Die große Transformation der Religionen
In: Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik: Monatszeitschrift, Band 58, Heft 6, S. 111-118
ISSN: 0006-4416
148679 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik: Monatszeitschrift, Band 58, Heft 6, S. 111-118
ISSN: 0006-4416
In: International journal of intelligence and counterintelligence, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 375-388
ISSN: 0885-0607
In: Sociological focus: quarterly journal of the North Central Sociological Association, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 354-383
ISSN: 2162-1128
In: Boom: a journal of California, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 15-19
ISSN: 2153-764X
In: Neue Gesellschaft, Frankfurter Hefte: NG, FH. [Deutsche Ausgabe], Band 58, Heft 4, S. 21-24
ISSN: 0177-6738
In: Strategies of Peace, S. 317-348
In: The journal of popular culture: the official publication of the Popular Culture Association, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 583-584
ISSN: 1540-5931
In: Advertising & society review, Band 10, Heft 4
ISSN: 1534-7311
In: Faith-Based Diplomacy Trumping Realpolitik, S. 76-90
In: International studies review, Band 9, Heft 3, S. 528-530
ISSN: 1468-2486
In: International studies review, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 307-309
ISSN: 1521-9488
In: Politique étrangère: PE ; revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut Français des Relations Internationales, Heft 4, S. 932-934
ISSN: 0032-342X
In: Administrative theory & praxis: ATP ; a quarterly journal of dialogue in public administration theory, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 182-195
ISSN: 1949-0461
In: The review of politics, Band 67, Heft 3, S. 419-432
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: The review of politics, Band 67, Heft 3, S. 419-431
ISSN: 1748-6858
Jeremy Waldron's much noted book, God, Locke, and Equality, has put the topic of "God and Equality in Locke" at the center of many perhaps most, discussions of Locke these days. I am going to raise some critical objections to Waldron's interpretations, but all the more reason to begin by noting the very many things about this book that I admire.First, he rejects the insistence by many of the most outspoken Locke scholars that a proper understanding of Locke—or any philosopher of the past—must be purely historical—that it must have nothing to do with us or our concerns, questions, or problems. Professor Waldron cuts through this claim as mere arbitrary assertion.Second, many Locke scholars, often some of the same ones, insist that Locke's political writings must be understood in isolation from his philosophic writings, especially from his Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Locke's editor, Peter Laslett, set the tone long ago when he pronounced judgment: "Locke did not write as a philosopher, applying to politics the implications of his views of reality as a whole." Rather, according to Laslett, Locke appealed to or drew off of preexisting "modes of discourse." This approach makes it very difficult to understand Locke as an integral personality, much less as a coherent author or as a thinker to be taken seriously. Waldron thus reopens the lines of communication between Locke's political and his philosophical writings and makes Locke a significant thinker, not just a corpse for the historians.