Suchergebnisse

Migrationsbewegungen haben die 'Religionslandschaften' vieler europäischer Staaten nachhaltig verändert. Das Studienbuch vermittelt systematische und anwendungsorientierte Kenntnisse zum Wechselverhältnis von Religion und Migration aus religionswissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Zur Sprache kommen Analysen zu religiösem Wandel in der Diaspora und Integration im Zeichen religiöser Pluralisierung. Thematische Vertiefungen decken Moscheebaukonflikte, interreligiöse Dialoge, Digitalisierung und Fragen der Religionskompetenz ab. Das Buch richtet sich an Studierende der Religionswissenschaft und angrenzender Fächer (z.B. Ethnologie, Soziologie, Kulturanthropologie) sowie an interessierte Praktiker:innen, etwa im Bereich der Sozialen Arbeit.

Cécile Laborde's Liberalism's Religion proposes liberal principles to address political controversies over religion. One is the public reason requirement that reasons for state policies should be accessible. Another is the civic inclusiveness requirement according to which symbolic religious establishment is wrong when it communicates that religious identity is a component of civic identity. A third is the claim that liberal states have meta-jurisdictional authority to settle the boundary between what counts as religion and what counts as non-religion. The article considers whether Laborde has managed to articulate these three principles in a way that is operationalisable and can serve to provide solutions to practical controversies over religion. It is argued that Laborde's formulations leave important issues open, and some ways of settling these issues are considered. ; Cécile Laborde's Liberalism's Religion proposes liberal principles to address political controversies over religion. One is the public reason requirement that reasons for state policies should be accessible. Another is the civic inclusiveness requirement according to which symbolic religious establishment is wrong when it communicates that religious identity is a component of civic identity. A third is the claim that liberal states have meta-jurisdictional authority to settle the boundary between what counts as religion and what counts as non-religion. The article considers whether Laborde has managed to articulate these three principles in a way that is operationalisable and can serve to provide solutions to practical controversies over religion. It is argued that Laborde's formulations leave important issues open, and some ways of settling these issues are considered.