The Abyei Arbitration
In: THE ABYEI ARBITRATION (THE GOVERNMENT OF SUDAN / THE SUDAN PEOPLE'S LIBERATION MOVEMENT/ARMY) FINAL AWARD OF 2009, pp. 1-33, Permanent Court of Arbitration, 2012
2576358 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: THE ABYEI ARBITRATION (THE GOVERNMENT OF SUDAN / THE SUDAN PEOPLE'S LIBERATION MOVEMENT/ARMY) FINAL AWARD OF 2009, pp. 1-33, Permanent Court of Arbitration, 2012
SSRN
In 1885, Germany and Portugal became neighbours in Africa. The newly founded colony of German Southwest Africa prevented the southwards expansion of the ancient colony of Angola. The border along the Cunene and Kavango Rivers remained under dispute. After the outbreak of World War I in Europe, Portugal's neutrality was questioned in German Southwest Africa, and when a group of German officials waiting near the border of Angola for food transports were shot in the Angolan fortress Naulila, a state of war between both colonies seemed inevitable. German troops launched several military reprisals against fortresses in southern Angola, most significantly against Naulila in December 1914. After their victory at Naulila, the Germans retreated to GSWA. However, African powers, most notably Kwanyama forces led by King Mandume, used the weakness of the defeated Portuguese army to expel the colonial troops from southern Angola. In 1915, a counter-offensive was launched with troops from Portugal that ended with the complete occupation of Kwanyama territories. After the war, a Luso-German arbitration procedure according to the Treaty of Versailles (1919) assessed the damages in Angola and Germany's responsibility to pay reparations. The arbitration award of 1928 that established Germany's responsibility for the violation of international law when attacking Naulila became a landmark case. It still holds relevance for modern international law. The final part of this book analyses the memorial culture that developed in Angola, Namibia, Germany and Portugal around the war in 1914/15.
BASE
In: International Law - Book Archive pre-2000
In: Nova et Vetera Iuris Gentium 19
This volume completes the monumental, eleven-volume series, International Law in Historical Perspective , which was published over a period of 24 years by Professor J.H.W. Verzijl (and continued after his death in 1987 by W.P. Heere and J.P.S. Offerhaus). This index volume provides insight into the series both for the uninitiated and initiated, enabling the user to access all 11 volumes (spanning a total of 6500 printed pages) quickly and easily. It contains a subject index, an index of personal names, of geographical names, of ships' names, a list of treaties, a list of international judgements and a list of international arbitrations. A list of Professor Verzijl's commentaries on the more recent jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice completes the volume
In: Clarendon law series
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 109, Heft 3, S. 498-513
ISSN: 2161-7953
Public international law and comparative law have so far been regarded as largely distinct fields, with little to no overlap between them. The degree of separation between the two disciplines is rendered in particularly stark relief by the absence in practice or scholarship of any real inquiry into the relationship between comparative law on the one hand and customary international law and general principles of international law on the other. Some eminent international lawyers go so far as to claim that it would be both unnecessary and unrealistic to have recourse to comparative law in the context of the identification of customary international law and general principles of law, pointing to the case law of the Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Court of Justice, which, according to them, "show[s] a clear disinclination towards the use of the comparative method."
In: Montana Law Review, Band 68, Heft 151
SSRN
In: International legal materials: current documents, Band 36, Heft 6, S. 1562
ISSN: 0020-7829
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 201
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: Aspen treatise series
In: World affairs: a journal of ideas and debate, Band 103, S. 72-74
ISSN: 0043-8200
In: Centre d'Étude et de Recherche de Droit International et de Relations Internationales 1987