Suchergebnisse

"H.A.S.C. number 113-8." ; Shipping list number: 2013-0321-P. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet.

"Serial No. 113-109." ; Shipping list no.: 2014-0177-P. ; Mode of access: Internet.

The Fifty-Third Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors of the Asian Development Bank was held virtually in two stages. The first stage was on 22 May 2020 and the second stage was from 17 to 18 September 2020. Resolution no. 398 adopted by the Board of Governors in 2019 provided that the Fifty-Third Annual Meeting would be from 2 to 5 May 2020 in Incheon Metropolitan City, Republic of Korea. In view of the global health situation arising from the coronavirus disease 2019, the Board of Directors approved that the annual meeting be held virtually in two stages. The first stage in the form of a reduced-scale meeting of the Board of Governors (predominantly through their appointed representatives) on 22 May 2020 to ensure that statutory requirements could be met. The second stage, originally planned in Incheon from 18-21 September, was changed to a shorter online meeting from 17 to 18 September 2020, which covered the remaining Annual Meeting agenda and comprised a series of virtual events, including events participated by Governors. The Government of the Republic of Korea renewed its commitment to hosting an annual meeting by inviting ADB to hold the Fifty-Sixth Annual Meeting in Incheon, Republic of Korea in 2023, which the Board of Governors approved on 18 September 2020 (Resolution no. 407). This Summary of Proceedings of the 2020 Annual Meeting is presented in accordance with the provisions of Section 9 of the Rules of Procedure of the Board of Governors. The Governor for the Republic of Korea, the Honorable Hong Nam-Ki, chaired the Meeting. The Governor for Indonesia, the Honorable Sri Mulyani Indrawati, and the Temporary Alternate Governor for Luxembourg, Mr. Yves Weber, served as Vice-Chairs. The views expressed by ADB members at the Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of ADB.

Reuse of record except for individual research requires license from Congressional Information Service, Inc. ; Discussions held Mar. 3-17, 1975. ; CIS Microfiche Accession Numbers: CIS 75 H781-13 (pt. 1), CIS 75 H781-14 (pt. 2), CIS 75 H781-15 (pt. 3), CIS 75 H781-16 (pt. 4) ; pt. 1. Administration officials presenting details of President's energy proposals. General economic discussion of the effect of Administration and other energy programs. National energy needs and alternative sources.--pt. 2. Tax policy in the energy sector. International financial aspects of the energy problem.--pt. 3. Petroleum supply. Gas and other energy sources. Automobile efficiency and conservation.--pt. 4. Industrial, agriculture, and home energy problems. Transportation. Additional testimony from Government officials. ; Microfiche. ; Mode of access: Internet.

"H.A.S.C. no. 113-55." ; Shipping list no.: 2014-0210-P ; Mode of access: Internet.

У статті проаналізований адресант як автор політичного тексту, названірізні підходи до його визначення та класифікації. Автор зазначає, що адресант як елемент політичної комунікації присутній у політичному повідомленні в вигляді стилю, який можна розглядати в різних площинах, зокрема в площині лаконічності й красномовності, кризи й стабільності, демократичного й недемократичного врядування, комічного чи трагічного тощо. У статті встановлена кореляція між стилем політичного повідомлення та політичним дискурсом, політичними настроями відповідної спільноти загалом. ; В статье проанализирован адресант как автор политического текста,названные различные подходы к его определению и классификации. Автор отмечает, что адресант как элемент политической коммуникации присутствует в политическом сообщении в виде стиля, который можно рассматривать в разных аспектах, в частности лаконичности и красноречия, кризиса и стабильности, демократического и недемократического управления, комического или трагического и тому подобное. В статье установлена корреляция между стилем политического сообщения и политическим дискурсом, политическими настроениями соответствующего сообщества в целом. ; The study of political discourse in recent decades has become a popular areaof scientific studies both abroad and in Ukraine. But the complexity of political discourse as a phenomenon of political reality makes it difficult to adequately understand it and learn. Given the understanding of the political discourse as a set of political texts, incorporated by topic and updated in various forms of communication, there is a need to study political text. The very political text can be understood as a set of specific elements, such as sender, recipient and the context in which the message is transfered. This article focuses on the political sender as the author of political message. The author investigates its nature and role in political discourse by using political linguistics, semiotics and linguistics. In the article is analyzed the sender as author of political text, are called different approaches to its definition and classification. The author notes, that sender is as part of political communication as a style of the political message, that can be seen in different planes, particularly in the plane of brevity and eloquence, crisis and stability, democratic and nondemocratic governance, comic or tragic, etc. The paper established a correlation between the style of political messages and political discourse, political sentiments relevant community as a whole

Reuse of record except for individual research requires license from Congressional Information Service, Inc. ; Description based on: 96th Congress. ; Previously classed: Y 4.W 36:L 52/7/ and Y 4.W 36:WMCP. ; At head of title: Committee print. ; CIS Microfiche Accession Numbers: CIS 93 H782-5, CIS 91 H782-5, CIS 89 H782-51, CIS 87 H782-26, CIS 85 H782-6, CIS 83 H782-5, CIS 81 H782-8, CIS 79 H782-19, CIS 77 H782-3, CIS 75 H782-1, CIS 73 H782-1, CIS 71 H782-6 ; Microfiche. ; Mode of access: Internet.

EU policy can consider and include EU-LAC-MUSEUMS project findings. A great deal can be achieved in and through community-based museums, as distinguished from mainstream museums often associated with certain demographics and funding structures that receive state attention and support. Community-based museums offer a lens through which to interrogate both macro and micro, global and local relations. Community-based museums are often under-represented in policy directions, and yet our research findings demonstrate that social engagement and pro-active strategies advanced through these entities have the potential to challenge and enhance existing EU policy that seeks to contribute to development in Latin America and the Caribbean, making it more relevant and sustainable for the future. The approach to most of our work can be described as grass-roots. It involves the communities we work with at all stages of the research and innovation process – from conception to planning, implementation, dissemination and evaluation – to ensure that the impact is felt within communities. By way of the Brussels Policy Round Table and this report, we aspire to create a bridge between policy and practice, allowing community voices to speak back through our project outputs to the policy makers and funders whose priorities we are implementing.