Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 47, Heft 4, S. 744-744
ISSN: 1363-030X
560261 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 47, Heft 4, S. 744-744
ISSN: 1363-030X
In: Political science, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 162
ISSN: 0112-8760, 0032-3187
In: The southwestern social science quarterly, S. 1-6
ISSN: 0276-1742
In: PS, Band 13, Heft 1, S. 6-9
ISSN: 2325-7172
For a discipline that lies beyond the boundaries of what traditionally has been considered the domain of the humanities, political science has not fared badly at the endowment established to promote humanistic knowledge. However, that is a subjective judgment: One of the dubious charms of the NEH has been its failure, until recently, to implement a data collection and retrieval system that could yield information concerning the magnitude of support received by a given discipline. At long last an ADP system, known to its friends as AUGUSTUS (its enemies call it other things), is undergoing debugging. It is scheduled to be fully operational by the end of the current fiscal year.Two additional factors make it difficult to isolate grants awarded in political science. The Endowment, unlike the National Science Foundation, divides its workload principally by the type of audiences at which funded projects are aimed—e.g., the general public, research scholars, educators, community groups—rather than by discipline. Thus, just as there is no English program, so there is no political science program at the Endowment. Projects conducted by political scientists are eligible to compete in all of the funding categories administered by the Divisions of Fellowships, Research Grants, Public Programs, and Education Programs. To the extent that they express local or regional interests and involve a general out-of-school public, they may also compete for funds offered by the State Humanities Committees which serve as regrant agencies for the Endowment.
In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift: PVS : German political science quarterly, Band 50, Heft 1, S. 180-182
ISSN: 0032-3470
In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift: PVS : German political science quarterly, Band 44, Heft 3, S. 433-434
ISSN: 0032-3470
Arthur Lupia is the Hal R Varian Collegiate Professor of Political Science. He examines how people make decisions when they lack information and how they manage complex information flows. He has advised many science organisations on how to communicate science to broad audiences and how to convey complicated ideas in politicized contexts. He has received multiple honors for this work, including the Ithiel de Sola Pool Award from the American Political Science Association, and the (U.S.) National Academy of Sciences' Award for Initiatives in Research. He is an elected member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He has been a Guggenheim Fellow and was one of the inaugural Andrew Carnegie Fellows. In his opinion, the public value of science and transparency in research is up to scientists.
BASE
Arthur Lupia is the Hal R Varian Collegiate Professor of Political Science. He examines how people make decisions when they lack information and how they manage complex information flows. He has advised many science organisations on how to communicate science to broad audiences and how to convey complicated ideas in politicized contexts. He has received multiple honors for this work, including the Ithiel de Sola Pool Award from the American Political Science Association, and the (U.S.) National Academy of Sciences' Award for Initiatives in Research. He is an elected member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He has been a Guggenheim Fellow and was one of the inaugural Andrew Carnegie Fellows. In his opinion, the public value of science and transparency in research is up to scientists.
BASE
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 481-482
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 855-866
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 619-620
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy
Philosophy of Social Science: A Contemporary Introduction examines perennial questions of philosophy through engaging the empirical study of society. Questions of normativity concern the place of values in social scientific inquiry. Questions of naturalism concern the relationship between the natural and the social sciences. And questions of reductionism ask how social institutions relate to the people who constitute them. This accessible text offers a comprehensive overview of debates in the field, with special attention to new research programs. Topics include the relationship of social policy to social science, interpretive research, cognitive and evolutionary explanations, intentional action explanation, rational choice theory, conventions and social norms, joint intentionality, causal inference, and experimentation. Detailed examples of social scientific research motivate the philosophical questions and illustrate the important concepts. Treating philosophical commitments as implicit in social science, students of the social sciences will benefit from its application of philosophical argument to methodological and theoretical problems. The text argues that social science transforms philosophical questions, and students of philosophy will benefit from its direct engagement with contemporary debates. The Second Edition provides updates with the most recent literature and adds two new chapters: one on modeling and one on the role of race and gender in the social sciences. Key Updates to the Second Edition: A new chapter on "Modeling and Explaining," which explores how models represent social systems and whether highly idealized models explain A new chapter on "Race and Other Social Constructions," capturing much of the recent empirical research and philosophical interest in the social construction of categories like race and gender Revised and updated chapters throughout, clarifying earlier presentations and bringing discussions from the First Edition into line with new research Updated annotated Further Reading lists, which now include relevant publications from 2013 to 2022.
"How should we theorize about the social world? How can we integrate theories, models and approaches from seemingly incompatible disciplines? Does theory affect social reality? This state-of-the-art collection addresses contemporary methodological questions and interdisciplinary developments in the philosophy of social science. Facilitating a mutually enriching dialogue, chapters by leading social scientists are followed by critical evaluations from philosophers of social science. This exchange showcases recent major theoretical and methodological breakthroughs and challenges in the social sciences, as well as fruitful ways in which the analytic tools developed in philosophy of science can be applied to understand these advancements. The volume covers a diverse range of principles, methods, innovations and applications, including scientific and methodological pluralism, performativity of theories, causal inferences and applications of social science to policy and business. Taking a practice-orientated and interactive approach, it offers a new philosophy of social science grounded in and relevant to the emerging social science practice. "--Bloomsbury Publishing
In: The southwestern social science quarterly, Band 31, S. 39-48
ISSN: 0276-1742