Suchergebnisse

CCSI prepared a Scoping Study on Securing Adequate Legal Defense in Proceedings under International Investment Agreements (Scoping Study) for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. Also available are: 1) A summary version of the study (33 pages http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2020/02/CCSI-Executive-Summary-33-pages-Scoping-Study-on-an-IIL-Assistance-Mechanism-11-Nov-19-.pdf) 2) A webinar (March 24, 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrzAAoUzFso&feature=youtu.be), hosted by CCSI and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, discussed the Scoping Study and its findings (see also accompanying slides with speaking notes http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2020/02/Assistance-Mechanism-Scoping-Study-Webinar-Slides-March-24-2020-with-text-notes.pdf). 3) A webinar organized by UNCITRAL (April 21, 2020 https://uncitral.un.org/en/advisorycentrewebinar). CCSI presented the Scoping Study. A video link of the webinar along with CCSI's slides are available in English (with speaking notes) and French at that link. CCSI Senior Fellow Karl Sauvant also presented his UNCITRAL Academic Forum Concept paper, available at that link. The primary research question that the Scoping Study was requested to address is: How can adequate legal defense for parties in proceedings under International Investment Agreements (IIAs) be better secured?The Scoping Study provides a broad and inclusive overview of issues, concerns, empirical evidence, opinions, lessons learned, and proposed solutions as they relate to potential or expanded Assistance Mechanisms for international investment law. This Scoping Study reflects input received on a confidential basis from: government officials (of all World Bank Group economic development levels); individuals who have experience establishing or working for existing or attempted Assistance Mechanisms; individuals who have experience working for an arbitral institution; academics who have written on and/or advised states with respect to international investment law; private practitioners; representatives of non-governmental organizations; and representatives of private sector foreign investors. Concerns about IIAs and ISDS are much more fundamental than only the financial costs of participation in this system. The Scoping Study considers the range of problems that states and other actors have in engaging with and benefiting from international investment law and in participating effectively in investor-state dispute settlement processes related to: - investment policy-making - IIA negotiation - implementation and management of their IIAs and associated policies - dispute prevention - pre-dispute management and consultations - case staffing - anticipating, and potentially resolving, ISDS cases at an early phase - appointing arbitrators - dealing with uncertainty and ambiguity - working with experts - engaging in discovery of and managing information. The Scoping Study surveys a wide variety of models that Assistance Mechanisms, both with respect to international investment law as well as those employed in other legal fields, have taken and may take to address various concerns. Various cross-cutting issues emerged from analysis of and experience with existing Assistance Mechanisms. These cross-cutting issues should be considered by policy-makers as they consider the breadth and depth of services as well as the model(s) that an Assistance Mechanism could follow. The cross-cutting issues that are explored in depth in the Scoping Study include: - Quality, reliability, reputation, and trust; - Funding of an Assistance Mechanism and scope of services; - Costs of support and who bears them; - Stakeholder tensions; - Identifying the client/beneficiary; - Location, staffing, and remuneration; - Institutionalized vs. ad hoc mechanisms; - "Politics" surrounding the role of an Assistance Mechanism; and - Intersection with other reforms.

By-products of World War I and II were the creation of the League of Nations (1919) and subsequently the United Nations (1945). The primary objective of both these global organizations (past, present and future) has been to make the world a better place for humanity. Principally, this has meant working with member states to prevent wars and to carry out humanitarian activities wherever they are needed. Right from the time of the League of Nations, carrying out global mandate of this nature necessitated the creation of international civil service (ICS) to be composed of competent men and women, to assist the world public service to achieve it global mandate. This article argues that ICS is an indispensable instrument of the orderly government of mankind, and must be preserved. The importance of ICS has never been so crucial than today when the world socio-political landscape is more turbulent than in the 1940s when both the ICS and the United Nations were created. The article begins by tracing the history of the ICS from 1919 to the present. It examines the principles of ICS enunciated by the Council of the League of Nations In 1920 and enshrined in the U.N. Charter 25 years later. Here again, the sanctity of the ICS, argued in this article, depends upon upholding these principles by all players in the international system.

Abstract
The Guiding Principles on Shared Responsibility aim to 'substantiate the existing rules of the law of international responsibility' as they are codified in the International Law Commission's 2001 Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts and the 2011 Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations. This article examines the contribution of the Guiding Principles to the law of international responsibility and analyses some of their more controversial features, where the Guiding Principles seek to significantly expand the scope of the existing rules and, conversely, where they could have been much more ambitious.