ASEAN–China Economic Relations
In: Development in practice, Volume 18, Issue 2, p. 293-295
ISSN: 1364-9213
3102651 results
Sort by:
In: Development in practice, Volume 18, Issue 2, p. 293-295
ISSN: 1364-9213
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies
"International Relations (IR) in Colombia" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Initiative for policy dialogue at Columbia: challenges in development and globalization
Over the past decades, the world has seen a dramatic increase in inequality. To what extent have the rules that govern the global economy, formally or informally, affected this trend? How can global governance arrangements be reformed to counteract them?In this book, an interdisciplinary group of prominent scholars scrutinizes how the rules of global economic governance-or the lack thereof-determine the extent and growth of inequality. Economists, political scientists, lawyers, and other experienced contributors bring together cutting-edge research on global rule making and inequality, exploring how international rules can exacerbate inequalities among and within countries to show the crucial interactions between policy choices and the distribution of income and wealth. They provide an in-depth examination of the rules governing foreign-investment protection, cross-border financial flows, and intellectual property rights, as well as the lack of standards governing international taxation and the channels through which they might affect inequality. With a focus on ambitious and achievable reforms, this book offers concrete steps toward global economic governance capable of counteracting inequitable wealth distribution and bringing about fairer economic growth.
World Affairs Online
In: International interactions: empirical and theoretical research in international relations, Volume 41, Issue 3, p. 427-452
ISSN: 1547-7444
Außenpolitische und sicherheitspolitische Fragen. Beurteilung
der Kernwaffenversuche und Abrüstungsfragen. Vergleich von USA
und UdSSR.
Themen: Wichtigste Probleme des Landes; Zufriedenheit mit dem
Lebensstandard; bester Freund und größter Feind des Landes;
Einstellung zu Frankreich, den USA, zu Großbritannien, zur
Sowjetunion und zu China; präferierte Ost-West-Orientierung des
Landes; Übereinstimmung der Landesinteressen mit den Interessen
der Sowjetunion oder den Interessen der USA; Beurteilung der
amerikanischen und sowjetischen Außenpolitik sowie deren
Friedensbemühungen; Vergleich der wissenschaftlichen,
wirtschaftlichen und militärischen Stärke der beiden
Weltmächte; Präferenz für die Sowjetunion oder für Nordamerika
als militärische Führungsmacht; vermuteter Gewinner des
Wettkampfs der Wirtschaftssysteme; Bereitschaft zu einem
verstärkten europäischen Verteidigungsbeitrag in der Nato;
Einschätzung der Gefahr eines sowjetischen Angriffs; Vergleich
zwischen Sowjetbürgern und Amerikanern bezüglich der gewährten
Freiheiten und des gerechten Anteils am Wohlstand des Landes;
perzipierte Annäherung der beiden Weltmächte; Einstellung zu
einem Abkommen zwischen den USA und der Sowjetunion zur
Abschaffung von Kernwaffenversuchen und erwartete Auswirkung
auf den Lebensstandard; USA oder UdSSR als Vorreiter für
Abrüstungsabkommen; Kenntnisse über das Verbot von
unterirdischen Atomversuchen im Rahmen eines solchen Abkommens;
Einstellung zu einer kernwaffenfreien Zone in Europa;
Einstellung zu einer Vereinigung Westeuropas; gewünschte
Haltung einer Europäischen Gemeinschaft gegenüber den
Vereinigten Staaten; perzipierter Einfluß von Organisationen
und Verbänden im Lande; Einstellung zu verstärkten
amerikanischen Privatinvestitionen im Lande und zu einer
europäischen Entwicklungshilfe; perzipierte Annäherung der
Sowjetunion und Rotchina sowie Einschätzung der Entwicklung des
sowjetisch-chinesischen Konflikts; wahrscheinlichster Auslöser
und mögliche Umstände eines Atomkriegs; Kenntnis der
UNO-Mitgliedschaft des Landes; Einstellung zur UNO und zu einer
eigenen UNO-Streitmacht; Einschätzung der Behandlung von
Farbigen in Frankreich, Amerika, in der Sowjetunion und in
Südafrika (in Großbritannien auch nach der Behandlung im
eigenen Lande gefragt); Kenntnis von Rassenproblemen in den USA
und Einfluß dieser Kenntnisse auf das Amerikabild; Interesse an
der internationalen Politik; besonders bewunderter Politiker in
Westeuropa; Hören ausländischer Radiosender;
Gewerkschaftsmitgliedschaft; Parteipräferenz.
