Schiedsgerichte, internationale
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/hvd.32044097665061
"Sonder-abdruck aus dem Wörterbuch des deutschen staats- und verwaltungsrechts, begründet von Karl Freiherrn von Stengel", no. 102. ; Mode of access: Internet.
2537145 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/hvd.32044097665061
"Sonder-abdruck aus dem Wörterbuch des deutschen staats- und verwaltungsrechts, begründet von Karl Freiherrn von Stengel", no. 102. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
SSRN
Working paper
In: Lloyd's commercial law library
In: European Review of Private Law, Band 29, Heft 4, S. 583-610
ISSN: 0928-9801
This article examines the impact of EU law in international commercial arbitration. EU law has become increasingly relevant in the world of commercial arbitration and while this may not at first seem to be a problem, this article argues that EU law has a distinctive nature which makes it fundamentally incompatible with the arbitral legal order. In effect, the EU legal order has developed on the basis of a direct trilateral relationship between disputes involving EU law, national courts and the European Court. When we are concerned with ordinary judicial proceedings, this relationship is classically supported by the 'principle of effectiveness' identified in the case-law of the European Court, which requires national procedures to enable individuals to bring claims based on EU law. Crucially, however, the procedural demands that could be made by the EU legal order are limited by the twin 'principle of national procedural autonomy', meaning the Court refrains from directly prescribing modalities for access to national courts and leaves discretion for States to set procedures. Contrasting with this analytical framework, it is here argued that once claims based on EU law fall within the sphere of arbitration, the principle of national procedural autonomy is inoperative and the EU legal order can dictate the terms of review. It is submitted that the effectiveness of EU law is assured not by the standard principle of effectiveness but by the principle of effective judicial protection, thus securing the procedural primacy of EU law in the arbitral legal order.
In: Oxford international arbitration series
In: Journal of politics and law: JPL, Band 9, Heft 7, S. 242
ISSN: 1913-9055
Arbitration is one of the most important solutions to end enmity and replace judicial inquest. As international trading is extended, referring to judgment to solve the conflicts caused by commercial contracts has been rapidly rising which is a result of judgment benefits over justice authorities. Fastness and efficiency, law inquest cost, compromise nature of selecting the referees, and professional selection are among the most evident specifications of arbitration. Furthermore, Iran's involvement in the most significant judgment case of the last century i.e. the lawsuits filed between the Islamic Republic of Iran the United States of America after the victory of the revolution would double the essentiality of knowing this organization. Judgment may be either individual or organic (permanent) and also the number of referees needs to be one or three. The most important issue in the judge's inquest is to follow two factors including independence and impartiality from the beginning until the end of the inquest process. Violating these characteristics or the lack of one of both or other descriptions predicted in the arbitration contract would result in its violation by one side of the conflict or both of them. In the present paper, a comparison is conducted between the commonalty and distinction of Iran's international commercial arbitration in 1376 and international law.
In: Columbia journal of transnational law, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 449
ISSN: 0010-1931
In: Ius Inter Gentes 14
In: Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis no 3910
In: American journal of international law, Band 90, Heft 1, S. 40-63
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: Judicial settlement of international disputes no. 18
In: ICSID review: foreign investment law journal, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 57-81
ISSN: 2049-1999