Teaching history in schools: The politics of textbooks in India
In: History workshop journal: HWJ, Heft 67, S. 99-110
ISSN: 1363-3554
1576018 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: History workshop journal: HWJ, Heft 67, S. 99-110
ISSN: 1363-3554
In: International political science review: IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique : RISP, Band 30, Heft 5, S. 543-554
ISSN: 0192-5121
In: Presidential studies quarterly, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 74-88
ISSN: 0360-4918
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 37, Heft 5, S. 713-719
ISSN: 0090-5917
In: APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: International journal / Canadian International Council: Canada's journal of global policy analysis, Band 64, Heft 2, S. 597-600
ISSN: 0020-7020
In: International relations of the Asia-Pacific: a journal of the Japan Association of International Relations, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 197-200
ISSN: 1470-482X
In: Small wars & insurgencies, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 391-399
ISSN: 0959-2318
In: Journal of church and state: JCS, Band 51, Heft 4, S. 697-699
ISSN: 0021-969X
In: Acta politica: AP ; international journal of political Science, Band 43, Heft 4, S. 504-507
ISSN: 1741-1416
In: Journal of political ecology: JPE ; case studies in history and society, Band 15, Heft 1
ISSN: 1073-0451
This article examines the intricacy within stylized debates that surround conservation and the regulation of wildlife trade in Southeast Asia. Illegal and unregulated trade in wildlife has been characterized by conservation groups as a great risk for wildlife worldwide and the prime threat for remaining wildlife populations in Laos. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) is the centrepoint of the global discourse on wildlife trade. Popular representations of wildlife trade promoted by conservation organizations construct an image of regulation through CITES as a global necessity. The assumed morality of such interventions can provoke counter accusations about the immorality of impositions by Western conservationists. Yet both of these competing representations of wildlife trade regulation encourage externally-focused moralized debates that obscure the internal dynamics within global conservation, national policy formation and local practice. Recognition of the simplifications that characterize these three domains cautions against any idealized contrast between global hegemony and local resistance in critical studies of conservation. Instead, the focus becomes the contestation that is often hidden within such dichotomies. Keywords: Conservation, wildlife, Lao PDR, CITES
In: Australian journal of international affairs: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 62, Heft 4, S. 441-459
ISSN: 1465-332X
In: Social movement studies: journal of social, cultural and political protest, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 225-246
ISSN: 1474-2837
In: Marine policy, Band 32, Heft 6, S. 913-919
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: African identities, Band 6, Heft 4, S. 345-371
ISSN: 1472-5851