Zero-Sum World: Politics, Power and Prosperity After the Crash
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 53, Heft 5, S. 181-182
ISSN: 0039-6338
103762 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 53, Heft 5, S. 181-182
ISSN: 0039-6338
In: Comparative politics, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 245
ISSN: 2151-6227
In: Journal of international affairs, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 1-20
ISSN: 0022-197X
In: International theory: a journal of international politics, law and philosophy, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 574-578
ISSN: 1752-9727
In: Policy studies review: PSR, Band 14, Heft 1-2, S. 171
ISSN: 0278-4416
In: The Indian journal of political science, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 185
ISSN: 0019-5510
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 62, Heft 3, S. 916-920
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: International studies, Band 56, Heft 4, S. 292-307
ISSN: 0973-0702, 1939-9987
This article is an attempt to understand the idea of morality in two of the most influential philosophers Niccolo Machiavelli ( The Prince and Discourses) and Immanuel Kant ( Perpetual Peace and Metaphysical Elements of Justice). Machiavelli and Kant are chosen because both of them are the most cherished philosophers in their fields. Machiavelli's name is associated with realism, and he got a bad name because of his alleged cruel advice to maintain the state. His name is equalled with cunningness, murder, treachery. On the other hand, Kant is the founding figure of idealism in politics. His focus on categorical imperative and human capabilities to attain the higher moral goals made him one of the most well-known philosophers on idealism. To understand the ethical problems of the day emphasis is given to the classic writings of scholars who have written extensively on morality, justice, state, power, human rights and individual freedom. This article is an attempt to answer the following questions: Is the state in itself a highest moral actor? Can there be an individual morality above the state? What should be the yardstick to judge an act—the act in itself or the outcome of the act? What are the duties and rights of the individual in domestic society and can there be a similarity of morality at the level of political leaders in international politics? The paper argues that both Machiavelli and Kant were dealing with different contexts and societies, and morality for them had different meanings. However, the end justifies the means dictum is not the right way to understand Machiavelli on morality.
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 43, Heft 2, S. 251-260
ISSN: 1460-3691
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 245-246
ISSN: 1460-3691
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 43, Heft 2, S. 251-260
ISSN: 0010-8367
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 245-246
ISSN: 0010-8367
In: Cooperation and conflict: journal of the Nordic International Studies Association, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 77-88
ISSN: 0010-8367
In: Rethinking Asia and international relations
Introduction -- Human rights according to China -- China's actions over the years on human rights and international politics : more of the same or fundamental change? -- Concern about the domestic threat -- China's voting on non-country-specific human rights resolutions -- Calling out developed countries, but Protecting developing countries -- Conclusion.
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 245-305
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
World Affairs Online