Suchergebnisse

The emergence & expansion of the administrative state after WWII has led to the inescapable truth that we live in an age of intense legal discipline at national, regional, & global levels. The globalization of the judicial world has been characterized as "a world historical transformation" involving the "rise of world constitutionalism" that is characterized by de Sousa Santos's interlegality, but globalized as the local legal forms & localizes globally for forms. The distinctive discontinuity & uneven forms of transnationalized legal relations suggest international legal theory is at odds with political realities of nonstate actors & nonstate law that are increasingly authoritative. The opportunities for the emergence of challenges to the statist & territorial foundations of international law provided by the conditions of postmodernity emanate from transnational business corporations, private business associations, individuals, groups, & global social movements. A critical globalization studies in international law should place the starting point of the study of analytical foundations of international law with a view to determining who or what interests are privileged or peripheral eyes by the legal doctrines, scrutinization of substantial areas to determine how marginalized peoples can be brought into the legal order, & analyzing the potential for integrating elements of global civil society into the international legal system through participation in the UN & other law creating bodies. References. J. Harwell

Kant's legal and political philosophy is essential for understanding and advancing international order. The article aims to posit arguments that confront the claims that Kant was just war theorist. Since that is the most opposed part of Kant's political philosophy, mostly due to the misleading interpretation of his argumentation, the author presents Kant's standpoint on the matters of just war and international order and discusses potential ambiguities between Kant's and his critics' theories. Furthermore, the consequences of opponents' arguments considering states of states, world republic and cosmopolitan democracy in contemporary political philosophy are debated. Finally, the possibility of consent between the three model solutions which are arising from the contemporary international order theory and Kant's position are compared and analysed. ; Kantova politička filozofija i filozofija prava od suštinskog su značaja za razumevanje i una pređenje međunarodnog poretka. Rad ima za cilj da izloži argumente koji se suprotstavljaju tvrdnjama da je Kant bio samo teoretičara rata. Budući da je to najkontroverzniji deo njego ve političe filozofije, uglavnom zbog krivog tumačenja njegove argumentacije, autor iznosi Kantovo stanovište o pitanjima pravednog rada i međunarodnog poretka i razmatra poten cijalna razilaženje između Kanta i teorija koje zastupaju njegovi kritičari. Nadalje, biće disku tovane posledice kontra argumenata vezanih za državu država, svetsku republiku i kosmo politsku demokratiju unutar savremene političke filozofije. Na kraju, upoređuju se i analiziraju mogućnosti saglasnosti između tri modela rešenja koja proističu iz savremene teorije među narodnog porekta.

The study aims to uncover the actor and political interests behind the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) in Indonesia. Using the accounting ecology framework developed by Gernon and Wallace (1995), this study examines the reason of why Indonesia adopts IFRS. The study finds that the adoption of IFRS in Indonesia is driven by international interests. Indonesia's membership in IFAC, IOSCO, and the G-20 has resulted in Indonesia approved the use of global accounting standards.