Climate Change and Intellectual Property
In: European Journal of Risk Regulation, p. 72, March 2010
18593 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: European Journal of Risk Regulation, p. 72, March 2010
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
In: Emperor International Journal of Library and Information Technology Research 2021
SSRN
In: THE LAW OF THE FUTURE AND THE FUTURE OF LAW: VOLUME II, p. 337, Sam Muller, Stavros Zouridis, Morly Frishman and Laura Kistemaker, eds., Torkel Opsahl, 2012
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: Santa Clara Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper
SSRN
SSRN
SSRN
In: Jorge L. Contreras, Intellectual Property Licensing and Transactions: Theory and Practice, Forthcoming
SSRN
Working paper
In: Clarendon law lectures
In: Voprosy ėkonomiki: ežemesjačnyj žurnal, Heft 3, S. 119-141
With the acceleration of technological development and the digital transformation of economies, the impact of intellectual property on economic growth will increase. The article shows that the forms and means of legal protection and use of intellectual property will evolve in line with the opportunities that will be provided by the infrastructure (production, fixation, management, tracking and protection of intellectual property rights) in this area. In Russia, the "digitalization" of legal protection and use of intellectual property rights will make it possible to form public-private platforms for rights management, which will create additional opportunities for authors to effectively manage their rights. This will attract investors to the non-raw-material sector of the economy and may become an important driver for the development of the digital economy in the country as a whole.
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 53, Heft 2, S. 487-493
ISSN: 1471-6895
EC intellectual property law has now reached a significant level of harmonization, and the Community can take pride in its achievements in this respect. The need to report a wealth of new matters leaves little space for introduction. However, two issues may be highlighted here briefly. The first is that in May 2004 ten new Member States will join the EU. Although enlargement offers immense opportunities, it also presents a considerable practical challenge. The second is the Commission's plan for a directive to harmonize procedure and remedies for intellectual property infringement throughout the EU.1It seeks to go further than the ground rules on enforcement already laid down by TRIPs, and to lay down specific procedural codes for intellectual property infringement of all types—not merely piracy and counterfeiting. This enthusiasm for intervention in the procedural aspects of national law has raised serious concerns in some quarters.