Who Lends Before Banking Crises? Evidence from the International Syndicated Loan Market
In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP15737
2093864 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP15737
SSRN
Working paper
In: Vol-44-No.01 (XV): 2021 of Sambodhi Indological Research Journal of L.D.I.I with ISSN No. 2249-6661 in UGC Care Approved, Peer-Reviewed and Referred Journal with Impact Factor 5.80
SSRN
In: For citations: Shestak, Band & Savenkova, S. Features of international cooperation in obtaining digital evidence: the experience of European regulation Theory and Practice of Crime Investigation IX International Scientific and Practical Conference 15 April 2021 Krasnodar: Krasnodar Un
SSRN
In: The Journal of Financial Crises: Vol. 3 : Iss. 1, 20-62.
SSRN
In: "Research Handbook on EU data protection" edited by Kosta, Eleni and Leenes, Ronald, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Forthcoming
SSRN
The involvement of urban and regional governments in transnational cooperative arrangements and policy networks has led to considerable debate regarding the political and theoretical implications. This paper examines networking and cooperation between urban areas and regions in the UK and France with a shared sea border. Such cross-border cooperation involving local authorities in Europe is a growing phenomenon and has certain implications for the analysis of local and urban politics. Three study areas are examined in detail: the Transmanche region involving Kent County Council and the French region Nord-Pas-de-Calais; the Transmanche Metropole which includes Southampton, Portsmouth, Bournemouth and Poole in Britain and Caen, Rouen and Le Havre in France; the cooperative initiative between the English county of East Sussex and the French departements of Somme and Seine-Maritime. In all three case studies, the development of cooperation has been influenced by the availability of funds from the European Union Interreg programme which supports transfrontier networking. A number of political consequences of cross-border cooperation are identified. The implications of these policy initiatives for theories of urban politics are considered, including a discussion of the political and economic construction of competition and cooperation between cities and regions.
BASE
In: U of Michigan Law & Econ Research Paper No. 21-020
SSRN
In: Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecasts, Heft 3 (75)
ISSN: 2312-9824
In: Cultures & conflits: sociologie politique de l'international, Heft 119-120, S. 39-65
ISSN: 1777-5345
In: Fudan Journal of the humanities & social sciences, Band 14, Heft 1, S. 41-66
ISSN: 2198-2600
In: Post-communist economies, Band 33, Heft 2-3, S. 222-245
ISSN: 1465-3958
In: Contemporary politics, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 371-383
ISSN: 1469-3631
In: Human arenas: an interdisciplinary journal of psychology, culture, and meaning, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 440-457
ISSN: 2522-5804
In: The journal of developing areas, Band 54, Heft 3
ISSN: 1548-2278
This is the final version. Available on open access from Springer via the DOI in this record ; In the past year, a number of legal developments have accelerated discussions around whether intellectual property rights can be claimed in materials generated during the reproduction of public domain works. This article analyses those developments, focusing on the 2018 German Federal Supreme Court decision Museumsfotos, Art. 14 of the 2019 Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market Directive, and relevant provisions of the 2019 Open Data and the Re-use of Public Sector Information Directive. It reveals that despite the growing consensus for protecting the public domain, there is a lack of practical guidance throughout the EU in legislation, jurisprudence, and literature on what reproduction media might attract new intellectual property rights, from scans to photography to 3D data. This leaves ample room for copyright to be claimed in reproduction materials produced by new technologies. Moreover, owners remain able to impose other restrictive measures around public domain works and data, like onsite photography bans, website terms and conditions, and exclusive arrangements with third parties. This article maps out these various legal gaps. It argues the pro-open culture spirit of the EU Directives should be embraced and provides guidance for Member States and heritage institutions around national implementation.
BASE