ILO Convention 169 in the inter-American human rights system: consultation and consent
In: International journal of human rights, Band 24, Heft 2-3, S. 257-264
ISSN: 1744-053X
1027803 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International journal of human rights, Band 24, Heft 2-3, S. 257-264
ISSN: 1744-053X
In: Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, 2007
SSRN
In: Handbook on human rights 1 : Documents regarding human rights
In: Charles University in Prague Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2016/I/4
SSRN
Working paper
In: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law: MJ, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 97-99
ISSN: 2399-5548
The European Convention on Human Rights has become bogged down by an enormous workload, and settling a case has become an attractive alternative to ordinary proceedings. This book provides a full overview of the Court's friendly settlements and suggest ways they could be improved
In: Access to Justice as a Human Right, S. 135-152
In: Peace matters, Heft 49, S. 7-9
ISSN: 1350-3006
In: Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, Heft 111, S. 39-44
The article focuses on the judge's liability vilotaion of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. State of- ficials' wrongful acts result in liability of a state regardless of the fault of those officials are determined as axiomatic for the theory of law. The state agencies, where the officials are employed, are entitled to file regress suits in accordance with the procedure provided by law. In such a case, can- cellation or annulment of the wrongful act that causes damages, should not be regarded as a special precondition for the liability of the state official liable for committing such an act. The precondition of the liability of the official should be his or her fault. It is essential that the liability of a judge for issuing wrongful judicial acts, regarding his or her status, has its own peculiarities. First, according to international standards, liability of a judge for delivering an illegal judgment, that had causes financial damage and interfereance with personal rights and freedoms, is predetermined by his or her procedural independence and immunity. Secondly, compensation for losses incurred by the state as a result of a wrongful decision or conduct of a judge in the performance of his / her duties is established. In addition to this, the state has the right to bring regress suits against a judge who has caused such damages to individuals or legalentities.
In: Revue européenne de droit public Vol. 13.2001, No. 1 = 39
In: Journal für Rechtspolitik: JRP, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 35-35
ISSN: 1613-754X