Oligarchic corruption: scenarios and technologies of external influence in Ukraine (theoretical and sociological aspect)
In: Hrani: naukovo-teoretyčnyj alʹmanach, Band 23, Heft 12, S. 58-67
ISSN: 2413-8738
The article describes the relationship between oligarchic corruption and scenarios of external influence from the EU/NATO and Russia geopolitical alliances. It is concluded that the corruption of the oligarchs is one of the key conditions for effective external influence on Ukraine and the limitation of its cultural, political and economic sovereignty. At the same time, information campaigns by intellectual groups of opinion leaders are combined in media discourses with public communication of political actors and are converted into relevant decisions of the legislature and the executive.It is emphasized that the information confrontation takes place in line with two discourses: populist-pro-Russian and liberal-pro-Western. On the part of pro-Russian external actors, key arguments relate to the identification of the fight against corruption with the restriction of Ukraine's cultural and political sovereignty by the EU and NATO. For external influence through the oligarchy on the authorities and administration of Ukraine, the Russian Federation uses cultural and media trendsetting, criminal curation and political emissary.It is noted that the EU and NATO are counter-propaganda in the direction of continuous "pushing" programs to reform the political, economic, educational system with the leitmotif of combating corruption and the use of cultural and media trendsetting, political emissary and touring. For EU and US societies, political touring is one of the priority forms of external influence because of the significant benefits that external centers of power derive from the placement of groups of influence in state institutions. It was stated, first of all, that the surplus of non-ruling elites was moved to the periphery, which allowed to get rid of the corresponding inconveniences due to their possible transformation into political actors. Secondly, the strengthening of the cultural influence of society through the conquest by political tourists of the status of temporary role models in the field of public administration. Third, political touring is beneficial to the oligarchy because of the possibility of avoiding responsibility for corruption by transferring it to external centers of power. Fourth, political touring allows to maintain the image of Ukraine as a failed state, which is unable to recruit and select its own elites and create social elevators for leaders.