The Christian Model of Man: Reply to Nowak
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 89-106
ISSN: 2154-123X
1512 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 15, Heft 1, S. 89-106
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 129-153
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 249-280
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 69-84
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 46, Heft 3, S. 547-572
ISSN: 2154-123X
Algorithmic systems and predictive analytics play an increasingly important role in various aspects of modern life. Scholarship on the moral ramifications of such systems is in its early stages, and much of it focuses on bias and harm. This paper argues that in understanding the moral salience of algorithmic systems it is essential to understand the relation between algorithms, autonomy, and agency. We draw on several recent cases in criminal sentencing and K–12 teacher evaluation to outline four key ways in which issues of agency, autonomy, and respect for persons can conflict with algorithmic decision-making. Three of these involve failures to treat individual agents with the respect they deserve. The fourth involves distancing oneself from a morally suspect action by attributing one's decision to take that action to an algorithm, thereby laundering one's agency.
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 75-102
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 223-243
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 1, Heft 4, S. 71-82
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 42, Heft 4, S. 845-870
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 40, Heft 3, S. 499-527
ISSN: 2154-123X
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 48, Heft 3, S. 429-456
ISSN: 2154-123X
Liberal democracies across the world have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic by implementing measures that significantly curtail the rights and liberties of individual citizens. These measures must receive public justification in order to be politically legitimate. By combining analytical political philosophy with ontology in an original way, in this article we argue that liberal democratic governments have so far failed to adequately justify these measures, since they have not systematically targeted the scholarly study of COVID-19 in everyday environments, consequently implementing rules that are epistemically unsound and not publicly justified, at least not fully.
In: Social theory and practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 111-130
ISSN: 2154-123X