The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
450392 results
Sort by:
In: American political science review, Volume 34, Issue 5, p. 983-986
ISSN: 1537-5943
This paper has been prepared primarily for the purpose of suggesting certain aspects of the teaching problem in political science upon which our attention at this round table may be focused with profit. At the same time, I believe that the issues raised are of more than passing concern and should be considered as among the most important for political scientists during the coming decade. Furthermore, although this round table discussion has been limited to the basic course in political science, I believe that the time has come for appraisal of the entire undergraduate political science curriculum. Such an appraisal should concern itself with the content of our courses (which has been growing like Topsy) and the quality of teaching (which has traditionally been ignored on the ground that the professional educators are alone concerned with teaching methods).Turning now to the specific subject of this round table, I believe that any discussion of the basic course in political science must concern itself with the following questions: (1) the objective of the course; (2) the materials most conducive to the attainment of that objective; (3) the methods most suitable in the organization and presentation of these materials; and (4) the personnel for teaching the basic course. I should like to make certain brief observations in regard to each of these questions.
In: American political science review, Volume 41, Issue 5, p. 978-989
ISSN: 1537-5943
The field known as "political science" is in many ways a peculiarly American discipline. Although it plays a minor rôle in some European universities, and none in the rest, this particular field of the social sciences is of great importance in the United States. Besides a mounting interest in the study of government on the undergraduate level in this country, there has been a steady growth of professional training for the public service in special schools of public administration and in international affairs and diplomacy, both closely related to and usually staffed in part at least by political scientists.To the non-American inquiring as to the reason for this special development, no exhaustive answer can be given at the present time. But mention may be made of a number of factors which have contributed to this phenomenal and persistent growth. In the first place, political science, backed by the ancient tradition of Aristotle's Politics, has a central appeal to young men and women seeking an integrated and over-all approach to the "great society" of a free and intensely democratic people. The pride Americans used to take in their political "institutions," which was noted by many a foreign traveller, has in this age of democratic disillusionment found an uneasy refuge in academic study of the history of political thought and institutions. The well-known practical, or rather activist, tendency of American scholars has turned many an economist, such as John R. Commons, to legislative halls and thus has pushed the problems of government into the center of attention. Historians with similar propensities, like Charles A. Beard, came to enrich the work of political science.
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Volume 15, Issue 1, p. 101-114
ISSN: 0017-257X
Political scientists have portrayed women in a stereotypical, biased manner. Using research by many political scientists to illustrate these points, the content & effects of male bias in political science are explored. Three phenomena are observed: (1) grossly insulting comments about women; (2) assumptions leading to a false assessment of women's political nature & potential; & (3) the exclusion of women & issues relevant to women from serious consideration. The effect of these biases is the contamination of the conduct, findings, & conclusions of political science research. P. Montgomery.
In: British journal of political science, Volume 2, Issue 1, p. 109-115
ISSN: 1469-2112
I want to clarify the scientific status of contemporary political science. To do this, it is necessary to go into the question of what science means. I take it for granted that the samiliar charcterization of science as explanation is cssentially correct. But what does explanation mean?
Comprising three volumes of contributions from expert authors from around the world, The SAGE Handbook of Political Science aims to frame, assess and synthesize research in the field, helping to define and identify its current and future developments.
In: American political science review, Volume 25, Issue 2, p. 439-442
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Philippine political science journal, Volume 36, Issue 1, p. 125-126
ISSN: 2165-025X
In: Philippine political science journal, Volume 25, Issue 48, p. 169-169
ISSN: 2165-025X
In: Philippine political science journal, Volume 24, Issue 47, p. 195-195
ISSN: 2165-025X
In: Philippine political science journal, Volume 23, Issue 46, p. 195-195
ISSN: 2165-025X
In: Philippine political science journal, Volume 22, Issue 45, p. 165-165
ISSN: 2165-025X
In: Philippine political science journal, Volume 21, Issue 44, p. 185-185
ISSN: 2165-025X