Interviewerrating: Schichtzugehörigkeit des Befragten.
Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Interviewdauer; Anzahl der
Kontaktversuche; Kooperationsbereitschaft des Befragten;
Ortsgröße; Interviewdatum (nur BRD).
In Italien wurde zusätzlich gefragt: Gelesene Tageszeitungen;
Veränderung der Wahlentscheidung im Vergleich zum Vorjahr;
Radiobesitz und Wellenbereiche; Interviewort.
GESIS
This book explores the political economy of China-Pakistan economic corridor, a major pilot project for China's "One Belt, One Road" initiatives. Pakistan will provide China with not only a pathway access to the Indian Ocean, Middle East and Africa, but also vital connections to the Trans-Asia railway network that links Southeast Asia, South Asia and West Asia. This book analyzes how domestic factors in Pakistan will affect China's $46 billion investments. It will be of interest to scholars, policymakers, and journalists. Bai Gao is Professor of Sociology at Duke University. His research areas include economic sociology, comparative-historical sociology, international political economy, and comparative political economy. Gao is the author of Economic Ideology and Japanese Industrial Policy: Developmentalism from 1931 to 1965, Japan's Economic Dilemma: The Institutional Origins of Prosperity and Stagnation, and Western Social Sciences and Japanese Studies. He is also an editor for High-Speed Rail: An Analysis of the Chinese Innovation System, and China-Europe Freight Trains: State Building and Market Building. Zhihong Zhen is Professor of School of Sociology and Political Science in Shanghai University, Director of the Center for International Political Economy of Shanghai University, Director of the Institute of Gerontology of Shanghai University, and Secretary-General of Economics Sociology Committee of Chinese Sociology Association. His main research area include economic sociology, population aging, and international political economy
Foreign policy is an essential component of Egypt's general state policy. Together with its traditional diplomatic and political functions, and given that development policy is considered a key objective, the Egyptian Foreign Ministry participates in the country's development effort by trying to attract foreign investment, obtain economic assistance and facilitate technology transfers. Egyptian diplomacy also seeks to maintain strong bilateral and multilateral relationships, which is another essential goal of Egypt's general policy. Strengthening traditional friendly relations as well as building new relationships enables Egypt to exercise influence and pursue its national interest all over the globe.
BASE
In: Asian affairs: an American review, Volume 46, Issue 2/3, p. 63-79
ISSN: 1940-1590
This article seeks to examine Vietnam-Australia bilateral relations from 2000 to 2018. It will focus on political and economic dynamics of this relationship. Canberra and Hanoi established initial diplomatic contacts in 1973. After the first 27 years of approaching each other, they both recognized that it is in their mutual interests to strengthen and deepen their political and economic linkages. Therefore, from 2001 to 2018, Hanoi and Canberra continued to take practical steps to create political establishments and economic chances for greater successes in their relations. Like any other bilateral relations in world politics, there may be differences between Canberra and Hanoi, yet these differences have not prevented them from bringing their relationship to a new height. (Asian Aff/GIGA)
World Affairs Online
In: Research in maritime history 6
In: The Palgrave Macmillan history of international thought
"This book critically investigates the historiography of International Relations. For the past fifteen years, the field has witnessed the development of a strong interest in the history of the discipline. The chapters in this edited volume, written by some of the field's preeminent disciplinary historians, all manifest the best of an innovative and exciting generation of scholarship on the history of the discipline of International Relations. One of the objectives of this volume is to take stock of the historical turn. Yet this volume is not simply a stock-taking exercise, as it also intends to identify the limitations and blind spots of the recent historiographical literature. The chapters consider a range of diverse thinkers and examine their impact on understanding various dimensions of the field's history."--