Suchergebnisse

[On Diogenes, who coined the term 'cosmopolitan'] 'If only more contemporary self-styled cosmopolitans drank water from their hands, ate human flesh, hugged statues and masturbated in public. … Diogenes's "cosmopolitanism" is much more of an anti-political stance than some sort of banal internationalism'.

Cover -- Half Title -- Title -- Copyright -- Contents -- Preface -- 1 Introduction: The End of the Cold War, the Classical Tradition, and International Change -- 2 Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory After 1945 -- 3 Post-Theory: The Eternal Return of Ethics in International Relations -- 4 Feminist Inquiry and International Relations -- 5 Geopolitics and Change -- 6 Complexity, Formal Methods, and Ideology in International Studies -- 7 Realist International Theory and the Study of World Politics -- 8 Domestic Structure and International Change -- 9 Institutions and Change -- 10 Conclusion: Continuity and Innovation in International Relations Theory -- About the Book and Editors -- About the Contributors -- Index

"This is the first book to describe and test a fully systemic theory of international politics. Using statistics and diplomatic history, it traces statesmen's efforts to influence the power and ideas that form the broad contours of the international system within which they interact"--

In this article, we incorporate the study of diasporas into international relations (IR) theory by focusing on diasporas as independent actors who actively influence their homeland (kin-state) foreign policies. We argue that diasporic influences can best be understood by situating them in the 'theoretical space' shared by constructivism and liberalism; two approaches that acknowledge the impact of identity and domestic politics on international behavior. We also maintain that the exploration of diasporic activities can enrich both constructivism and liberalism. First, diasporas' identity-based motivations should be an integral part of the constructivist effort to explain the formation of national identities. Second, diasporic activities and influences in their homelands expand the meaning of the term 'domestic politics' to include not only politics inside the state but also inside the people For the liberal approach, this is a "new fact" in the Lakatosian sense of the word. We theorize that the extent of diasporic influence on homeland foreign policy is determined by three components that make up the 'balance of power' between homelands and diasporas. We then test this theory by delving into the interaction between the newly established state of Armenia and its powerful diaspora, and by comparing this case with examples taken from the relations between Israel and diaspora Jews.

International Relations theory emerged in the 1930's with the triumph of realism over utopianism, a triumph that created a discourse that has been unable to make a substantial contribution to the literature on international distributive justice which has burgeoned since the mid-1970's. The emergence of neorealist and neoliberal International Relations theory in the 1970's and 1980's made little difference; However, this consensus is now crumbling and a new body of International Relations theory, focusing on bounded communities and the ethics of inclusion and exclusion is emerging. This new work is more in tune with the concerns of political theory – although major differences remain.