Suchergebnisse

.

Dans le contexte de la modernité avancée, les mouvements sociaux ont dû revoir leurs cadres d'action, leurs représentations du social et du politique de même que leurs rapports aux institutions. Le paradigme traditionnel auquel renvoient la majorité des travaux sociologiques ne permet pas de saisir toute la complexité et l'ambivalence qui caractérisent les relations que les acteurs construisent dans leurs rapports aux institutions. En se démarquant de la thèse de l'institutionnalisation partielle et de la perspective interactionniste, les auteurs proposent une nouvelle problématique des enjeux institutionnels et de l'institutionnalisation des mouvements sociaux qui prend en compte les changements majeurs caractéristiques de la modernité avancée. C'est ce qui les conduit à examiner trois processus significatifs à cet égard, à savoir la réflexivité, la globalisation et l'authenticité.

The Mellon Mays Fellows who comprise the Tapestries Editorial Collective for 2016 provide context for the works they have chosen to include in the fifth issue of the journal.

Although international human rights law establishes the individual right to receive reparations, collective reparations have been considered a common response from judicial and non-judicial bodies to reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. As such, collective reparations have been awarded within the field of international human rights law, international criminal law and transitional justice. Yet the concept, content and scope of collective reparations are rather unspecified. To date, neither the judicial nor the non-judicial bodies that have granted this kind of reparations have ever defined them.00This book presents the first study on collective reparations. It aims to shed light on the legal framework, content and scope of collective reparations, and to the relationship between collective reparations and the individual right to reparations. In order to do so, the book analyses specific case law from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the International Criminal Court and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Additionally, the practices of non-judicial mechanisms were examined, specifically those of the Peruvian and Moroccan Truth Commissions and of two mass claims compensation commissions (the United Nations Compensation Commission and the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission). Finally, it provides an overview of the challenges that collective reparations present to the fields of international human rights law and international criminal law, including in their implementation

Although international human rights law establishes the individual right to receive reparations, collective reparations have been considered a common response from judicial and non-judicial bodies to reparations for victims of gross violations of human rights. As such, collective reparations have been awarded within the field of international human rights law, international criminal law and transitional justice. Yet the concept, content and scope of collective reparations are rather unspecified. To date, neither the judicial nor the non-judicial bodies that have granted this kind of reparations have ever defined them. This book presents the first study on collective reparations. It aims to shed light on the legal framework, content and scope of collective reparations, and to the relationship between collective reparations and the individual right to reparations. In order to do so, the book analyses specific case law from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, the International Criminal Court and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. Additionally, the practices of non-judicial mechanisms were examined, specifically those of the Peruvian and Moroccan Truth Commissions and of two mass claims compensation commissions (the United Nations Compensation Commission and the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission). Finally, it provides an overview of the challenges that collective reparations present to the fields of international human rights law and international criminal law, including in their implementation