Vertrauensbildung und Erweiterung der Problemwahrnehmung: Die Rolle der UNO im Gruppengeflecht der internationalen Beziehungen
In: Die Wiederentdeckung der Vereinten Nationen, S. 53-64
2160051 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Die Wiederentdeckung der Vereinten Nationen, S. 53-64
In: Deutsche Aussenpolitik, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 20-39
ISSN: 0011-9881
World Affairs Online
In: Internationale Beziehungen als System, S. 17-60
In: Veröffentlichungen des Sudetendeutschen Archivs in München 6
In: SPD und Parlamentarismus
In: Heidelberger Kommentar
In: Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen: ZIB, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 171-184
ISSN: 0946-7165
In: Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen: ZIB, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 75-101
ISSN: 0946-7165
In: Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen: ZIB, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 161-186
ISSN: 0946-7165
World Affairs Online
In: European journal of international relations, Band 26, Heft 3, S. 922-946
ISSN: 1460-3713
Many policy and academic debates focus on the extent to which Russia is a revisionist power challenging the 'liberal world order'. However, there is little agreement on the primary motives explaining the behaviour of Russia, some pointing to her unsatisfied great power ambitions and neo-imperial ideologies, and others to genuine security concerns. Adjudicating those claims is important because of their policy implications for engagement and/or deterrence towards Russia. This article contributes to this debate through a theoretical contribution to practice-based approaches to International Relations. Using De Certeau's understanding of practices, it analyses Russian diplomatic practices in multilateral security organisations and illustrates how this helps infer foreign policy motives, contrary to the field-specific relationalism of Bourdieu-inspired practice approaches. Empirically, it builds on 126 interviews and participant observation in three multilateral security organisations (the United Nations, the NATO–Russia Council and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe). The article shows that at least since 2014, Russian diplomats in the three organisations consistently defend policies and use narratives that reveal more interest in status recognition, sometimes at the expense of security concerns.
In: Nuclear law bulletin, Band 2016, Heft 1, S. 103-103
ISSN: 1609-7378
In: Nuclear law bulletin, Band 2015, Heft 2, S. 105-105
ISSN: 1609-7378
In: Nuclear law bulletin, Band 2015, Heft 1, S. 93-144
ISSN: 1609-7378
In: Nuclear law bulletin, Band 2014, Heft 2, S. 143-173
ISSN: 1609-7378