Regional Group Conferences of the American and Canadian Bar Associations on International Law
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 41, Heft 4, S. 905-908
ISSN: 2161-7953
2100316 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 41, Heft 4, S. 905-908
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 824-825
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 349-349
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 105-110
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 20, Heft 4, S. 747-750
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 326-330
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 796-812
ISSN: 2161-7953
We now come to the last part of what one might call the Greek tragedy, which was played in Hellas during the first three years of this world war with such marvelous success under Teutonic guidance. The events of June, 1916, laid bare the whole plot, unmasked the royal actors at Athens, and compelled France and England, the protecting Powers of Greece, at last to take drastic measures.The surrender of the "key" to Eastern Macedonia (the Roupel fortress) by Constantine to the Germano-Bulgarian forces was rightly considered by the guardians of Greece as a hostile act directed against them, demanding the adoption of appropriate measures for the security of their armies on the Balkan front. Their first measure to this end was the substitution of Allied authorities for those of Greece in the city of Salonika. The second was the refusal by Great Britain to supply coal to Greek ships. The three Entente Powers had previously warned the Greek Government that if it allowed the armies of their enemies to advance freely into Greek territory, such action would lead to serious consequences. Therefore, the Royal Government of Greece, fearing lest the Allies institute repressive measures of a more drastic character, informed the Entente Governments that the further advance of the Bulgarian troops into Greek territory would be prevented.
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 12, Heft 3, S. 562-588
ISSN: 2161-7953
Having examined the question of the casus foederìs of the Treaty of Alliance between Greece and Serbia, we shall now inquire whether the use of Greek territory by the Entente Powers for the purpose of carrying on military and naval operations against their enemies and the other forcible measures resorted to against Greece were justified either by reason of rights resulting from treaties, or on account of unneutral acts or omissions of the Government of Constantine.Before discussing the points at issue, it will be necessary to summarize seriatim the facts connected with each.It should be remembered that from the very beginning of the present war the Entente Powers have utilized the territorial waters of some islands in the Ægean Sea which were either under the military occupation of Greece or form part of her territory, and which the Allies subsequently occupied in order to further their military enterprises against Turkey. Thus, during the autumn of the year 1914, shortly after the entrance (November 5th) of the latter Power into the war as an ally of Germany and Austria, the fleets of the Entente Powers utilized the harbors and territory of some of the islands in the vicinity of the Straits of the Dardanelles as bases for their naval and, subsequently, military operations. The islands thus used for the prosecution of the war were Tenedos, Imbros, and Lemnos, and particularly the latter, on account of its convenient and safe harbor.
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 11, Heft 2, S. 327-357
ISSN: 2161-7953
The summary review in the previous article of the historical events which culminated in the creation of the Hellenic Kingdom, and the vicissitudes which Greece underwent from the time of the declaration of her independence up to the year 1911, when her Constitution of 1864 was revised, plainly show that the Hellenic people never for a moment thought of submitting themselves to autocracy, but on the contrary asserted their determination to live under a democracy. Hence the murder of their first president, or governor Capodistrias, the deposition of their first king, Otho, and the abjuration now by a large section of the Hellenic nation both in and out of Greece, of their present ruler, Constantine, who, under the cloak of the Constitution, rules the part of the country still under his dominion, not as a constitutional King of the Hellenes, but as an absolute monarch.
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 11, Heft 1, S. 46-73
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Nova et vetera iuris gentium
In: Ser. A: Modern international law 16
In: Foreign policy analysis: a journal of the International Studies Association, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 339-360
ISSN: 1743-8586
World Affairs Online
In: Yakovleva, S. (2020). Personal Data Transfers in International Trade and EU Law: A Tale of Two 'Necessities', The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 21(6), 881-919.
SSRN
In: Progress in nuclear energy: the international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear energy, Band 78, S. 347-348
ISSN: 0149-1970
In: Seid Demeke, The Role of International Human Rights Law in Improving Law of Internal Armed Conflict, Bahir Dar University Journal of Law, vol. 4, No. 2, 2014
SSRN