorist) situations are assessed. It is shown how courts rely on passive vs penetrative technology distinctions to resolve these issues & how improvements in technology could provide a more accurate audio & visual record of terrorist incidents. These distinctions may influence the development & marketing of future sensory-enhancing technologies. T. Arnold