Computer Assisted Clinical Decision Making
In: Journal of social service research, Band 6, Heft 3-4, S. 119-132
ISSN: 1540-7314
1779921 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of social service research, Band 6, Heft 3-4, S. 119-132
ISSN: 1540-7314
In: Social work research & abstracts, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 14-21
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 8, Heft 7, S. 1170-1177
ISSN: 1541-0072
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 57, Heft 5, S. 1171
ISSN: 2327-7793
In: Behavioral science, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 19-25
In: Forum for social economics, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 39-48
ISSN: 1874-6381
In: Journal of broadcasting: publ. quarterly, Band 18, Heft 4, S. 465-472
ISSN: 2331-415X
In: Behavioral science, Band 18, Heft 1, S. 7-19
In: The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies, S. 469-484
In: Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, S. 133-154
In: Communication and Group Decision Making, S. 215-241
In: Behavioral science, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 98-104
This entry has been realised in the framework of the H2020-MSCA-RISE-2018 project "LoGov - Local Government and the Changing Urban-Rural Interplay". LoGov aims to provide solutions for local governments that address the fundamental challenges resulting from urbanisation. To address this complex issue, 18 partners from 17 countries and six continents share their expertise and knowledge in the realms of public law, political science, and public administration. LoGov identifies, evaluates, compares, and shares innovative practices that cope with the impact of changing urban-rural relations in five major local government areas: (1) local responsibilities and public services, (2) local financial arrangements, (3) structure of local government, (4) intergovernmental relations of local governments, and (5) people's participation in local decision-making. The present entry addresses people's participation in local decision-making in Moldova. The entry forms part of the LoGov Report on Moldova. To access the full version of the report on Moldova, other practices regarding people's participation in local decision-making and to receive more information about the project, please visit: https://www.logov-rise.eu/. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 823961.
BASE
In: Political behavior, Band 43, Heft 4, S. 1411-1432
ISSN: 1573-6687
AbstractDo politicians use the representativeness heuristic when making judgements, that is, when they appraise the likelihood or frequency of an outcome that is unknown or unknowable? Heuristics are cognitive shortcuts that facilitate judgements and decision making. Oftentimes, heuristics are useful, but they may also lead to systematic biases that can be detrimental for decision making in a representative democracy. Thus far, we lack experimental evidence on whether politicians use the representativeness heuristic. To contribute to and extend the existing literature, we develop and conduct a survey experiment with as main participants Dutch elected local politicians from the larger municipalities (n = 211). This survey experiment examines whether politician participants display two decision-making biases related to the representativeness heuristic: the conjunction error and scope neglect. We also run the experiment with a student sample (n = 260), mainly to validate the experimental design. Our findings show that politician participants neglect scope in one scenario and that they display the conjunction error in two of three scenarios. These results suggest that politician participants use the representativeness heuristic. Conversely, our third conjunction error scenario does not find evidence for politician participants displaying this bias. As we discuss in the article, the latter may be an artifact of our experimental design. Overall, our findings contribute fundamentally to our understanding of how politicians process information and how this influences their judgements and decision making.
In: Philippine political science journal, Band 9, Heft 13-14, S. 21-43
ISSN: 2165-025X