Trade Adjustment Assistance at the U.S. Court of International Trade: The Year in Review
In: Georgetown Journal of International Law, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 137
2102737 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Georgetown Journal of International Law, Band 41, Heft 1, S. 137
SSRN
In: European Journal of International Law, Band 20, Heft 4, S. 1163-1194
SSRN
In: Chicago Journal of International Law, Band 8, Heft 2
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of International Criminal Justice, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 215-239
SSRN
In: International studies perspectives: ISP, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 45-55
ISSN: 1528-3585
In: Perceptions: journal of international affairs, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 214-216
ISSN: 1300-8641
In: Romanian journal of international affairs, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 233-241
ISSN: 1224-0958
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 30, Heft 6, S. 1503-1516
ISSN: 1930-6571
In: George Washington International Law Review, Band 38, S. 831
SSRN
In: La revue internationale et stratégique: revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut de Relations Internationales et Stratégiques (IRIS), Band 97, Heft 1, S. 129-138
In: La revue internationale et stratégique: revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut de Relations Internationales et Stratégiques (IRIS), Band 96, Heft 4, S. VII-VII
In: La revue internationale et stratégique: revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut de Relations Internationales et Stratégiques (IRIS), Band 78, Heft 2, S. V-V
In: La revue internationale et stratégique: revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut de Relations Internationales et Stratégiques (IRIS), Band 71, Heft 3, S. 113-116
In: La revue internationale et stratégique: revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut de Relations Internationales et Stratégiques (IRIS), Band 57, Heft 1, S. 170-171
In: Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta: naučnyj recenziruemyj žurnal = MGIMO review of international relations : scientific peer-reviewed journal, Heft 4(49), S. 235-247
ISSN: 2541-9099
The article discusses the key trends shaping the international regime on information security. International cooperation in this area at the global level encounters contradictions of state interest. The main actors of the information security are the United States, Russia, China and the EU countries (Britain, France and Germany). The main contradiction is developing between the US on one side and Russia and China on the other. EU countries occupy the middle position, gravitating to that of US. The article proves that international cooperation on information security will reflect the overall logic of the development of international cooperation, which is characterized by a new model of cooperation, with the participation of state and non-state actors, known as multi-stakeholder partnerships and multi-level cooperation. The logic of the formation of an international regime on information security is closest to the logic of the formation of the international non-proliferation regime. It is in the interest of Russia to support the trend towards regionalization of information security regime. Russia can form a regional information security regime in the former Soviet Union on the basis of the CSTO and SCO and potentially on a wider Eurasian space. Such regional regime would give Russia an opportunity to shape the international regime and closely monitor emerging information security issues in the former Soviet Union, and remove the potential threat of "color revolutions".