Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
3186411 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 167-176
ISSN: 1548-1433
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 489-490
ISSN: 1548-1433
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 593-593
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Taylor and Francis ebooks
In: Routledge series on interpretive methods
In: Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods
Preface -- Series editors' foreword -- What is relational interviewing? -- Building working relationships -- Selecting, finding, and approaching interviewees -- Strategies for conducting interviews -- I have my data : now what? -- The ethos of relational interviewing -- References -- Index.
In: Armed forces & society, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 193-206
ISSN: 1556-0848
Federal courts are called upon to decide claims by individual members of the armed forces that they have been mistreated by their superiors. A court's decision will often depend on the judge's perception of the necessity of the action in maintaining morale and discipline. Recently, government lawyers have begun to justify commanders' actions on the grounds of unit cohesion. This article examines those justifications by applying models developed to evaluate the use of social science findings in law suits and concludes that cohesion arguments have no place in the courtroom.
In: Methodology in the social sciences
In: Evaluation review: a journal of applied social research, Band 6, Heft 5, S. 579-600
ISSN: 1552-3926
How the magnitude of an experimental effect may be measured has been a matter of concern for at least two decades. The phenomenon of effect size is still not well under stood, and it cannot be inferred from statistical significance. In recent years various ways of assessing the amount of variance accounted for have been proposed as measures of magnitude of effect. Other writers have proposed rulesfor standardizing effect size, with the interpretations of the measures depending largely on intuitions buttressed by some further general empirical norms. All the methods of assessing effect size have serious flaws that limit their usefulness. The various statistical procedures for estimating variance accounted for are based on different statistical models and can produce rather sharply differing results, depending on the model employed. All the methods suffer from the limitation that they reflect to too great an extent the particular characteristics of the study being reported and hence have limited generalizability.
In: Evaluation review: a journal of applied social research, Band 6, Heft 5, S. 579-600
ISSN: 0193-841X, 0164-0259