Suchergebnisse

The international documents oblige the Russian legislator to pay substantial attention to the issues of jurisdiction. These requirements are stipulated in paragraph 1 of Article 14 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, etc. The essence of these requirements is to provide the states with guarantees of the right to a fair public consideration of the case without any delay by a competent court.The issues of the court competence in the criminal cases in Russia are regulated in Article 31 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The significance of meeting the requirements of this article is in the fact that if there are some violations of the rules stipulated in Article 31, it automatically leads to a sentence cancellation. The sign of territorial jurisdiction, as a rule, is not violated, but there are not only the issues, but also the facts of violations and sentence cancellation concerning a compliance with the requirements of subject jurisdiction, i.e. which court should consider a particular criminal case in vertical direction. In such cases, the entire procedure starts again, of course, this is a nuisance for everyone. However, the arbitrary transfer of criminal cases from court to court is not allowed. In particular, no one can be deprived of the right to his case consideration by that court, to the jurisdiction of which it is attributed by law. This rule seems to be simple, but it should be impeccably observed.

The international documents oblige the Russian legislator to pay substantial attention to the issues of jurisdiction. These requirements are stipulated in paragraph 1 of Article 14 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, paragraph 1 of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, etc. The essence of these requirements is to provide the states with guarantees of the right to a fair public consideration of the case without any delay by a competent court.The issues of the court competence in the criminal cases in Russia are regulated in Article 31 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The significance of meeting the requirements of this article is in the fact that if there are some violations of the rules stipulated in Article 31, it automatically leads to a sentence cancellation. The sign of territorial jurisdiction, as a rule, is not violated, but there are not only the issues, but also the facts of violations and sentence cancellation concerning a compliance with the requirements of subject jurisdiction, i.e. which court should consider a particular criminal case in vertical direction. In such cases, the entire procedure starts again, of course, this is a nuisance for everyone. However, the arbitrary transfer of criminal cases from court to court is not allowed. In particular, no one can be deprived of the right to his case consideration by that court, to the jurisdiction of which it is attributed by law. This rule seems to be simple, but it should be impeccably observed.

The use of social networks is steadily increasing worldwide. Hundreds of users daily register in the different existing platforms, therefore, the content extracted from the social networks is fundamental for tasks such as sentiment analysis, detection of author profiles, identification of authors, opinions mining, plagiarism detection, calculation of similarity between texts and to develop robust systems that help to make decisions in related areas such as politics, education, economy, among others. This paper provides a lexical aid for the pre-processing of texts posted in social networks evolved for the subsequent languages: English, Spanish, Dutch and Italian.

Presenta plano general, plantas y detalles ; Fotocopia en ferroprusiato ; En el extremo superior: Linea Mar Mariel-Majana, 3a Zona (Sur), Isla de Cuba, Comandancia de Ingenieros del 3er. Cuerpo del Ejército

Mode of access: Internet. ; Las h. de lám. lit.: "Pauner f.t Bar.na 1781" ; Portada con viñeta xilográfica. ; Sign.: [parágrafo]-6[parágrafo]4, 7[parágrafo]2, A-Z4, 2A-2Z4, 3A-3C4.

Mode of access: Internet. ; Portada a dos tintas con esc. xil. ; Texto a dos columnas. ; Sign.: [calderón]8, A-Z8, 2A-2Z8, 3A-3D2, 3E8, 3F2, [parágrafo]8, 2[parágrafo]4.

Shipping list no.: 2014-0224-P. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; February 13, 2013. The impact of federal budget decision [on] families and communities -- February 26, 2013. The impact of federal investments on people, communities, and long-term economic growth -- March 5, 2013. Reducing the deficit by eliminating wasteful spending in the tax code -- May 22, 2013. Supporting broad-based economic growth and fiscal responsibility through tax reform -- June 4, 2013. Fiscal and economic effects of austerity -- June 26, 2013. Investing in our future: the impact of federal budget decisions on children -- July 23, 2013. The impact of sequestration on national security and the economy -- July 30, 2013. Containing health care costs: recent progress and remaining challenges -- September 24, 2013. The impact of political uncertainty on jobs and the economy. ; Mode of access: Internet.

'We All Black Innit?' Analysing Relations Between African and African-Caribbean Groups in Britain Louise Owusu-Kwarteng University of Greenwich, UK Sociological Research Online 22(2): 9 http://www.socresonline.org.uk/22/2/9.html DOI: 10.5153/sro.4265 Published: 29 May 2017 The author wishes to make clear that the work of Godfrey Mwakigale cited as 2009 in paragraph 1.3, 3.10, 5.4, 8.3 was actually published in 2007. The author apologises for this oversight.